Good News: Firms and Jobs

Many people complain that the US economy does not create enough new jobs or soon won’t create enough jobs or won’t create enough good jobs or … People worry about employment. Writers and politicians cater to that worry. Fortunately for us, the US economy creates jobs year after year after year, only briefly interrupted by increasingly less frequent and brief periods of economic recession. I’ll share the core numbers on healthy firms and new jobs and provide some context and history which indicates that this is inherent in the modern US economy. The economy is not relying upon any major political change or special insight to continue adding jobs. It just happens.

For 9 straight years, from 2011-2020, across 3 presidential terms and 5 congresses, the US economy added 2 million new jobs each year. In the 1980’s, it added 2-4M per year. In the 1990’s it added 3M per year. In the “oughts”, it added 2M per year. 30 years of expansion, 7 lesser years that averaged more than zero. 4 strong years for every 1 weak year..

The recovery since the pandemic has been even stronger, starting at 8M new jobs per year in 2021 before sliding to 6M per year and most recently 4.5M per year.

My post earlier this week focused on the role of start-ups in driving job growth. I’d like to build upon that post.

The total number of firms in the US grew slowly in the last 40 years, from 3.5 million to 5 million. The growth rate was much faster prior to the Great Recession (2007-9). Much of this growth was accounted for by single employee firms. Despite this tame 1% growth per year, the economy was able to add more than 2 million jobs per year.

The number of establishments (locations) grew almost twice as fast, just under 2% per year.

The US economy requires some growth in the number of firms or establishments each year to drive job growth. Fortunately, it does not require heroic growth rates.

The number of new establishments added per year is remarkably consistent, averaging about 700,000 per year on a base of 5-7M. Of course, this means that the RATE of new establishments is shrinking, from 14% to less than 10%.

Establishment exits have increased from 500K to 600K to 700K before returning back to 600K per year. Big picture, 700K new establishments and 600K lost establishments each year across 4 decades.

Firm deaths have also been consistent at 450,000 per year.

Data calculated from BDS data. Direct graph not available.

Firm births have also averaged about 450,000 per year but present a different pattern. Firm births were much lower in the troubled time around 1980. Births ranged from 450-500,000 per year in the next 25 years. The Great Depression destroyed businesses, access to capital, personal net worth and aggregate demand. Hence, new firm creation dropped back to the 400,000 level. It recovered back to the 450,000 per year rate by 2015. As with firm deaths, the rate has fallen from 14%+ to less than 10%. Most importantly, the birth and death rates have been relatively consistent and have both been relatively flat, leading to a slow increase in the number of US firms.

https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2022/business-employment-dynamics-by-age-and-size/home.htm

The BDS database shows that job gains and job losses generally move together, but that in a recession job gains fall and job losses increase. This is a very important result. Without active government or policy intervention, the economy creates 12-14M jobs each year and destroys 11-13M jobs each year. There is no guarantee that net jobs will be created in any given year, but overall that is the normal result.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/trends-in-new-business-creation/

Writers who wish to emphasize the decline of entrepreneurship focus on firms instead of establishments because of the slower growth rate. They emphasize the growth rate rather than the growth numbers because this is less positive. They don’t compare the growth and death rates or numbers, which move together. They focus on the aftermath of the Great Recession which did greatly slow firm creation, resulting in slower than historical numbers and rates of job creation from new firms. Nevertheless, the economy created 2M new jobs per year for 9 years. During that period, existing firms captured a larger than usual share of the job growth required to provide demanded goods and services.

New establishments have driven 5-6M new jobs each year. The late nineties to early “oughts” reported the higher 6M per year figure.

Existing (continuing) establishments have added 10-12M gross new jobs each year.

Establishment deaths (including firm deaths) resulted in 4-5M jobs lost each year.

Continuing establishments trimmed 8-9M jobs each year, and many more during recessionary times. Although there are many moving parts, continuing firms eliminate more jobs than they create, especially during recessionary periods when they are adapting to lower demand. Firms die and they close locations, removing 4M jobs each year. New firms and new establishments add the new jobs required to fill the 2M net new jobs each year. This does not happen automatically or precisely, but overall, through time, the pattern is clear.

The US job market has grown from 90-150M positions during the last 40 years.

Firms hire 75M people each year. The typical job tenure is just 2 years.

Separations and hires generally move together. The net 2M jobs added annually is a small fraction of employment, hires, separations, gross job adds and gross job losses.

Establishment births exceed establishment deaths except during deep recessions.

New firms have high failure rates. Fortunately, firms that survive their first year have high percentage rates of new hires. They start with a small number of employees (4) and grow rapidly. The survival rate improves with the age of the firm and the employment growth rate of surviving firms tends to decline as they grow. The combined effect is that 80% of the new employees added by startup firms remain after 10 years. This employment survival rate has been improving in the last 15 years, partially offsetting the reduced number of start-up businesses.

https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2022/business-employment-dynamics-by-age-and-size/home.htm

The first-year survival rate has remained roughly the same at 80% for 25 years.

The percent of non-business owning adults who start a business each month has shown a small upward trend before jumping up in 2020 and 2021.

The ratio of new employer businesses to population dropped significantly after the Great Recession, but has recovered in the last 4 years.

The share of “new employer businesses” dropped after the Great Recession and has not fully recovered.

The number of application for new business tax ids increased significantly after the Great Recession and jumped by 50% after the pandemic.

The Census Bureau also tracks a subset of the total new business applications based upon industry classification that is a better predictor of actual businesses eventually started. This measure shows modest growth after the Great Recession and a 30% spike after the pandemic.

About 10% of new business applications become new businesses. Hence, the rate of new business formation to be reported for 2022 is expected to be very high.

https://www.silive.com/business/2022/08/new-business-applications-are-on-the-rise-heres-what-led-to-a-record-setting-year.html

https://www.nber.org/digest/202109/business-formation-surged-during-pandemic-and-remains-strong

https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/how-many-new-businesses-start-each-year

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/trends-in-new-business-creation/

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/trends-in-new-business-creation/

About 80% of new businesses are formed based on opportunity and 20% based on necessity. Kauffman estimates that 2020 business formation was 30% based on necessity.

Summary

The US economy continues to generate 2 million new jobs in each non-recession year, even more in boom periods like the last 2 years. Firms and establishments are born, grow and die. The net employment growth rate for established firms is less than zero in their first 5-10 years and then slightly positive. The annual death rate of existing firms and establishments is relatively low, but on a 150M employee base it is 4M per year. The new jobs added by startup firms and new establishments allow the total number of employees to grow in normal years.

There is no “iron law of employment” that requires new firms or establishments to be created in numbers greater than the job losses. There is no law that requires surviving young firms to nearly offset job losses by young firms that die at a high rate. There is no law that requires mature firms (10 years old+) to add new employees or to die at slow rates. But these results have been consistent or improving for the last 40 years. I look forward to continued success.

Good News: US Solar Power Accelerates

https://www.jpost.com/jpost-tech/largest-solar-energy-field-in-us-to-be-built-by-israeli-company-682123

US Solar Potential is Strong

Solar Power Generating Installations are Growing Exponentially, Mainly at Utility Scale

The Total Solar Power Generating Base Grows

Solar Power is the Leader for New Electricity Generating Capacity

Solar Power is Now 4% of Electricity Generation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_the_United_States

Commercial/Corporate Solar Power is Growing

Residential Growth Continues

Community Solar Projects Growth Slows

Utility Scale Installations are Growing Most Rapidly

Costs Continue to Decline, Making Solar Competitive with All Other Sources

Short-term Supply Chain, Trade and Regulatory Challenges. New Government Incentives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_the_United_States

https://www.seia.org/research-resources/solar-market-insight-report-2022-q3

https://www.seia.org/news/us-solar-market-ready-rebound-after-tumultuous-first-half-2022

https://www.seia.org/solar-industry-research-data

https://cen.acs.org/energy/solar-power/US-solar-polysilicon-supply-problem/100/i33

https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-futures-study

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/08/solar-installations-will-nearly-triple-over-the-next-five-years-seia.html

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/09/us-installs-record-solar-capacity-as-prices-keep-falling/

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/developers-add-less-than-half-planned-us-solar-capacity-h1-eia-2022-08-11/

Summary

Utility scale photovoltaic solar panel energy generation is the future for the US energy market. The cost structure is already low enough to justify 30-40 year investment projects. Solar projects are 40% of new electricity generation projects, heading towards 50-60%, competing fairly with wind power. Solar power at 4% of the total electricity generating capacity is still relatively small, but the new investments will drive it to 8%, 12%, 16% and 20% in the next 20 years.

A Very Responsive US Labor Market: 1970 – 2021

https://www.staffordschools.net/Page/20853

This is a follow-up article to my recent post on “A Very Robust Long-term US Labor Market (1970-2021). Rather than focus on total growth or the “skill-level” of jobs in the labor market, I want to focus on the roles or functions (like career clusters, similar to industries) played by the 150 million US workers in 2021. I’ve grouped the 500 detailed occupations into 17 categories so that we can look at subtotals ranging from 1% to 20% of the total, with an average of 16%. Enough detail to highlight the very significant changes in the last half-century.

Let’s start with the 1970 data. 75 million employees. Manufacturing was the “big dog”, with almost 14 million workers, 18% of the total, a little less than one out of five.

Administrative workers, including clerical, HR and accounting staff at all job levels were the second largest group, with 10 million people and 13% of the total, one out of eight jobs. These two traditional categories accounted for 31% of the total, not quite one-third.

The next three groups each accounted for 9% of the total, one of every eleven employees. Sales workers, at managerial, professional and retail/clerical levels. Members of the logistics industry broadly defined, including both transportation and distribution staff. Employees of the construction industry. Once again, classic job functions in 1970 that would have been familiar in 1930.

The narrowly defined “service sector”, combining staff in the food service, travel and personal services industries contained 5.5 million workers, or 7% of the total. These six together included 70% of all workers.

Six other categories were each a much smaller 4-5% of the total: Education (KG-post secondary), Cleaning and Groundskeeping, Health Care, Analysis (finance, IT, operations, engineering and marketing), Ag/Mining and Repair/Installation/Maintenance.

The final five categories each averaged just 1.5% of total jobs: Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, Managers/Supervisors, Protection/Legal, Entertainment/Arts and Relating/Counselors.

By 1970 production agriculture had already declined to an immaterial share of the economy. The historically male and blue collar dominated Manufacturing, Logistics, Construction and Repair categories combined to account for 40% of all jobs; two out of five. The historically more female friendly Administration and Sales functions held 25% of all jobs, one in four. Education was the largest “information industry” at 5%, largely dominated by traditional elementary and secondary school teachers. A more broadly defined service group of food service, travel, personal service, cleaning/grounds and health care summed to 17% of the total, or one in six jobs.

Six categories changed very significantly between 1970 and 2021. Manufacturing dropped from first place to tenth place, from 18% to just 5% of employment, from 14 to 8 million employees. US firms improved labor and overall productivity throughout this period, keeping the most productive firms and factories open, while closing and outsourcing work from the others. This was a tremendous change in the labor market, completed in just two generations of workers.

The Administrative category also declined markedly, from second place to fifth place, shrinking from 13% to less than 9% of total employment, but increasing slightly from 10 to 13 million staff. Process, computer and telecom changes drove improved productivity. Some administrative jobs were outsourced. While the Manufacturing sector lost two-thirds of its labor market share, the Administrative sector lost one-third.

The Ag/Mining group was the third losing category, dropping by nearly two-thirds from 3.9% to 1.4% of all employment. When politicians talk about “reviving” manufacturing, mining or production agriculture they are working against very strong long-term trends.

The largest growth was in the “Analysis” category, which grew by two and one-half times as a share of the total, from 4% to 10%. There was incremental growth in the existing Engineering sub-category, adding 2 million roles. The IT category grew added almost 6 million roles from a base near zero. The operations, finance, marketing analysis group added another 6 million positions to its base of 1.5 million. The “Analysts” category rose from tenth place to first place as firms became more complex and found ways to better employ the talents of individuals with high level analytical skills. At 11% of the economy, one out of every nine jobs falls into the analysis category.

Health Care increased from ninth place to second place, moving from 4.4% to 10.3% of all jobs (2.5X). The number of jobs grew by 13 million, from 3 to 16 million.

The Managers/Supervisors category climbed from fourteenth to ninth place, rising from 1.8% to 5.2% of the economy, adding almost 7 million jobs. The 1970 detailed coding was somewhat different from the modern approach, with many supervisors and managers grouped with other professions or industries. My best guess is that on a comparable basis, the 1970 category would have been closer to 2.5 million than the reported 1.4 million managers and supervisors. This would have put this group in thirteenth place in 1970. Hence, the growth as a share of the total market would be smaller, from 3.3% to 5.2%, but still quite significant. Once again, larger firms with more complexity demanded more managers and supervisors.

In total, we have 20% (1/5 workers) leaving the Manufacturing, Administration and Ag/Mining sectors and 16% (1/6 workers) joining the Analysis, Health Care and Managers sectors.

Comparing the millions of employees in 1970 to 2021 by sector clearly shows the massive changes in the labor market. The Health Care and Analysis sectors leapt from a small 3 million workers each to 16 million workers each. Manufacturing fell in absolute terms from 14 to 8 million workers. The Sales and Service sectors began as large sectors, so their relatively normal growth still added about 8 million roles each. Construction and Administration began as larger sectors and were able to add 3 million employees each, despite slower than average growth rates. Logistics grew slightly slower than the market, but added 6 million workers. Education grew faster than average, adding 6 million colleagues.

Relative growth rates as a percentage of the 1970 base or as a percentage of the total mostly tell the same story. Manufacturing, Administration and Ag/Mining have declined sharply. Analysis, Health Care and Management have grown materially.

The 152 largest detailed occupations and those with the greatest change in employment are documented below. They account for 91 million jobs, 59% of the 2021 total.

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bls.gov%2Fcps%2Fcpsaat11.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

Summary

Economists assert that the principles of comparative advantage drive national economic activity. In essence, nations, firms and individuals rationally do what they are “relatively” best at, which changes through time. We see this reduction in the role of agriculture, manufacturing and mining across long periods in the US.

Economists assert that consumers’ tastes change as they have higher income and the relative prices of goods change. Once basic “food, clothing and shelter” needs are met, people turn to other “needs” and “wants”. These tend to be “services” and we also see this transformation.

Economists assert that profit maximizing firms will employ labor that provides a return on the investment based on the marginal or incremental value added by the labor resource. In a more complex economy, professional and managerial skills are in greater demand. Firms (and not-for-profits and governments) have adapted very well to these major changes in the last 50 years.

These changes are not without major pain to individuals, firms and local economies. The general trends in the economy (more automation, greater trade/outsourcing, more services, more personal care, greater role for analytical skills) are clear. Nations, firms, individuals and regions that adapt to the trends will be relatively successful. This requires wise individual and political choices and investments.

Appendix: Other Reference Articles/Sources

https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/area_emp_chart/area_emp_chart.htm

https://stacker.com/stories/3487/most-common-jobs-america

https://stacker.com/stories/3494/most-common-jobs-america-100-years-ago

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/04/28/americas-most-and-least-common-jobs/8285441/

https://billshander.com/dataviz/occupations/

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat09.htm

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/occupations-decades-100

A Very Robust Long-term US Labor Market (1970-2021)

A Dozen False Claims of Journalists, Analysts and Pundits

Job growth is too slow, there are not enough jobs.

All of the good jobs are gone, there are fewer good jobs.

The only growth has been in “low wage”, service jobs.

There are no “blue collar” jobs, no “hands-on” work is available today.

Jobs are all “dumbed down”, no real content remains.

Automation, computers and artificial intelligence are eliminating all jobs.

There is no room for advancement at work.

The economy is inherently stagnant, firms are unable to create new positions.

We’ve become a nation of shopkeepers.

There’s no hope for millennials in the job market, Boomers are leaving a disaster.

More and more jobs are subject to the “imposter syndrome”, they really do nothing.

This time is different, we have reached the “end times” for jobs.

The Data Says …

The US Census Bureau and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics attempt to measure the detailed occupations in the evolving US labor market. I have selected 1970 as a baseline because it is effectively prior to the “computer revolution” and within my lifetime of observing the labor market. The US economy was still essentially in the post WWII boom period with manufacturing clearly the most important industry in 1970. Prior to Japanese or Chinese competition. Prior to the “energy crisis” and environmental concerns. Prior to improved social, political and economic opportunities for women, racial and other minorities.

We had 153 million people working in the US labor market in 2021.

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

We had 75-77-79 million people working in 1970.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/1984/demo/pc80-s1-15.pdf

The total measures and the detailed measures are somewhat inconsistent between 1970 and 2021. But, they are adequate to make basic comparisons. The labor force doubled in 50 years. 75 million new jobs created! 15 million new jobs each decade. 1.5 million new jobs each year, on average.

The detailed occupation categories have also changed. The 500+ categories in 1970 are very different from 2021, but the basic measures are roughly consistent. I have mapped the 1970 categories onto the 2021 categories. In 1970, the “undefined” responses were in the 10% range and not reallocated back to the detailed occupations as is done currently. Self-employed individuals were measured differently. Managers and supervisors were measured differently. The current definitions are better aligned with the current jobs. The 1970 categories provided much more detail on the manufacturing sector.

Employment by Job Level

Total employment more than doubled.

The highest level “manager/supervisor” jobs category nearly tripled. 18 million manager/supervisor jobs were added between 1970 and 2021. In 1970, there were 10 million manager/supervisor jobs; 13%, or one out of every 8 positions. The newly added positions are 24% of the labor force in 1970. The 28 million current manager/supervisor roles are 37% of the total 1970 work force. Opportunity, indeed. In 2021 terms, manager/supervisor roles are 18% of the work force, more than one of every six positions.

Professional jobs (college degree plus required) also tripled, growing from 14 to 41 million, an increase of 27 million new jobs. This increase is 36% of the 1970 work force. The manager, supervisor, professional subtotal is 23 million in 1970 (31% of the total). It has grown to 69 million (3X) in 2021, reaching 45% of the labor force. The number of “premium” jobs tripled, while the share of “premium” jobs increased by almost 50% in this half-century. Good news, indeed.

“Skilled” labor jobs were flat across 50 years, declining as a share of total jobs by one-half, from 10% to 5% of the economy. However, their neighbor, technical jobs, increased faster than the economy, adding 10 million high quality positions. The combined skilled labor (trades) and technician/technical level positions increased from 15 to 25 million, overall. This two-thirds growth is slower than the overall labor market’s doubling. Hence, this job level decreased from 20% to 16%, or from one in five to one in six positions. This is a “glass half-full or half-empty” situation. The 14% of the total labor market growth for premium positions is offset by a 4% decline in middle skilled positions, resulting in a 10% increase of combined middle and premium positions as a percentage of the total.

Lower skill level jobs accounted for nearly half of all jobs in 1970; 37 of 75 million. They comprised a decreased 39% of the total in 2021, 59 million out of 153 million. A smaller share of “lower skill” jobs seems like progress. Yet, even here, we have a growing labor market, with 59 million jobs in 2021 versus just 37 million jobs in 1970; 50% more.

The “physical labor” category grew from 22 to 32 million jobs, but it declined from 30% to 21% of the work force. Relatively fewer jobs, absolutely more. The clerical workforce encountered a similar, but less extreme change, growing from 11 to 15 million jobs, but declining from 14% to 10% of the work force. The “service sector” grew twice as fast as the overall economy, increasing from 4 to 12 million jobs and from 6% to 8% of all jobs. The “service sector” is growing disproportionately, but it is a relatively small part of the overall economy, just 8% of the total in 2021.

In total, the lower skilled clerical, labor and service groups combined, grew from 37 million to 59 million positions, but declined from 49% to 39% of all jobs. I see this as progress and look forward to the next half century reducing this category to just 30% of all US jobs.

At the detailed level, we have 70 occupations driving 62 million new jobs, 82% of the 1970 base. We also have 27 occupations experiencing a 12 million jobs loss, 15% of the 1970 base. Joseph Schumpeter’s “creative destruction” model of a dynamic economy is validated. Changes in demand and technology eliminated 12 million jobs, 15% of the total, across 50 years. The US economy is capable of permanently destroying and replacing a quarter million positions each year, about one-fifth to one-third of one percent of total employment.

Let’s go back to the dozen negative claims. Is there support in the details? Are there “good” jobs being destroyed? I only see declines due to “natural causes”: improved IT, telecom, process/quality/manufacturing, international trade, railroad, textile automation/imports, ag productivity, printing and DIY office options.

On the upside, what do we see? Management and supervisor roles growing in all areas in a more complex environment with higher sales volume, more products, faster product introduction, more exports, more outsourcing of functions, greater customer demands in all dimensions, global sourcing and competition.

Technology supplemented/infused positions at all levels. Cashiers, customer service reps, distribution employees, tellers and drivers today leverage IT systems and processes.

Increased specialization/technical skill in many service/technical areas. Retail terminals. WMS. HRIS. EDI. Customer service scripts. Web based transactions.

Increased professional skills, sophistication and impact in all areas.

More professional teachers, nurses, analysts, accountants, lawyers, HR, real estate and financial advisors.

Diverse technical computer, automation, lab, design, legal, teaching, culinary and design technical positions.

More medical, food service and personal care service roles.

Summary

In the last 50 years the US labor market has doubled in size and added an increasing share of managerial/professional/technical positions.

In my next blog, I’ll focus on the next level of detail: 17 categories of the US labor market.

Economy: Solid Landing

https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/sticking-landing-us-navy-software-eases-aircraft-carrier-landings

It’s time to revisit the state of the US economy. The media and stock market are overreacting to the positive news today that the US economy added about 250,000 jobs in September. Pundits and investors deem this as a “too hot” labor market which will drive higher inflation and force the Federal Reserve Board to further increase interest rates to slow the economy. We need to look at history, components of the economy and specific measures carefully to evaluate our position.

In a nutshell, the US Congress and President spent so much to offset the pandemic that we have classic inflation from higher demand and lower supply. At the same time, the Fed increased the money supply and lowered interest rates to zero to ensure that the banking sector did not provide a “credit crunch” to businesses or households. Foreign governments and banks acted similarly. This allowed the world economy to work through the pandemic with minor negative effects. However, the boost to the economy was too much and governments and central bankers were slow to reduce the stimulus they provided. The world was tightly focused on “recovering” to the pre-pandemic GDP and employment levels during 2021, so major changes in government spending and the money supply were not implemented until near the end of 2021. By the start of 2022, it was clear that growth was unsustainable and inflation was rising quickly, so policy makers needed to adjust. They have now done so and the impacts can be seen. So far, the economy is slowing, official recession or not, to low/zero growth and looks to remain at that level through the end of 2022 with low/slow growth expected in the first half of 2023.

We can call this a “soft landing”. We can call this a “growth recession”. We can call this a “recession” or a “recessionette”. There is no evidence of a “major recession” with 2% GDP declines or 3% unemployment rate increases or “50% declines” in housing starts or bank lending freezes or massive industry balances to liquidate or … Inflation is high and seems to have peaked. It is not coming down as quickly as most experts (or me) predicted during the first half of 2022, but many factors indicate that we are not in a self-perpetuating inflationary spiral.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1

With the benefit of hindsight, real GDP growth during 2018-19 was somewhat above trend and unsustainable. A 2% excess output doesn’t seem like much, but it does matter. The economy at the end of 2021 was in roughly the same place with 3.5% style unemployment. 4Q, 2021 was more than $1 trillion higher (5%) than 4Q, 2020. 5% real annual economic growth is very rare for a large, modern, developed economy. This was after the immediate pandemic bounce. The 3rd and 4th quarters of 2022 are likely to be reported as essentially flat with the 2nd quarter. Consensus forecast is near zero growth in the first half of 2023, returning to 2-3% growth in the second half.

https://www.conference-board.org/research/us-forecast#:~:text=This%20outlook%20is%20associated%20with,percent%20year%2Dover%2Dyear.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4514734-soft-landing-in-economics

https://www.npr.org/2022/07/24/1112770581/inflation-recession-soft-landing-rates-jobs-fed

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/energy/why-fed-aim-is-growth-recession-a-not-soft-landing/2022/09/01/c85e9eb8-29c3-11ed-a90a-fce4015dfc8f_story.html

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/26/investing/premarket-stocks-trading

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-13/jpmorgan-says-soft-landing-not-recession-base-case-for-markets

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

Federal spending added $2 trillion to aggregate demand in each of the first two pandemic years. In retrospect, too much extra demand.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58416

US government budget deficit will be $2 trillion lower in the fiscal year ending September, 2022. This is good news. The “excess” spending was capped more than one year ago, so the trend rate is part of the current core economy. “Excess government spending” is not driving inflation today. It contributed to the inflationary build-up during 2021 into the first half of 2022 (economic stimulus works with a lag effect).

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEDG
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SAD

The increased money in consumers’ pockets lead to a 30% increase in purchases of durable goods. Consumers had money. They were afraid to consume in-person services. They bought stuff. They’re still buying stuff. The transition from buying goods to buying services has been slower than expected. This has led to extended supply chain disruptions (globally), higher demand for many commodities and increased goods prices which feed higher inflation and higher demand for labor. The total demand for durable goods has flattened and prices have stopped increasing. This is a much-improved situation from late 2021.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT

Consumers did save some of their extra earnings during 2020 and the first half of 2021, but as prices increased and services became available, consumers chose to spend more and reduce their savings rate down to just 4% of income, well below the 7-8% of the prior expansion period. So, part of the “excess demand” in late 2021 was the drawdown of savings. That cannot happen again. It’s possible that low consumer confidence will reduce spending in the next year, but flat spending is more likely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ISRATIO

Most business cycle recessions show a clear build-up and subsequent liquidation of business inventories. Inventories were reduced (involuntarily) in the recovery from the pandemic and have increased a bit since then. There is no current indication of a pending “inventory recession”. In a “zero growth” retail holiday sales season, there will be some eternally optimistic retailers that have to cut prices to move goods, but this happens nearly every year.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WM2NS

The Fed increased the money supply by an historically unprecedented 25% in response to the pandemic. And then by another 10% during 2021. In hindsight, the 25% was too much and the extra 10% was irresponsible. Fortunately, the money supply growth ended by the fourth quarter of 2021 and has remained flat.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US

Mortgage rates were held to less than 3% for 2 years to support the recovering economy. They have now more than doubled, in excess of 6%. These higher interest rates will slow economic activity in many dimensions: lending, home buying, consumer credit, consumer spending, business investment, risk taking, stock prices, etc. Higher interest rates work with a lag to slow economic activity. They were still at “crazy low” rates at the end of 2021. The impact of higher rates is now being felt.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPNHSUS

With extra savings, higher earnings, lower unemployment, restricted services available and historically low mortgage rates, consumer demand for housing grew rapidly while supply increased marginally. Housing prices (and rents) grew by 30%. Demand has now slowed. Housing inflation has slowed, perhaps to zero. This is a major channel through which GDP is decreased and inflation is reduced. Home purchases usually trigger thousands of dollars of additional move-in and fix-up expenditures.

https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/economists-outlook/existing-home-sales-decline-5-4-as-home-prices-continue-to-rise-in-june-2022
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST

Housing sales and new housing starts have adjusted to the new interest rate environment. Note that the level of new housing starts remains above the pre-pandemic level, so some further decline is possible in the second half of 2022.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SP500

The US and global stock markets very quickly rebounded from the initial pandemic fear levels (-25%) back to the pre-pandemic levels which were more than 10% above the 2018-19 trend line. Stock markets increased after the initial pandemic recovery by 50% in line with growing profits. They have since dropped by one-quarter, a combination of lower expected future profits and higher interest rates increasing corporate financing costs and the cost of equity investors’ funds. Lower stock market prices usually have a negative “wealth” effect, with nominally poorer investors spending less in the current economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL#0

By the second quarter of 2021 we started to see 7-10% annual inflation rates. Increases finally slowed (or stopped) in the last 2 months. Reported inflation on a 12 months apart basis will remain above the 2% target level for the next 9 months, as high monthly inflation during the end of 2021 and the first half of 2022 remains in the measurements. Experts have a wide range of inflation forecasts for the first half of 2023, ranging from 3% to 8%. Most expect inflation to be close to the 2% target by the second half of 2023.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PPIFIS
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PALLFNFINDEXQ

Producer price increases followed the same general pattern as consumer prices. They appear to have reached their peak. Producer prices better reflect global prices, especially the higher price of most commodities. Note the 30% increase in US demand for durable goods.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILWTICO
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILBRENTEU

Global energy prices played a significant role in recent inflation. The last few months displayed an easing of prices, but recent OPEC+ decisions to reduce output indicate oil prices rising some again.

https://www.atlantafed.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker

Nominal wages accelerated during 2022, perhaps peaking at 7% annual growth.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

Yet, real wages have been falling for 2 years. We do not have a 1960’s style wage-price spiral.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/07/september-jobs-report-analysis-no-recession-yet/
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSJOL

Job openings were at a historical high before the pandemic and quickly returned to that level by the end of 2020 and then nearly doubled in the next year+ as businesses saw opportunities to profit from the expanding economy, but could not find workers at the somewhat elevated prevailing wage rates. The number of unfilled jobs has dropped by nearly 2 million recently, from 12 to 10 million. The labor market is returning towards “normal”, but with 10 million open positions, the number of net new positions added is likely to increase throughout the fourth quarter, even as the Fed attempts to slow the overall economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART

The US labor force participation rate slid from 67% to 66% to 63% from 2000 to 2009 to 2015. It dropped by 1.5% due to the pandemic (61.5%) and has since partially recovered to 62.3%, still a full 1% below the recent peak rate just before the pandemic. The labor market recovery has been good, but not great.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01300060

The core, 25-54 year old labor force participation rate has increased by 1.5% since the pandemic to more than 82.5%, less than one-half percent below the recent high of 83% before the pandemic. By this measure, the labor market is recovering nicely, but not completely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11324230

Retirement age workers have not returned to the work force, with more than 1.5% of potential workers choosing to not join the labor market. Employers will need to be more innovative to attract workers back into the labor market.

Summary

The economy is slowing down, inflationary pressures are easing, but the labor market still looks strong. Slow to zero growth for the prior (3rd) and next 3 quarters is likely as inflation falls from 7-8% to 2-4%. Unemployment rates may increase, but it appears that the total number of employees will increase slowly during this low/zero growth period.

Hamilton County Growth Continues

https://www.chacompanies.com/news/chas-96th-street-and-keystone-parkway-project-awarded-indy-chamber-monumental-award/

Fishers has overtaken Carmel to become the largest city. Westfield is growing at the fastest percentage rate, with Noblesville close behind.

The county continues to add about 7,000 people each year to its base of 360,000, the fourth largest county in Indiana.

https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/intercensal-2000-2010-cities-and-towns.html

https://www.stats.indiana.edu/population/sub_cnty_estimates/2020/e2020_townships.asp

The net assessed valuation for property taxes has grown in line with the population, with faster growth in the last 5 years.

Property values have grown less rapidly, but still significantly, on an inflation adjusted basis.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL#0

The real property value per person has remained roughly flat as the county has grown during the last decade. Carmel has higher real estate values and Noblesville has lower real estate values.

Real estate taxes levied by the county itself increased for payments due in 2020, but the real taxes per person remain 20% lower than they were in the “teens”. The county consolidated the provision of certain “emergency” services from the towns and cities in 2020.

https://www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/214

https://www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/95

https://gateway.ifionline.org/public/pts/pts-overview.aspx

Summary

Hamilton County’s growth looks to continue at a sustainable rate, with open land in Fall Creek, Westfield, Noblesville available for development.

11 Million Open Jobs! 2 Jobs for Every Applicant

Available Positions

Industry2007 Pos2019 Pos2022 PosAdds
Govt12.212.511.8-.4
Other5.45.95.6.2
Construct7.77.57.6-.1
Manufacturing14.212.812.7-1.5
Mining.7.7.6-.1
Logistics5.06.16.91.9
Education3.03.83.7.7
Health15.320.320.45.1
Leisure13.316.515.11.8
State/Local Educn10.210.410.20
Finance8.48.78.9.5
Information3.02.82.9-.1
Profl Svcs17.820.921.84.0
Retail15.715.615.8.1
Wholesale5.95.85.8-.1
Total137.8150.3149.812.0
https://www.bls.gov/jlt/

Industry2007 Open2019 Open2022 OpenMore Open
Government.3.5.7.4
Other.2.2.4.3
Construction.2.3.4.2
Manufacturing.3.5.9.5
Mining0000
Logistics.1.3.5.4
Education.1.1.2.1
Health.71.21.91.2
Leisure.61.01.61.0
State/Local Ed.1.2.3.2
Finance.3.4.5.2
IT.1.1.2.1
Profl Svcs.91.32.01.2
Retail.5.91.10,6
Wholesale.2.2.3.1
Total3.67.111.26.6
https://www.bls.gov/jlt/

Open Positions as a Percent of Jobs Available

Industry2007 Rate2019 Rate2022 Rate
Government2.43.65.4
Other3.14.07.3
Construction2.23.84.8
Manufacturing2.33.46.4
Mining2.13.85.6
Logistics2.74.87.4
Education Svcs2.42.94.9
Health4.35.48.6
Leisure4.35.79.8
State/Local Ed1.32.03.2
Finance3.54.25.4
IT4.64.76.7
Profl Svcs4.85.78.6
Retail3.05.26.4
Wholesale2.93.55.0
Total3.34.57.0
https://www.bls.gov/jlt/

Open Positions by Industry, 2021-22

The Department of Labor’s monthly survey provides various measures by industry. I’ve broken down the data into 15 industry segments. Eight (8) of these segments account for 5/6ths of all positions and I’ll focus on these 8.

The number of open jobs in the last year, July, 2021 – July 2022, is lead by Professional Services (2.0), Health (1.9), Leisure (1.6), Retail (1.1), Manufacturing (0.9), Government (0.7), Logistics (0.5) and Finance (0.5).

Seven industries accounted for 5/6ths of the increase from 4.6M openings in 2006-7 to 11.2M open jobs today. Health (1.2), Profl Svcs (1.2), Leisure (1.0), Retail (0.6), Manufacturing (0.5), Government (0.4) and Logistics (0.4) are the open job gainers.

The pre-pandemic increase averaged 40% of the total 15-year increase for most industries. The Manufacturing industry showed job declines between 2006 and before the Pandemic, so 80% of it’s openings increase has been since the pre-Pandemic peak. The Business and Professional Services industry has also grown faster since the Pandemic, with 68% of its job growth in recent years. The Retail industry shows an opposite pattern, with 60% of it’s job growth before the Pandemic and a relatively weaker 40% post-Pandemic (on-line sales growth impact).

Total Positions Available by Industry

Total positions increased by 12M, from 138M in 2006-7 to 150M in the last year. Just 4 industries account for all of the growth, lead by Health (5.1), Profl Svcs (4.0), Logistics (1.9) and Leisure/Hospitality (1.8). The migration from ag/extraction to manufacturing to pure services is accelerating.

Open Positions Rate by Industry

The open positions rate more than doubled, from 3.3% in 2006-7 to 4.5% in 2018-19 to 7.0% in the last year. Unfortunately, the larger and growing industry sectors have above average open position rates. Leisure and hospitality shows an incredible/unsustainable 9.8% job openings rate. Professional and business services and Health Care report nearly as high 8.6% vacancy rates. The Logistics industry has a higher than usual rate of 7.4% as it adds jobs at a faster rate in the home delivery era. The Retail and Manufacturing industries show elevated 6.4% open jobs rates. The Government and Finance industries exhibit 5.4% openings rates.

Changes in the Job Openings Rate

The overall job openings rate more than doubled from 2006-7 to the last year, from 3.3% to 7.0%. Keep in mind that 2006-7 was the peak of that business cycle with job openings at a cyclical low point. The Leisure and Hospitality industry had the largest increase, from its usually relatively high 4.3% to an “other worldly” 9.8%. The pandemic drove down travel and it has slowly recovered. The Logistics industry displayed the second highest increase, from 2.7% (it’s usual Manufacturing-like rate) to 7.4% as the Pandemic drove individual shipments to consumers. The Health Care industry continued its labor intensive growth, doubling from 4.3% to 8.6% of open positions. The Manufacturing industry evolved from its usual low 2.3% all the way up to 6.4% as labor demand in other industries grew and attracted its workers. The Professional and Business Services industry kept growing, resulting in a 3.8% increase in unfilled roles, from a typically high 4.8% to a very high 8.6%. The Retail and Government sectors had lower increases at 3%. The Finance sector had a lower than average 2% increase in open jobs.

Just a “Mix” Variance?

The US economy is very dynamic. Industries with low, medium and high job openings rates in 2006-7 each employed about 45M people. The low job openings rate industries (Govt, Manufacturing, Mining, and Educn Svcs) actually LOST 1.4M positions between 2007 and 2022. The middle rate of job openings industries (Logistics, finance, trade, other) added 2.6% net new jobs (1.7M). The high job openings rate industries (Health, Leisure, IT and Profl/Bus Svcs) added an incredible 10.8M jobs (22%)! The US has moved from agriculture to extractive to manufacturing to services employment. The personal and professional services industries are both the fastest growing and the most difficult to staff today.

What Happens During a Mild Recession?

Business and Professional Services openings drop by 3% of the total or 600K people. Health industry jobs decline by a smaller 1% as they are less sensitive to the business cycle, falling by 100K. Leisure and Hospitality are very understaffed and this is harming their growth. They might trim their employment by 2% or 300K positions. The Retail industry is in a long-run decline, so a 2% decline is likely, eliminating 300K jobs. Manufacturing is more cyclical than other industries, so its labor demand will fall more sharply, 3%, removing 400K job postings. The Government sector is somewhat buffered from recession pressures, so job openings might fall just 1% or 100K. Logistics firms are struggling to deliver, so a 2% job decline is the most I see, cutting another 100K positions. The Finance sector has been less volatile, so I estimate a 1% decline and 100K dip.. The remaining industries are likely to fall in tandem, requiring an additional 400K open jobs decline to meet budgets. This total 2.4M open position trim reduces the balance to 8.8M, far above the 7.1M pre-Pandemic level in 2018-19. I don’t think that the labor market will play its usual role in transmitting/amplifying negative finance, banking, housing, international trade, energy and other disruptions through the American economy.

Summary

The US economy was at “full employment” in 2006-7 with just 4.6M unfilled positions. The extended recovery after the Great Recession delivered an even lower unemployment rate, but it also delivered a much increased 7.1M open positions. The post-Pandemic economy has returned to an amazing 3.5% unemployment rate, but the unfilled position count has climbed to a much higher 11.2M and stayed there. The current 7% vacancy rate is largely driven by 6 of the 15 industries with the highest rates: Leisure (9.8%), Health (8.6%), Profl Svcs (8.6%), Logistics (7.4%), Manufacturing (6.4%) and Retail (6.4%). American business is slowly learning to manage with a tight labor very market. Demand for labor should fall significantly in the future as firms employ greater technology, processes, capital goods and imports.

NOT.

Good News: The US Economy is a Job Creating Machine

https://www.copelandintl.com/blog/oilfield-equipment/the-best-allison-transmission-models-for-your-industry/

In 1942, the US economy employed 41.9 million people in firms. At the end of 2022, the number will be 153.8 million, an increase of 267%. Yes, for very 3 jobs in 1942, we have 11 today. Yes again, almost 4 times as many in 2022 versus 1942, despite the 9 million jobs lost in 2008-9 and the 9 million jobs lost in 2020.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS#0

The US economy added 12 million jobs between 1942 and 1960, growing from 42 to 54 million positions. Job growth averaged nearly 700,000 per year or 1.4% annually. This was a period of solid growth, despite the 4 recessions.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS#0

The period from 1960 through 2001 showed truly remarkable job growth. The economy added 78 million jobs, almost 1.9 million each year or 2.2% annually. STOP and think about this. The Greatest Generation, WW II saving the planet team was just 40 million employees in the US. The immediate post-war boom increased employment to 55 million when the US was the only advanced economy running at full speed. But employment growth accelerated from 1960 to 200. These 4 decades essentially tripled the size of the US economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS#0

Overall, the last two decades have delivered much slower job growth. Using 2019 as an ending measure, the economy grew by 21 million jobs, from 131 to 152 million since 2001. This is just 1.1 million per year, or a growth rate of 0.8%, far below the 2% plus rate of 1960-2000. Or, the 21 million added jobs is one-half of the jobs in 1942 in the heart of WW II.

But, these two decades experienced the post-millennium downturn, the great recession and the covid pandemic.

The economic recovery from the millennium (Y2K) was quite slow. The recovery from the Great Recession was slow but strong and extended, allowing unemployment rates to eventually reach 3.5%. The recovery from the pandemic situation was much faster than expected, reaching pre-pandemic levels of GDP and employment within 2 years.

The economy has been adding 400,000 jobs each month since the beginning of 2021, almost an amazing 5 million jobs annually.

Million Jobs Added Per Year in Economic Recovery Periods

1948: 2.0

1952: 2.2

1956: 1.8

1959: 2.0

1969: 1.9

1973: 2.4

1980: 2.2

1990: 2.5

2000: 2.7

2007: 1.6

2019: 2.2

The US economy adds 2 million jobs each year when the economy is expanding. The percentage growth rate is slower through time, but the 2 million jobs added each year remains a solid capacity or capability.

Summary

The US economy added 1.4% new jobs annually from 1942-1960. The jobs growth rate averaged a very strong 2.2% from 1960-2021. It then slowed to just 0.8% annually while digesting the Great Recession and the COVID pandemic. The economy added more than 2 million jobs each year after the Great Recession, pushing unemployment to a very low 3.5%. The economy rebounded from the pandemic much faster than the consensus view,

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS#0

Despite

  1. increased international trade
  2. greater share of immigrants
  3. greater percentage of federal government spending
  4. fewer new businesses started
  5. declining shares for agriculture, mining and manufacturing
  6. greater outsourcing of corporate functions
  7. greater share of contracting, non-traditional employment, part-time employment
  8. lower rates of geographic mobility
  9. lower rates of economic upward mobility
  10. greatly increased political polarization at the state and local level
  11. decreased labor force participation rates
  12. increased opioid and drug damage rates
  13. lower community service participation rates
  14. lower church attendance and membership rates
  15. lower male college attendance and graduation rates

Despite the very many headwinds, the US economy is still able to add 2 million jobs annually during economic recovery periods. It added 9 million positions in 2021 and looks to add almost 5 million positions in 2022 despite the weakening business cycle. Even with a slowing economy, the US is likely to add 2 million new positions in 2023 and 2024.

Years of Missing Housing

The Housing Market is Tighter than Ever

20% housing price inflation.

Typical house sells in one month.

Listings down by 70%.

https://eyeonhousing.org/2020/01/a-decade-of-home-building-the-long-recovery-of-the-2010s/
https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/09/01/alleviating-supply-constraints-in-the-housing-market/

Existing homes available for sale cut in half, even before the recent decline.

https://www.realtor.com/research/topics/housing-supply/

Even with record prices, new listings lagged during 2020-22.

The supply of new homes available for sale, has remained flat at 300,000 for the last 50 years, while the population has grown by 50%.

The home vacancy rate is at one-half of its historic level.

Housing Units

The ratio of housing units to population in 2021 is 0.38, a little higher than the 0.37 in 2001.

The “American dream” of single family home-ownership remains. Buyers continue to try to recover from the decline from 69% in 2006 to less that 64% in 2015.

The number of owner-occupied (single-family) homes reached a peak of 76 million in 2006 and then flat-lined for eleven (11) years through 2017. An estimated 8 million homes have been added in the last 5 years, about 1.8M per year after zero per year for 11 years.

Supply Has Not Recovered from the Great Recession

https://www.freddiemac.com/research/insight/20181205-major-challenge-to-u.s.-housing-supply

A thorough analysis of supply and demand would include dozens of factors and 100 metro housing markets. However, at the simple trend-based macro level, we see 1.5-1.6 million units per year added from 1960-2010. We see a trough from 2007-2020 with a deficit of more than 5 million missing housing starts.

Even Worse, Starter Homes and Manufactured Housing Have Almost Disappeared, Driving an Affordability “Crisis”.

https://www.freddiemac.com/research/insight/20210507-housing-supply
https://www.freddiemac.com/research/insight/20210507-housing-supply

https://myhome.freddiemac.com/blog/research-and-analysis/20211013-starter-homes

https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/erdmann_-mophousing_was_undersupplied_during_the_great_housing_bubble-_v1.pdf
https://multifamily.fanniemae.com/news-insights/multifamily-market-commentary/manufactured-housing-landscape-2020

Aging of the Housing Stock: The 2010-19 Decade Was a Huge Outlier

https://www.huduser.gov/datasets/ahs/ahs_taskc.pdf

During every decade, except WW II, the US added 10 million+ housing units. They have an expected life of nearly 100 years.

https://eyeonhousing.org/2020/01/a-decade-of-home-building-the-long-recovery-of-the-2010s/
https://eyeonhousing.org/2022/06/the-aging-housing-stock-5/

The US added less than one-half of the usual amount in the teens, driving the median housing stock (owner-occupied) age up from 33 to 39 years. So, it’s even more than the 5 million housing units that weren’t built. The whole stock is older. More units require maintenance. More people are waiting to have the new or “newer” home ownership experience.

Many Ratios Echo the Simple “Missing” Housing Stock Claim

https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/erdmann_-mophousing_was_undersupplied_during_the_great_housing_bubble-_v1.pdf

Housing units per capita has declined. New housing starts have not kept up with population growth.

https://www.mercatus.org/bridge/commentary/us-data-housing-starts-can-be-misleading

Compared with the overall size of the market, housing starts have become a smaller and smaller share.

https://www.freddiemac.com/research/forecast/20170726-lean-inventory-of-houses
https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/09/01/alleviating-supply-constraints-in-the-housing-market/

The last graph is most persuasive for me. Housing starts are less than one-half of what they were in the 1970’s. That’s a big drop. It’s possible that consumers have just chosen to consume less housing and more of other goods and services, but that does not appear to be the case.

https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/erdmann_-mophousing_was_undersupplied_during_the_great_housing_bubble-_v1.pdf

Overall, we’re missing 5-8 million units out of 128 million units in a market that is struggling to deliver 1.6 million units to meet the normal demand.

The Freddie Mac experts come up with a smaller number, just 3.8 million.

https://www.freddiemac.com/research/insight/20181205-major-challenge-to-u.s.-housing-supply

https://www.freddiemac.com/research/insight/20210507-housing-supply

Contrary Views: Supply is OK, Too Much Short-term Demand

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498666-us-housing-is-a-dead-man-walking
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2021/02/03/housing-boom-will-end-after-2021/?sh=27038d981e41

As noted earlier, the total housing units per capita ratio is relatively consistent. “Everybody gotta be somewhere”. The total housing units level has grown, with rental units replacing the desired and missing single-family units. The other graphs are comparing two rates of change and concluding that the rates of change are roughly equal, so there cannot be a shortage. I believe that the very deep and historically unprecedented (except for WW II) catastrophic decline in single family home construction from 2006-2020 created a material deficit in the stock of single family homes. The very weak economic recovery after the “Great Recession” held back new household formation and effective demand for new single family homes, so the construction industry did not recover back to its prior level for a full decade or more. The deficit remains.

Summary

One of the most important concepts in Economics 101 is “stocks and flows”. Stocks are a summary quantity at a single point in time, like all of the gallons of water in Lake Erie behind Niagara Falls. Flows are a quantity per unit of time, like the gallons of water flowing over Niagara Falls per minute, hour or day. Our economy contains both “stocks and flows”, especially relevant in the housing market. The flow of new home construction (single family or multi-family) is one of the most volatile components of GDP (flow of $ produced per year).

Historically, major changes in home construction have driven a majority of all business cycle declines. Bank runs and changes in interest rates account for another one-third. Supply shocks and international trade/currency changes account for the remainder.

Most markets “clear” in a relatively short time period and we collectively quickly benefit from the increases in prices that attract producers and drive consumers to find “next best” options and from the decreases in prices that force producers to leave an industry and reallocate capital elsewhere and the relative increase in consumer demand that limits price declines.

Unfortunately, the real estate industry works across much longer time frames. Consumers “want” to own single-family homes, but they can rent or live with relatives for many years. Construction firms are unable to quickly increase their supply capacity when demand increases. This is an industry where “learning by doing” remains a core factor.

The construction industry was truly “decimated” in 2006-7-8. One-half, two-thirds, three-fourths or four-fifths of all firms in any local market (general contractors and suppliers) were bankrupted. It has been slow to recover as banks were “burned” by construction loans and slow to extend credit to anyone.

The remaining construction firms reached new “critical mass” by 2017 and have been expanding rapidly, subject to zoning, land acquisition, labor and materials constraints.

Nonetheless, the cumulative supply deficit is quite large and will drive housing price increases for many years, perhaps another decade!

Good News: Urban America is Growing Very Nicely

Rural America Grew Very Slowly in the 20th Century, Flattened and May Now be Declining

There are a variety of measures of “rural” US population. The Census Bureau has used local populations of 2,500+ to define urban. It focuses on population density and commuting to define urban counties that map to metropolitan (urban) areas. Other federal agencies use other definitions. Overall, the basic trends are clear.

https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/what-is-rural

The US Census Bureau’s detailed measure of “urban areas” essentially says that any area with 2,500+ people is an “urban” area. This clearly exaggerates the urban population, but this approach has been used for more than a century on a consistent basis, providing useful data. The 2020 measure of urban has been proposed using about 5,000 as the minimum for “urban”, but this definition has not been finalized.

I have focused on the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) as defined in 2020 and recreated their populations back to 1900 based upon the county to MSA maps.

The measure of “percent urban” based upon the metro areas with 100K+ population or 250K+ populations very closely tracks the US Census Bureau’s detailed definition of urban areas (and therefor rural areas).

In summary, US urban population grew from 40% of the total in 1900 to 70% in 1970, about 3/7ths (0.42) of a percent more urban every year for 70 years. The move to “urban” continued in the next 50 years, but at a much slower rate, just 1/5th of a percent per year. But, this accumulates to move the urban percentage from 70% to 80%.

Growth of Very Large Metro Areas Has Driven the Growth in Urban Areas

The 4M+ metro areas have grown the most. The 2M+ and 1M+ areas have also grown. The smaller metro areas have made a smaller contribution to the growth of “urban” America.

The 50th Largest US Metro Area’s Population Has Increased 5-Fold Between 1900 and 2020

The Number of US Metro Areas with 1M, 2M or 4M Populations Has Expanded for a Century

Decade Reaching 1 Million Population                    

1900 New York Chicago Philadelphia Boston Pittsburgh St. Louis
1910
1920 Detroit Cleveland
1930 Los Angeles San Francisco Mpls-St Paul Baltimore Cincinnati Providence
1940 Washington
1950 Dallas-Ft Worth Houston Atlanta Seattle
1950 Kansas City Milwaukee Buffalo
1960 San Diego Columbus, OH Indianapolis
1970 San Bernardino Phoenix Tampa-St. Pete Denver Portland, OR
1970 Charlotte San Jose Virginia Beach New Orleans Hartford
1980 Miami Sacramento San Antonio
1990 Orlando Nashville Memphis Rochester
2000 Austin Las Vegas Louisville Oklahoma City Richmond Jacksonville
2010 Birmingham Salt Lake City Raleigh
2020 Tulsa Fresno Tucson

Decade Reaching 2 Million Population                    

1900 New York Chicago Philadelphia
1910 Boston
1920 Pittsburgh
1930 Detroit Los Angeles
1940
1950 San Francisco
1960 St. Louis Cleveland
1970 Mpls-St Paul Baltimore Washington Dallas-Ft Worth Houston
1980 Atlanta Seattle
1990 San Diego San Bernardino Phoenix Tampa-St. Pete Miami
2000 Cincinnati Denver
2010 Kansas City Portland, OR Charlotte Sacramento San Antonio Orlando
2020 Columbus, OH Indianapolis Austin Las Vegas

Decade Reaching 4 Million Population            

1900 New York
1910
1920
1930 Chicago
1940
1950 Los Angeles
1960 Philadelphia
1970 Detroit
1980
1990 Boston Washington Dallas-Ft Worth Miami
2000 San Francisco Houston Atlanta
2010 San Bernardino Phoenix
2020 Seattle

The Rapid Growth of the Largest US Metro Areas Has Driven the Growth of the Total Population

The Tipping From Very Slow Rural Growth to Possible Decline Has Attracted Attention from Demographers and Political Commentators

https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2021/dec/percent-change-county-population.html
https://carsey.unh.edu/publication/rural-depopulation
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2021/08/10/shrinking-rural-america-faces-state-power-struggle
https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/charts-of-note/?topicId=4e8a0642-e40d-4299-906e-906bbaaf9e4d

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-the-2020-election-revealed-divide-in-american-dream-2020-11

https://dailyyonder.com/rural-population-declines-slightly-over-last-decade-census-shows/2021/09/07/

https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/econ_focus/2020/q1/district_digest

Summary

The disproportionate growth of “urban” and very large urban metro areas has continued in the last 50 years. This has a tremendous impact on the lives and perspectives of those in relatively declining rural and growing urban areas.