Economy: Solid Landing

https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/sticking-landing-us-navy-software-eases-aircraft-carrier-landings

It’s time to revisit the state of the US economy. The media and stock market are overreacting to the positive news today that the US economy added about 250,000 jobs in September. Pundits and investors deem this as a “too hot” labor market which will drive higher inflation and force the Federal Reserve Board to further increase interest rates to slow the economy. We need to look at history, components of the economy and specific measures carefully to evaluate our position.

In a nutshell, the US Congress and President spent so much to offset the pandemic that we have classic inflation from higher demand and lower supply. At the same time, the Fed increased the money supply and lowered interest rates to zero to ensure that the banking sector did not provide a “credit crunch” to businesses or households. Foreign governments and banks acted similarly. This allowed the world economy to work through the pandemic with minor negative effects. However, the boost to the economy was too much and governments and central bankers were slow to reduce the stimulus they provided. The world was tightly focused on “recovering” to the pre-pandemic GDP and employment levels during 2021, so major changes in government spending and the money supply were not implemented until near the end of 2021. By the start of 2022, it was clear that growth was unsustainable and inflation was rising quickly, so policy makers needed to adjust. They have now done so and the impacts can be seen. So far, the economy is slowing, official recession or not, to low/zero growth and looks to remain at that level through the end of 2022 with low/slow growth expected in the first half of 2023.

We can call this a “soft landing”. We can call this a “growth recession”. We can call this a “recession” or a “recessionette”. There is no evidence of a “major recession” with 2% GDP declines or 3% unemployment rate increases or “50% declines” in housing starts or bank lending freezes or massive industry balances to liquidate or … Inflation is high and seems to have peaked. It is not coming down as quickly as most experts (or me) predicted during the first half of 2022, but many factors indicate that we are not in a self-perpetuating inflationary spiral.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1

With the benefit of hindsight, real GDP growth during 2018-19 was somewhat above trend and unsustainable. A 2% excess output doesn’t seem like much, but it does matter. The economy at the end of 2021 was in roughly the same place with 3.5% style unemployment. 4Q, 2021 was more than $1 trillion higher (5%) than 4Q, 2020. 5% real annual economic growth is very rare for a large, modern, developed economy. This was after the immediate pandemic bounce. The 3rd and 4th quarters of 2022 are likely to be reported as essentially flat with the 2nd quarter. Consensus forecast is near zero growth in the first half of 2023, returning to 2-3% growth in the second half.

https://www.conference-board.org/research/us-forecast#:~:text=This%20outlook%20is%20associated%20with,percent%20year%2Dover%2Dyear.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4514734-soft-landing-in-economics

https://www.npr.org/2022/07/24/1112770581/inflation-recession-soft-landing-rates-jobs-fed

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/energy/why-fed-aim-is-growth-recession-a-not-soft-landing/2022/09/01/c85e9eb8-29c3-11ed-a90a-fce4015dfc8f_story.html

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/26/investing/premarket-stocks-trading

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-13/jpmorgan-says-soft-landing-not-recession-base-case-for-markets

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

Federal spending added $2 trillion to aggregate demand in each of the first two pandemic years. In retrospect, too much extra demand.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58416

US government budget deficit will be $2 trillion lower in the fiscal year ending September, 2022. This is good news. The “excess” spending was capped more than one year ago, so the trend rate is part of the current core economy. “Excess government spending” is not driving inflation today. It contributed to the inflationary build-up during 2021 into the first half of 2022 (economic stimulus works with a lag effect).

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEDG
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SAD

The increased money in consumers’ pockets lead to a 30% increase in purchases of durable goods. Consumers had money. They were afraid to consume in-person services. They bought stuff. They’re still buying stuff. The transition from buying goods to buying services has been slower than expected. This has led to extended supply chain disruptions (globally), higher demand for many commodities and increased goods prices which feed higher inflation and higher demand for labor. The total demand for durable goods has flattened and prices have stopped increasing. This is a much-improved situation from late 2021.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT

Consumers did save some of their extra earnings during 2020 and the first half of 2021, but as prices increased and services became available, consumers chose to spend more and reduce their savings rate down to just 4% of income, well below the 7-8% of the prior expansion period. So, part of the “excess demand” in late 2021 was the drawdown of savings. That cannot happen again. It’s possible that low consumer confidence will reduce spending in the next year, but flat spending is more likely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ISRATIO

Most business cycle recessions show a clear build-up and subsequent liquidation of business inventories. Inventories were reduced (involuntarily) in the recovery from the pandemic and have increased a bit since then. There is no current indication of a pending “inventory recession”. In a “zero growth” retail holiday sales season, there will be some eternally optimistic retailers that have to cut prices to move goods, but this happens nearly every year.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WM2NS

The Fed increased the money supply by an historically unprecedented 25% in response to the pandemic. And then by another 10% during 2021. In hindsight, the 25% was too much and the extra 10% was irresponsible. Fortunately, the money supply growth ended by the fourth quarter of 2021 and has remained flat.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US

Mortgage rates were held to less than 3% for 2 years to support the recovering economy. They have now more than doubled, in excess of 6%. These higher interest rates will slow economic activity in many dimensions: lending, home buying, consumer credit, consumer spending, business investment, risk taking, stock prices, etc. Higher interest rates work with a lag to slow economic activity. They were still at “crazy low” rates at the end of 2021. The impact of higher rates is now being felt.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPNHSUS

With extra savings, higher earnings, lower unemployment, restricted services available and historically low mortgage rates, consumer demand for housing grew rapidly while supply increased marginally. Housing prices (and rents) grew by 30%. Demand has now slowed. Housing inflation has slowed, perhaps to zero. This is a major channel through which GDP is decreased and inflation is reduced. Home purchases usually trigger thousands of dollars of additional move-in and fix-up expenditures.

https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/economists-outlook/existing-home-sales-decline-5-4-as-home-prices-continue-to-rise-in-june-2022
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST

Housing sales and new housing starts have adjusted to the new interest rate environment. Note that the level of new housing starts remains above the pre-pandemic level, so some further decline is possible in the second half of 2022.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SP500

The US and global stock markets very quickly rebounded from the initial pandemic fear levels (-25%) back to the pre-pandemic levels which were more than 10% above the 2018-19 trend line. Stock markets increased after the initial pandemic recovery by 50% in line with growing profits. They have since dropped by one-quarter, a combination of lower expected future profits and higher interest rates increasing corporate financing costs and the cost of equity investors’ funds. Lower stock market prices usually have a negative “wealth” effect, with nominally poorer investors spending less in the current economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL#0

By the second quarter of 2021 we started to see 7-10% annual inflation rates. Increases finally slowed (or stopped) in the last 2 months. Reported inflation on a 12 months apart basis will remain above the 2% target level for the next 9 months, as high monthly inflation during the end of 2021 and the first half of 2022 remains in the measurements. Experts have a wide range of inflation forecasts for the first half of 2023, ranging from 3% to 8%. Most expect inflation to be close to the 2% target by the second half of 2023.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PPIFIS
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PALLFNFINDEXQ

Producer price increases followed the same general pattern as consumer prices. They appear to have reached their peak. Producer prices better reflect global prices, especially the higher price of most commodities. Note the 30% increase in US demand for durable goods.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILWTICO
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILBRENTEU

Global energy prices played a significant role in recent inflation. The last few months displayed an easing of prices, but recent OPEC+ decisions to reduce output indicate oil prices rising some again.

https://www.atlantafed.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker

Nominal wages accelerated during 2022, perhaps peaking at 7% annual growth.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

Yet, real wages have been falling for 2 years. We do not have a 1960’s style wage-price spiral.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/07/september-jobs-report-analysis-no-recession-yet/
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSJOL

Job openings were at a historical high before the pandemic and quickly returned to that level by the end of 2020 and then nearly doubled in the next year+ as businesses saw opportunities to profit from the expanding economy, but could not find workers at the somewhat elevated prevailing wage rates. The number of unfilled jobs has dropped by nearly 2 million recently, from 12 to 10 million. The labor market is returning towards “normal”, but with 10 million open positions, the number of net new positions added is likely to increase throughout the fourth quarter, even as the Fed attempts to slow the overall economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART

The US labor force participation rate slid from 67% to 66% to 63% from 2000 to 2009 to 2015. It dropped by 1.5% due to the pandemic (61.5%) and has since partially recovered to 62.3%, still a full 1% below the recent peak rate just before the pandemic. The labor market recovery has been good, but not great.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01300060

The core, 25-54 year old labor force participation rate has increased by 1.5% since the pandemic to more than 82.5%, less than one-half percent below the recent high of 83% before the pandemic. By this measure, the labor market is recovering nicely, but not completely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11324230

Retirement age workers have not returned to the work force, with more than 1.5% of potential workers choosing to not join the labor market. Employers will need to be more innovative to attract workers back into the labor market.

Summary

The economy is slowing down, inflationary pressures are easing, but the labor market still looks strong. Slow to zero growth for the prior (3rd) and next 3 quarters is likely as inflation falls from 7-8% to 2-4%. Unemployment rates may increase, but it appears that the total number of employees will increase slowly during this low/zero growth period.

Good News: US Manufacturing Output Continues to Grow

https://www.nam.org/state-manufacturing-data/2021-united-states-manufacturing-facts/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_in_the_United_States#/media/File:Manufacturing_GDP_(nominal_and_real)_and_Manufacturing_Employment.png
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/OUTMS
https://www.nam.org/state-manufacturing-data/2021-united-states-manufacturing-facts/
https://www.brookings.edu/research/global-manufacturing-scorecard-how-the-us-compares-to-18-other-nations/

US manufacturing output continues to increase year over year, despite the reduction in employment.

Good News: Weather Forecast Accuracy Is Much Better

Everyone complains about “the weather” and the “weather forecast”, but forecasting accuracy has improved markedly since 1980, which was already at least twice as accurate of the best (pre-computer) forecasts of the 1940’s and 1950’s.

Unfortunately, there is no really simple intuitive way to gauge the improving accuracy, but scientists have provided a variety of measures to indicate the relative improvement.

Improved Accuracy

https://www.iweathernet.com/educational/history-weather-forecasting

36 hour and 72 hour forecast accuracy doubled in the 40 years between 1975 and 2015.

https://public.wmo.int/en/bulletin/weather-and-climate-forecasting-chronicle-revolution

The same level of forecast accuracy was available 8 days out in 2010 as it was 5.5 days out in 1980.

https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/126785/aav7274_CombinedPDF_v1.pdf?sequenc#:~:text=leading%20numerical%20weather%20prediction%20centers,now%20reach%209%2D10%20days

The correlation between forecast and actual weather has improved consistently between 1981 and 2019 for 3-5-7-10 day forecasts. A 5-day forecast today is as accurate as a 1 day forecast in 1980. 9-10 day forecasts are useful today.

A seven-day forecast can accurately predict the weather about 80 percent of the time and a five-day forecast can accurately predict the weather approximately 90 percent of the time. However, a 10-day—or longer—forecast is only right about half the time.

https://scijinks.gov/forecast-reliability/

a five-day forecast is accurate about 80% (link resides outside ibm) of the time. A one-day temperature forecast is typically accurate within 2.5 degrees. 

https://www.ibm.com/weather/industries/broadcast-media/complete-guide-accurate-weather-forcasting

Short-term five-day forecasts are nearly as accurate as two-day projections were three decades ago. 

The forecast error rate has dropped by anywhere from about 70% (for a 24-hour forecast) to about 90% (for a 72-hour forecast) since 1970. To put that in perspective, the average error for a 72-hour forecast was about 450 miles off in 1970. Today, it’s about 50 miles off.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/25/health/weather-forecasting-future-scn/index.html#:~:text=The%20forecast%20error%20rate%20has,it%27s%20about%2050%20miles%20off.

History of Weather Forecasting

https://www.britannica.com/science/weather-forecasting/Long-range-forecasting

https://www.foxweather.com/earth-space/46-years-of-goes-how-a-history-of-achievements-has-changed-weather-forecasting

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/01/why-weather-forecasting-keeps-getting-better

https://celebrating200years.noaa.gov/foundations/numerical_wx_pred/welcome.html#intro

https://public.wmo.int/en/bulletin/weather-and-climate-forecasting-chronicle-revolution

Glorious Weather Forecasting Future

https://www.ibm.com/weather/industries/broadcast-media/complete-guide-accurate-weather-forcasting

https://www.nae.edu/244878/Future-of-Weather-Forecasting

https://celebrating200years.noaa.gov/foundations/numerical_wx_pred/welcome.html#ahead

https://www.wired.com/story/weather-forecasting-artifical-intelligence/

https://www.washington.edu/news/2020/12/15/a-i-model-shows-promise-to-generate-faster-more-accurate-weather-forecasts/

Hamilton County Growth Continues

https://www.chacompanies.com/news/chas-96th-street-and-keystone-parkway-project-awarded-indy-chamber-monumental-award/

Fishers has overtaken Carmel to become the largest city. Westfield is growing at the fastest percentage rate, with Noblesville close behind.

The county continues to add about 7,000 people each year to its base of 360,000, the fourth largest county in Indiana.

https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/intercensal-2000-2010-cities-and-towns.html

https://www.stats.indiana.edu/population/sub_cnty_estimates/2020/e2020_townships.asp

The net assessed valuation for property taxes has grown in line with the population, with faster growth in the last 5 years.

Property values have grown less rapidly, but still significantly, on an inflation adjusted basis.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL#0

The real property value per person has remained roughly flat as the county has grown during the last decade. Carmel has higher real estate values and Noblesville has lower real estate values.

Real estate taxes levied by the county itself increased for payments due in 2020, but the real taxes per person remain 20% lower than they were in the “teens”. The county consolidated the provision of certain “emergency” services from the towns and cities in 2020.

https://www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/214

https://www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/95

https://gateway.ifionline.org/public/pts/pts-overview.aspx

Summary

Hamilton County’s growth looks to continue at a sustainable rate, with open land in Fall Creek, Westfield, Noblesville available for development.

Good News: Election Fraud is Not a Fact-Based Issue in the US

Claims of election fraud have a long history in the US. They exist for 3 reasons. Losers hate to lose. Fraud claims support efforts to restrict voting by opponents. Fraud claims undermine the legitimacy of US democratic processes (Russia).

TRUTH

Historically, without “checks and balances” or other controls, political parties and machines had taken advantage to ensure that they won. We’re mostly talking about 1820-1900. Even in the 20th century, there were states and cities where one party had control and could “deliver” votes at the city, state or national level. This kind of fraud largely ended by the 1960’s based on journalists, lawyers, political opponents and activists overturning this corruption of democracy. Then and now, the numbers of fraudulent votes were very small as a percentage of the votes cast, less than 1%. Fraudulent votes are effective in a democracy only when their small share can tip the election. Most claims of voter fraud are based on a misunderstanding of voting, statistics or logic.

History

In 2007, before the partisan push for photo-ID’s and Trump’s 2016 and 2020 pre-emptive and post-emptive claims of fraud, the Brennan Institute consolidated the research and concluded that voter fraud was statistically irrelevant, 1 in 10,000 or 1 in 1,000 at the most.

file:///C:/Users/tkapo/Downloads/Report_Truth-About-Voter-Fraud.pdf

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-vote/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraud

NO MATERIAL VOTER FRAUD (Even McConnell)

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/debunking-voter-fraud-myth

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-voter-fraud-facts-explainer-idINKBN2601H5

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-fraud-elections/fact-check-re-examining-how-and-why-voter-fraud-is-exceedingly-rare-in-the-u-s-ahead-of-the-2022-midterms-idUSL1N2XP2AI

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/

https://www.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_8b1382ba-4b0e-4d9c-b933-adcbced94e98

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/ap-review-finds-far-too-little-vote-fraud-to-tip-2020-election-to-trump

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/exhaustive-fact-check-finds-little-evidence-of-voter-fraud-but-2020s-big-lie-lives-on

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

https://www.npr.org/2022/09/04/1120904265/claims-voter-fraud-donald-trump

https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespread-election-fraud-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://www.voanews.com/a/2020-usa-votes_how-widespread-voter-fraud-us/6195819.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/mcconnell-says-voter-fraud-rare-isnt-worried-threats-democracy-rcna44301

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/10/fact-check-8-million-excess-biden-votes-werent-counted-2020/5512962001/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/minuscule-number-of-potentially-fraudulent-ballots-in-states-with-universal-mail-voting-undercuts-trump-claims-about-election-risks/2020/06/08/1e78aa26-a5c5-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html

https://www.snopes.com/tag/voter-fraud-rumors/

https://apnews.com/article/north-america-donald-trump-us-news-ap-top-news-elections-f5f6a73b2af546ee97816bb35e82c18d

YES, Material Fraud

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

https://www.foxnews.com/category/politics/elections/voter-fraud-concerns

Summary

We are blessed with an incredibly low level of election fraud in the US for the last 50 years. With a simple two-party system, partisans from both sides have ensured that fraudulent voting is difficult to do, highly punished if discovered and easy to discover (and therefor highly disincentivized). US voting is largely managed at the lowest levels: counties, cities, precincts, where citizens know their neighbors. It is effective because enough Americans of various political beliefs today believe in this process and volunteer their time to make it effective.

Analysis

Republicans generally take a negative view of human nature, expecting individuals to actively pursue their self-interest. Hence, they expect that Democrats, with influence over the election process in some venues, will take steps to optimize their results. In an earlier age this was partially true. But, in the modern world (post 1920’s), several factors work against this direct pursuit of self-interest. The country’s laws make voting fraud a felony with significant penalties. Local election officials are elected. In a two-party system it is relatively easy to engage both parties to monitor the election process. The US has very many lawyers ready to assist their preferred party. Election results are public. Statistically improbable results are very easy to identify today. Each precinct has a historical preference which is unlikely to change materially in any single election, so any fraudulent voting is easily identified.

Good News: More Retirees

https://www.thevillages.com/

The number of retirees, aged 65+, has increased by more than 50% since 2008, from 20M to almost 31M.

The retirement age population has grown by 4% of the total population in the last 14 years.

The retired 65+ population has grown a little faster than the total 65+ age group. The initial pandemic impact in 2020 was a 5% increase in the retirement rate, indicating about a 2.6M increase in early retirements in 2020.

The retirement rate in 2020 was about 2% higher than the trend, indicating an extra 1.2M extra retirees. The percentage of retired individuals has since fallen back below the trend line.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU05075379#0

The “retired” measure returned (close) to its trend line by June, 2022.

Early estimates of the impact of the pandemic on retirement age workers indicated 2-3 million “extra” workers retired during this time.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/18/business/labor-shortage-boomers-millennials-nightcap/index.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/retirement-covid-pandemic-unretire-labor-shortage/

https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/economic-synopses/2021/10/15/the-covid-retirement-boom

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2021/december/excess-retirements-covid-19-pandemic

https://www.axios.com/2021/10/29/millions-of-baby-boomers-retired-early-during-the-pandemic

Later estimates indicated about 1M early retirements, and then a reversal in late 2021 – 22 as individuals chose to defer their retirements due to the uncertain economic conditions.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/04/amid-the-pandemic-a-rising-share-of-older-u-s-adults-are-now-retired/

https://www.plansponsor.com/study-shows-baby-boomers-pushed-workforce/

Bloomberg noted that new Social Security filings did not increase, so even though there were some retirement candidates with adequate resources to delay claiming Social Security benefits, it was unlikely that there were 3M extra early retirees.

CNBC documented the late Pandemic swing towards more potential retirees deferring this step.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/09/economic-fears-further-retirees-pandemic-era-plans-to-keep-working.html

The Washington Post documented the early retirees returning to work and the variability of retirement choices versus the long-term trend lines.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/05/retirement-jobs-work-inflation-medicare/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/05/retirement-jobs-work-inflation-medicare/

The Washington Post’s approach shows a peak of 2 million extra retirees, falling back to about one-half million in 2022.

Summary

The US economy, political system and social norms have supported the number of aged 65+ retirees growing from 20 million to more than 30 million since 2008. Some of the increase in “retirees” at the start of the pandemic was not voluntary and some retirees have returned to work in the last year as the labor market remains tight and workers worry more about economic conditions. However, overall, an extra 10 million individuals have chosen to retire from active employment and enjoy their retirement years.

Houston, We Have A Problem. Corporate Profit Growth Has No Limit

https://abc13.com/houston-we-have-a-problem-weve-had-remember-when-history/1869513/

Introduction

US Corporate profits grew from $1.9 Trillion(T) on an annual basis in the second quarter of 2019 before the pandemic to $3.0T in the second quarter of 2022; plus $1.1T (+57%)!!! US nominal gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 17%, from $21.3T to $24.9T, an increase of $3.6T. Real, inflation-adjusted, GDP grew by just 4%, accounting for a $0.8T increase in the real economy. Inflation grew by 13%, causing the other $2.8T of measured GDP. The $1.1T of increased corporate profits represents 39% of the inflation which has occurred in the last 3 years.

Analysis

Let’s look at the growth of US corporate profits from a half-dozen starting points to try to put this into perspective.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP

YearProfitReal ProfitAnnl Incr StageCum Annl Incr
197055142
19802732717%6.7%
19954683071%3.1%
20061,3886288%4.5%
20121,8808193%4.3%
20181,947775-1%3.6%
20223,0121,0237%3.9%
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator/consumer-price-index-1913-

US corporate profits reached $3 Trillion in 2022, up from essentially zero in 1950. I’ve selected 7 peak profit years to outline this growth. Nominal profits increased from $55B in 1970 to $3.0T in 2022. In real, inflation-adjusted terms, profits have grown from $142B to $1,023B, a 7-fold increase in 52 years! Annual profit growth has been erratic, increasing by a high of 8% from 1995 to 2006 and a low of -1% from 2012 to 2018. The cumulative annual real profit growth has stayed near 4% throughout the period. 4% compounded for 52 years is a little more than 7x.

The US population grew from 200.3M to 338.3M during this period, 1.0% per year. So, corporate earnings grew by 3% per year above the rate of population growth for 52 years!!!! This kind of compound growth rate cannot continue for long periods of time without greatly impacting other sectors of the economy.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/population

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-06/stock-market-u-s-corporations-hit-record-profits-in-2021-q3-despite-covid?sref=d6fKRvkp&leadSource=uverify%20wall

Corporate profits fluctuated in the 4-6% of GDP range from 1947 through 2000. Profits jumped up to 10% of GDP by 2010 and have largely remained at this two-fold elevated level for a decade. Profits reached a new record of 12% in 2022!

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1Pik
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A466RD3Q052SBEA

This measure shows profits growing eight-fold since 1970. (I’m going to ignore the detailed differences between the various measures of profit. They are important, but not necessary to see the major growth in profits, which is broadly consistent across the various measures.)

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W273RE1A156NBEA

A tighter measure of corporate profits shows an increase from 4.5% to 7% of GDP, even before the most recent profit growth.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A445RE1A156NBEA

An alternate measure of just “domesticly earned” corporate profits shows a flatter trend.

Another way to consider profits is to view its complement, the share of national income received by labor.

https://www.epi.org/blog/the-fed-shouldnt-give-up-on-restoring-labors-share-of-income-and-measure-it-correctly/

By this measure, labor has lost 10% of its income, while capital has gained 10% since 1980.

https://www.epi.org/blog/the-fed-shouldnt-give-up-on-restoring-labors-share-of-income-and-measure-it-correctly/

6% of GDP was moved from labor to capital.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/a-new-look-at-the-declining-labor-share-of-income-in-the-united-states

Consulting firm McKinsey shows an 8% of GDP transfer and provides 5 explanations.

https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/employment-and-social-policy/The-Labour-Share-in-G20-Economies.pdf

Most analyses of the growth in profits and decline in relative wages note that labor productivity has continued to rise by 2% or more annually, but labor has received almost no portion of those gains in the last 30 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_share

Labor share of total income has dropped by 15% in the long-run by this measure.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2017/article/estimating-the-us-labor-share.htm

This author calculates a 6-8% decline for labor.

https://taxfoundation.org/labor-share-net-income-within-historical-range/#:~:text=The%20average%20labor%20share%20from,long%20decline%20in%20labor%20share.

A right-leaning think tank adjusts the data and claims that labor’s share remains constant in the long-run. The Tax Foundation does delve into the various measures of income and provides arguments for their preferred measure.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SP500

Stock prices tend to follow profits. The S&P 500 index has grown by 50% in the last 2 years (despite the recent decline), reflecting the amazing growth in corporate profits during a “once in a century” pandemic driven recession.

https://www.yardeni.com/pub/stmktbriefrevearndiv.pdf

S&P 500 company earnings (a subset of total profits earned) continued to grow strongly through and after the pandemic.

https://cdn.pficdn.com/cms/pgim-fixed-income/sites/default/files/2021-04/The%20Evolution%20of%20U.S.%20Corporate%20Profits_2.pdf

This investment advisor says that profits increased by 5% of GDP.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

Median REAL, inflation-adjusted, earnings remained flat at $330/week from 1979 through 2014, a period of 35 years! This is during periods where profits were growing at 4% per year in REAL terms. In the last 8 years, REAL wages have increased by 9%, a bit better than 1% per year on average.

The media has published many articles, especially noting the increase of profits, overall, since before the pandemic. This is a popular topic because the result is certainly counterintuitive and because President Biden and the more left-leaning national Democrats have been criticizing corporations for “price gauging” and causing the recent inflation spike.

https://fortune.com/2022/03/31/us-companies-record-profits-2021-price-hikes-inflation/

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/corporate-profit-is-at-a-level-well-beyond-what-we-have-ever-seen-and-its-expected-to-keep-growing-11649802739

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/corporate-profits-boom-may-lead-to-higher-wages/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-corporate-profits-stayed-high-through-2021-even-as-inflation-took-hold-160908829.html

A variety of sources provide compelling data and logic to indicate that corporations are “taking advantage of” the post-pandemic inflation caused by supply chain issues and expansive fiscal and monetary policies to boost prices at rates faster than their costs of inputs (suppliers, labor, capital).

https://www.epi.org/blog/corporate-profits-have-contributed-disproportionately-to-inflation-how-should-policymakers-respond/

https://www.wral.com/fact-check-are-corporate-profits-at-record-highs-because-companies-are-overcharging/20068026/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/record-corporate-profits-driving-inflation/story?id=87121327

https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2022/07/corporate-profits-are-increasing-rapidly-despite-increases-in-production-costs/

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/apr/27/inflation-corporate-america-increased-prices-profits

Most economists and analysts point to the increased concentration of firms (fewer) by industry increasing their pricing power and allowing them to raise prices during periods of change.

https://academic.oup.com/rof/article/23/4/697/5477414

https://www.uschamber.com/finance/antitrust/industrial-concentration-in-the-united-states-2002-2017

This is pretty dense and dry stuff. There is a general consensus among economists who focus on this topic that concentration and pricing power have risen very significantly. This is partly due to the simple aging of industries with fewer players left standing. The winners in a world of global competition are simply “much better” than the losers so they continue to take market share. US anti-trust enforcement in the last 40 years has been very limited, following the theory that “open competition” in the long run (Schumpeter’s creative destruction) eventually undermines leading companies with innovative products, processes and market strategies.

The US Chamber of Commerce argues that industry concentration has not increased, noting that consumer choices in broadly defined industries have increased greatly through time.

https://www.uschamber.com/finance/antitrust/industrial-concentration-in-the-united-states-2002-2017

Summary

By a dozen measures, profit has consistently grown as a share of the American economy in the last 40-50 years. This necessarily means that the share of output and income received by labor is much smaller as a percentage of the total pie. The recent surprising ability of American corporations to effectively work through the pandemic supply chain disruptions, lose more than 10% of their labor force, increase nominal wages significantly, encounter severe input price inflation and still engineer price increases to come out much further ahead on profits is a major story for our time.

It is attracting attention to what I believe is an even more important story: the ability of corporations to incrementally capture nearly all of the increased value added by the productive American economy across 40-50 years and share very little with labor. This structural advantage of a very effective corporate sector “doing its job” within the relatively low-tax and low-regulation US political context is now completely proven.

In an ideal world, we would be developing and considering serious policy options that would limit this excess power without “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs”. Unfortunately, the Republican party remains focused on tax and regulation cuts as the main economic tools and the Democratic party alternates between 1960-70’s era Biden “centrist” policies and much further-left Bernie Sanders style policies.