A Very Responsive US Labor Market: 1970 – 2021

https://www.staffordschools.net/Page/20853

This is a follow-up article to my recent post on “A Very Robust Long-term US Labor Market (1970-2021). Rather than focus on total growth or the “skill-level” of jobs in the labor market, I want to focus on the roles or functions (like career clusters, similar to industries) played by the 150 million US workers in 2021. I’ve grouped the 500 detailed occupations into 17 categories so that we can look at subtotals ranging from 1% to 20% of the total, with an average of 16%. Enough detail to highlight the very significant changes in the last half-century.

Let’s start with the 1970 data. 75 million employees. Manufacturing was the “big dog”, with almost 14 million workers, 18% of the total, a little less than one out of five.

Administrative workers, including clerical, HR and accounting staff at all job levels were the second largest group, with 10 million people and 13% of the total, one out of eight jobs. These two traditional categories accounted for 31% of the total, not quite one-third.

The next three groups each accounted for 9% of the total, one of every eleven employees. Sales workers, at managerial, professional and retail/clerical levels. Members of the logistics industry broadly defined, including both transportation and distribution staff. Employees of the construction industry. Once again, classic job functions in 1970 that would have been familiar in 1930.

The narrowly defined “service sector”, combining staff in the food service, travel and personal services industries contained 5.5 million workers, or 7% of the total. These six together included 70% of all workers.

Six other categories were each a much smaller 4-5% of the total: Education (KG-post secondary), Cleaning and Groundskeeping, Health Care, Analysis (finance, IT, operations, engineering and marketing), Ag/Mining and Repair/Installation/Maintenance.

The final five categories each averaged just 1.5% of total jobs: Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, Managers/Supervisors, Protection/Legal, Entertainment/Arts and Relating/Counselors.

By 1970 production agriculture had already declined to an immaterial share of the economy. The historically male and blue collar dominated Manufacturing, Logistics, Construction and Repair categories combined to account for 40% of all jobs; two out of five. The historically more female friendly Administration and Sales functions held 25% of all jobs, one in four. Education was the largest “information industry” at 5%, largely dominated by traditional elementary and secondary school teachers. A more broadly defined service group of food service, travel, personal service, cleaning/grounds and health care summed to 17% of the total, or one in six jobs.

Six categories changed very significantly between 1970 and 2021. Manufacturing dropped from first place to tenth place, from 18% to just 5% of employment, from 14 to 8 million employees. US firms improved labor and overall productivity throughout this period, keeping the most productive firms and factories open, while closing and outsourcing work from the others. This was a tremendous change in the labor market, completed in just two generations of workers.

The Administrative category also declined markedly, from second place to fifth place, shrinking from 13% to less than 9% of total employment, but increasing slightly from 10 to 13 million staff. Process, computer and telecom changes drove improved productivity. Some administrative jobs were outsourced. While the Manufacturing sector lost two-thirds of its labor market share, the Administrative sector lost one-third.

The Ag/Mining group was the third losing category, dropping by nearly two-thirds from 3.9% to 1.4% of all employment. When politicians talk about “reviving” manufacturing, mining or production agriculture they are working against very strong long-term trends.

The largest growth was in the “Analysis” category, which grew by two and one-half times as a share of the total, from 4% to 10%. There was incremental growth in the existing Engineering sub-category, adding 2 million roles. The IT category grew added almost 6 million roles from a base near zero. The operations, finance, marketing analysis group added another 6 million positions to its base of 1.5 million. The “Analysts” category rose from tenth place to first place as firms became more complex and found ways to better employ the talents of individuals with high level analytical skills. At 11% of the economy, one out of every nine jobs falls into the analysis category.

Health Care increased from ninth place to second place, moving from 4.4% to 10.3% of all jobs (2.5X). The number of jobs grew by 13 million, from 3 to 16 million.

The Managers/Supervisors category climbed from fourteenth to ninth place, rising from 1.8% to 5.2% of the economy, adding almost 7 million jobs. The 1970 detailed coding was somewhat different from the modern approach, with many supervisors and managers grouped with other professions or industries. My best guess is that on a comparable basis, the 1970 category would have been closer to 2.5 million than the reported 1.4 million managers and supervisors. This would have put this group in thirteenth place in 1970. Hence, the growth as a share of the total market would be smaller, from 3.3% to 5.2%, but still quite significant. Once again, larger firms with more complexity demanded more managers and supervisors.

In total, we have 20% (1/5 workers) leaving the Manufacturing, Administration and Ag/Mining sectors and 16% (1/6 workers) joining the Analysis, Health Care and Managers sectors.

Comparing the millions of employees in 1970 to 2021 by sector clearly shows the massive changes in the labor market. The Health Care and Analysis sectors leapt from a small 3 million workers each to 16 million workers each. Manufacturing fell in absolute terms from 14 to 8 million workers. The Sales and Service sectors began as large sectors, so their relatively normal growth still added about 8 million roles each. Construction and Administration began as larger sectors and were able to add 3 million employees each, despite slower than average growth rates. Logistics grew slightly slower than the market, but added 6 million workers. Education grew faster than average, adding 6 million colleagues.

Relative growth rates as a percentage of the 1970 base or as a percentage of the total mostly tell the same story. Manufacturing, Administration and Ag/Mining have declined sharply. Analysis, Health Care and Management have grown materially.

The 152 largest detailed occupations and those with the greatest change in employment are documented below. They account for 91 million jobs, 59% of the 2021 total.

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bls.gov%2Fcps%2Fcpsaat11.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

Summary

Economists assert that the principles of comparative advantage drive national economic activity. In essence, nations, firms and individuals rationally do what they are “relatively” best at, which changes through time. We see this reduction in the role of agriculture, manufacturing and mining across long periods in the US.

Economists assert that consumers’ tastes change as they have higher income and the relative prices of goods change. Once basic “food, clothing and shelter” needs are met, people turn to other “needs” and “wants”. These tend to be “services” and we also see this transformation.

Economists assert that profit maximizing firms will employ labor that provides a return on the investment based on the marginal or incremental value added by the labor resource. In a more complex economy, professional and managerial skills are in greater demand. Firms (and not-for-profits and governments) have adapted very well to these major changes in the last 50 years.

These changes are not without major pain to individuals, firms and local economies. The general trends in the economy (more automation, greater trade/outsourcing, more services, more personal care, greater role for analytical skills) are clear. Nations, firms, individuals and regions that adapt to the trends will be relatively successful. This requires wise individual and political choices and investments.

Appendix: Other Reference Articles/Sources

https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/area_emp_chart/area_emp_chart.htm

https://stacker.com/stories/3487/most-common-jobs-america

https://stacker.com/stories/3494/most-common-jobs-america-100-years-ago

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/04/28/americas-most-and-least-common-jobs/8285441/

https://billshander.com/dataviz/occupations/

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat09.htm

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/occupations-decades-100

A Very Robust Long-term US Labor Market (1970-2021)

A Dozen False Claims of Journalists, Analysts and Pundits

Job growth is too slow, there are not enough jobs.

All of the good jobs are gone, there are fewer good jobs.

The only growth has been in “low wage”, service jobs.

There are no “blue collar” jobs, no “hands-on” work is available today.

Jobs are all “dumbed down”, no real content remains.

Automation, computers and artificial intelligence are eliminating all jobs.

There is no room for advancement at work.

The economy is inherently stagnant, firms are unable to create new positions.

We’ve become a nation of shopkeepers.

There’s no hope for millennials in the job market, Boomers are leaving a disaster.

More and more jobs are subject to the “imposter syndrome”, they really do nothing.

This time is different, we have reached the “end times” for jobs.

The Data Says …

The US Census Bureau and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics attempt to measure the detailed occupations in the evolving US labor market. I have selected 1970 as a baseline because it is effectively prior to the “computer revolution” and within my lifetime of observing the labor market. The US economy was still essentially in the post WWII boom period with manufacturing clearly the most important industry in 1970. Prior to Japanese or Chinese competition. Prior to the “energy crisis” and environmental concerns. Prior to improved social, political and economic opportunities for women, racial and other minorities.

We had 153 million people working in the US labor market in 2021.

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

We had 75-77-79 million people working in 1970.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/1984/demo/pc80-s1-15.pdf

The total measures and the detailed measures are somewhat inconsistent between 1970 and 2021. But, they are adequate to make basic comparisons. The labor force doubled in 50 years. 75 million new jobs created! 15 million new jobs each decade. 1.5 million new jobs each year, on average.

The detailed occupation categories have also changed. The 500+ categories in 1970 are very different from 2021, but the basic measures are roughly consistent. I have mapped the 1970 categories onto the 2021 categories. In 1970, the “undefined” responses were in the 10% range and not reallocated back to the detailed occupations as is done currently. Self-employed individuals were measured differently. Managers and supervisors were measured differently. The current definitions are better aligned with the current jobs. The 1970 categories provided much more detail on the manufacturing sector.

Employment by Job Level

Total employment more than doubled.

The highest level “manager/supervisor” jobs category nearly tripled. 18 million manager/supervisor jobs were added between 1970 and 2021. In 1970, there were 10 million manager/supervisor jobs; 13%, or one out of every 8 positions. The newly added positions are 24% of the labor force in 1970. The 28 million current manager/supervisor roles are 37% of the total 1970 work force. Opportunity, indeed. In 2021 terms, manager/supervisor roles are 18% of the work force, more than one of every six positions.

Professional jobs (college degree plus required) also tripled, growing from 14 to 41 million, an increase of 27 million new jobs. This increase is 36% of the 1970 work force. The manager, supervisor, professional subtotal is 23 million in 1970 (31% of the total). It has grown to 69 million (3X) in 2021, reaching 45% of the labor force. The number of “premium” jobs tripled, while the share of “premium” jobs increased by almost 50% in this half-century. Good news, indeed.

“Skilled” labor jobs were flat across 50 years, declining as a share of total jobs by one-half, from 10% to 5% of the economy. However, their neighbor, technical jobs, increased faster than the economy, adding 10 million high quality positions. The combined skilled labor (trades) and technician/technical level positions increased from 15 to 25 million, overall. This two-thirds growth is slower than the overall labor market’s doubling. Hence, this job level decreased from 20% to 16%, or from one in five to one in six positions. This is a “glass half-full or half-empty” situation. The 14% of the total labor market growth for premium positions is offset by a 4% decline in middle skilled positions, resulting in a 10% increase of combined middle and premium positions as a percentage of the total.

Lower skill level jobs accounted for nearly half of all jobs in 1970; 37 of 75 million. They comprised a decreased 39% of the total in 2021, 59 million out of 153 million. A smaller share of “lower skill” jobs seems like progress. Yet, even here, we have a growing labor market, with 59 million jobs in 2021 versus just 37 million jobs in 1970; 50% more.

The “physical labor” category grew from 22 to 32 million jobs, but it declined from 30% to 21% of the work force. Relatively fewer jobs, absolutely more. The clerical workforce encountered a similar, but less extreme change, growing from 11 to 15 million jobs, but declining from 14% to 10% of the work force. The “service sector” grew twice as fast as the overall economy, increasing from 4 to 12 million jobs and from 6% to 8% of all jobs. The “service sector” is growing disproportionately, but it is a relatively small part of the overall economy, just 8% of the total in 2021.

In total, the lower skilled clerical, labor and service groups combined, grew from 37 million to 59 million positions, but declined from 49% to 39% of all jobs. I see this as progress and look forward to the next half century reducing this category to just 30% of all US jobs.

At the detailed level, we have 70 occupations driving 62 million new jobs, 82% of the 1970 base. We also have 27 occupations experiencing a 12 million jobs loss, 15% of the 1970 base. Joseph Schumpeter’s “creative destruction” model of a dynamic economy is validated. Changes in demand and technology eliminated 12 million jobs, 15% of the total, across 50 years. The US economy is capable of permanently destroying and replacing a quarter million positions each year, about one-fifth to one-third of one percent of total employment.

Let’s go back to the dozen negative claims. Is there support in the details? Are there “good” jobs being destroyed? I only see declines due to “natural causes”: improved IT, telecom, process/quality/manufacturing, international trade, railroad, textile automation/imports, ag productivity, printing and DIY office options.

On the upside, what do we see? Management and supervisor roles growing in all areas in a more complex environment with higher sales volume, more products, faster product introduction, more exports, more outsourcing of functions, greater customer demands in all dimensions, global sourcing and competition.

Technology supplemented/infused positions at all levels. Cashiers, customer service reps, distribution employees, tellers and drivers today leverage IT systems and processes.

Increased specialization/technical skill in many service/technical areas. Retail terminals. WMS. HRIS. EDI. Customer service scripts. Web based transactions.

Increased professional skills, sophistication and impact in all areas.

More professional teachers, nurses, analysts, accountants, lawyers, HR, real estate and financial advisors.

Diverse technical computer, automation, lab, design, legal, teaching, culinary and design technical positions.

More medical, food service and personal care service roles.

Summary

In the last 50 years the US labor market has doubled in size and added an increasing share of managerial/professional/technical positions.

In my next blog, I’ll focus on the next level of detail: 17 categories of the US labor market.

Dynamic Labor Market: 1970

Total employment in 1970 was 77M. 4% of that market, 2.8M jobs, essentially disappeared in the next 50 years.

Elevator operators: 1K.

Blast/powder operators: 7K.

Porters, bellhops: 14K.

Auctioneers, hucksters: 12K.

Riveters, blacksmiths, furnaces, forgers, shipfitters: 65K.

Fishers: 74K.

Rail Workers: 216K.

Printers, typsetters, book publishers and news delivery boys: 261K.

File clerks, office machine operators, typists, keypunchers: 2,162K.

Economy: Solid Landing

https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/sticking-landing-us-navy-software-eases-aircraft-carrier-landings

It’s time to revisit the state of the US economy. The media and stock market are overreacting to the positive news today that the US economy added about 250,000 jobs in September. Pundits and investors deem this as a “too hot” labor market which will drive higher inflation and force the Federal Reserve Board to further increase interest rates to slow the economy. We need to look at history, components of the economy and specific measures carefully to evaluate our position.

In a nutshell, the US Congress and President spent so much to offset the pandemic that we have classic inflation from higher demand and lower supply. At the same time, the Fed increased the money supply and lowered interest rates to zero to ensure that the banking sector did not provide a “credit crunch” to businesses or households. Foreign governments and banks acted similarly. This allowed the world economy to work through the pandemic with minor negative effects. However, the boost to the economy was too much and governments and central bankers were slow to reduce the stimulus they provided. The world was tightly focused on “recovering” to the pre-pandemic GDP and employment levels during 2021, so major changes in government spending and the money supply were not implemented until near the end of 2021. By the start of 2022, it was clear that growth was unsustainable and inflation was rising quickly, so policy makers needed to adjust. They have now done so and the impacts can be seen. So far, the economy is slowing, official recession or not, to low/zero growth and looks to remain at that level through the end of 2022 with low/slow growth expected in the first half of 2023.

We can call this a “soft landing”. We can call this a “growth recession”. We can call this a “recession” or a “recessionette”. There is no evidence of a “major recession” with 2% GDP declines or 3% unemployment rate increases or “50% declines” in housing starts or bank lending freezes or massive industry balances to liquidate or … Inflation is high and seems to have peaked. It is not coming down as quickly as most experts (or me) predicted during the first half of 2022, but many factors indicate that we are not in a self-perpetuating inflationary spiral.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1

With the benefit of hindsight, real GDP growth during 2018-19 was somewhat above trend and unsustainable. A 2% excess output doesn’t seem like much, but it does matter. The economy at the end of 2021 was in roughly the same place with 3.5% style unemployment. 4Q, 2021 was more than $1 trillion higher (5%) than 4Q, 2020. 5% real annual economic growth is very rare for a large, modern, developed economy. This was after the immediate pandemic bounce. The 3rd and 4th quarters of 2022 are likely to be reported as essentially flat with the 2nd quarter. Consensus forecast is near zero growth in the first half of 2023, returning to 2-3% growth in the second half.

https://www.conference-board.org/research/us-forecast#:~:text=This%20outlook%20is%20associated%20with,percent%20year%2Dover%2Dyear.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4514734-soft-landing-in-economics

https://www.npr.org/2022/07/24/1112770581/inflation-recession-soft-landing-rates-jobs-fed

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/energy/why-fed-aim-is-growth-recession-a-not-soft-landing/2022/09/01/c85e9eb8-29c3-11ed-a90a-fce4015dfc8f_story.html

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/26/investing/premarket-stocks-trading

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-13/jpmorgan-says-soft-landing-not-recession-base-case-for-markets

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

Federal spending added $2 trillion to aggregate demand in each of the first two pandemic years. In retrospect, too much extra demand.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58416

US government budget deficit will be $2 trillion lower in the fiscal year ending September, 2022. This is good news. The “excess” spending was capped more than one year ago, so the trend rate is part of the current core economy. “Excess government spending” is not driving inflation today. It contributed to the inflationary build-up during 2021 into the first half of 2022 (economic stimulus works with a lag effect).

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEDG
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SAD

The increased money in consumers’ pockets lead to a 30% increase in purchases of durable goods. Consumers had money. They were afraid to consume in-person services. They bought stuff. They’re still buying stuff. The transition from buying goods to buying services has been slower than expected. This has led to extended supply chain disruptions (globally), higher demand for many commodities and increased goods prices which feed higher inflation and higher demand for labor. The total demand for durable goods has flattened and prices have stopped increasing. This is a much-improved situation from late 2021.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT

Consumers did save some of their extra earnings during 2020 and the first half of 2021, but as prices increased and services became available, consumers chose to spend more and reduce their savings rate down to just 4% of income, well below the 7-8% of the prior expansion period. So, part of the “excess demand” in late 2021 was the drawdown of savings. That cannot happen again. It’s possible that low consumer confidence will reduce spending in the next year, but flat spending is more likely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ISRATIO

Most business cycle recessions show a clear build-up and subsequent liquidation of business inventories. Inventories were reduced (involuntarily) in the recovery from the pandemic and have increased a bit since then. There is no current indication of a pending “inventory recession”. In a “zero growth” retail holiday sales season, there will be some eternally optimistic retailers that have to cut prices to move goods, but this happens nearly every year.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WM2NS

The Fed increased the money supply by an historically unprecedented 25% in response to the pandemic. And then by another 10% during 2021. In hindsight, the 25% was too much and the extra 10% was irresponsible. Fortunately, the money supply growth ended by the fourth quarter of 2021 and has remained flat.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US

Mortgage rates were held to less than 3% for 2 years to support the recovering economy. They have now more than doubled, in excess of 6%. These higher interest rates will slow economic activity in many dimensions: lending, home buying, consumer credit, consumer spending, business investment, risk taking, stock prices, etc. Higher interest rates work with a lag to slow economic activity. They were still at “crazy low” rates at the end of 2021. The impact of higher rates is now being felt.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPNHSUS

With extra savings, higher earnings, lower unemployment, restricted services available and historically low mortgage rates, consumer demand for housing grew rapidly while supply increased marginally. Housing prices (and rents) grew by 30%. Demand has now slowed. Housing inflation has slowed, perhaps to zero. This is a major channel through which GDP is decreased and inflation is reduced. Home purchases usually trigger thousands of dollars of additional move-in and fix-up expenditures.

https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/economists-outlook/existing-home-sales-decline-5-4-as-home-prices-continue-to-rise-in-june-2022
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST

Housing sales and new housing starts have adjusted to the new interest rate environment. Note that the level of new housing starts remains above the pre-pandemic level, so some further decline is possible in the second half of 2022.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SP500

The US and global stock markets very quickly rebounded from the initial pandemic fear levels (-25%) back to the pre-pandemic levels which were more than 10% above the 2018-19 trend line. Stock markets increased after the initial pandemic recovery by 50% in line with growing profits. They have since dropped by one-quarter, a combination of lower expected future profits and higher interest rates increasing corporate financing costs and the cost of equity investors’ funds. Lower stock market prices usually have a negative “wealth” effect, with nominally poorer investors spending less in the current economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL#0

By the second quarter of 2021 we started to see 7-10% annual inflation rates. Increases finally slowed (or stopped) in the last 2 months. Reported inflation on a 12 months apart basis will remain above the 2% target level for the next 9 months, as high monthly inflation during the end of 2021 and the first half of 2022 remains in the measurements. Experts have a wide range of inflation forecasts for the first half of 2023, ranging from 3% to 8%. Most expect inflation to be close to the 2% target by the second half of 2023.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PPIFIS
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PALLFNFINDEXQ

Producer price increases followed the same general pattern as consumer prices. They appear to have reached their peak. Producer prices better reflect global prices, especially the higher price of most commodities. Note the 30% increase in US demand for durable goods.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILWTICO
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILBRENTEU

Global energy prices played a significant role in recent inflation. The last few months displayed an easing of prices, but recent OPEC+ decisions to reduce output indicate oil prices rising some again.

https://www.atlantafed.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker

Nominal wages accelerated during 2022, perhaps peaking at 7% annual growth.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

Yet, real wages have been falling for 2 years. We do not have a 1960’s style wage-price spiral.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/07/september-jobs-report-analysis-no-recession-yet/
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSJOL

Job openings were at a historical high before the pandemic and quickly returned to that level by the end of 2020 and then nearly doubled in the next year+ as businesses saw opportunities to profit from the expanding economy, but could not find workers at the somewhat elevated prevailing wage rates. The number of unfilled jobs has dropped by nearly 2 million recently, from 12 to 10 million. The labor market is returning towards “normal”, but with 10 million open positions, the number of net new positions added is likely to increase throughout the fourth quarter, even as the Fed attempts to slow the overall economy.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART

The US labor force participation rate slid from 67% to 66% to 63% from 2000 to 2009 to 2015. It dropped by 1.5% due to the pandemic (61.5%) and has since partially recovered to 62.3%, still a full 1% below the recent peak rate just before the pandemic. The labor market recovery has been good, but not great.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01300060

The core, 25-54 year old labor force participation rate has increased by 1.5% since the pandemic to more than 82.5%, less than one-half percent below the recent high of 83% before the pandemic. By this measure, the labor market is recovering nicely, but not completely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11324230

Retirement age workers have not returned to the work force, with more than 1.5% of potential workers choosing to not join the labor market. Employers will need to be more innovative to attract workers back into the labor market.

Summary

The economy is slowing down, inflationary pressures are easing, but the labor market still looks strong. Slow to zero growth for the prior (3rd) and next 3 quarters is likely as inflation falls from 7-8% to 2-4%. Unemployment rates may increase, but it appears that the total number of employees will increase slowly during this low/zero growth period.

Good News: More Retirees

https://www.thevillages.com/

The number of retirees, aged 65+, has increased by more than 50% since 2008, from 20M to almost 31M.

The retirement age population has grown by 4% of the total population in the last 14 years.

The retired 65+ population has grown a little faster than the total 65+ age group. The initial pandemic impact in 2020 was a 5% increase in the retirement rate, indicating about a 2.6M increase in early retirements in 2020.

The retirement rate in 2020 was about 2% higher than the trend, indicating an extra 1.2M extra retirees. The percentage of retired individuals has since fallen back below the trend line.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU05075379#0

The “retired” measure returned (close) to its trend line by June, 2022.

Early estimates of the impact of the pandemic on retirement age workers indicated 2-3 million “extra” workers retired during this time.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/18/business/labor-shortage-boomers-millennials-nightcap/index.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/retirement-covid-pandemic-unretire-labor-shortage/

https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/economic-synopses/2021/10/15/the-covid-retirement-boom

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2021/december/excess-retirements-covid-19-pandemic

https://www.axios.com/2021/10/29/millions-of-baby-boomers-retired-early-during-the-pandemic

Later estimates indicated about 1M early retirements, and then a reversal in late 2021 – 22 as individuals chose to defer their retirements due to the uncertain economic conditions.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/04/amid-the-pandemic-a-rising-share-of-older-u-s-adults-are-now-retired/

https://www.plansponsor.com/study-shows-baby-boomers-pushed-workforce/

Bloomberg noted that new Social Security filings did not increase, so even though there were some retirement candidates with adequate resources to delay claiming Social Security benefits, it was unlikely that there were 3M extra early retirees.

CNBC documented the late Pandemic swing towards more potential retirees deferring this step.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/09/economic-fears-further-retirees-pandemic-era-plans-to-keep-working.html

The Washington Post documented the early retirees returning to work and the variability of retirement choices versus the long-term trend lines.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/05/retirement-jobs-work-inflation-medicare/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/05/retirement-jobs-work-inflation-medicare/

The Washington Post’s approach shows a peak of 2 million extra retirees, falling back to about one-half million in 2022.

Summary

The US economy, political system and social norms have supported the number of aged 65+ retirees growing from 20 million to more than 30 million since 2008. Some of the increase in “retirees” at the start of the pandemic was not voluntary and some retirees have returned to work in the last year as the labor market remains tight and workers worry more about economic conditions. However, overall, an extra 10 million individuals have chosen to retire from active employment and enjoy their retirement years.

Houston, We Have A Problem. Corporate Profit Growth Has No Limit

https://abc13.com/houston-we-have-a-problem-weve-had-remember-when-history/1869513/

Introduction

US Corporate profits grew from $1.9 Trillion(T) on an annual basis in the second quarter of 2019 before the pandemic to $3.0T in the second quarter of 2022; plus $1.1T (+57%)!!! US nominal gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 17%, from $21.3T to $24.9T, an increase of $3.6T. Real, inflation-adjusted, GDP grew by just 4%, accounting for a $0.8T increase in the real economy. Inflation grew by 13%, causing the other $2.8T of measured GDP. The $1.1T of increased corporate profits represents 39% of the inflation which has occurred in the last 3 years.

Analysis

Let’s look at the growth of US corporate profits from a half-dozen starting points to try to put this into perspective.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP

YearProfitReal ProfitAnnl Incr StageCum Annl Incr
197055142
19802732717%6.7%
19954683071%3.1%
20061,3886288%4.5%
20121,8808193%4.3%
20181,947775-1%3.6%
20223,0121,0237%3.9%
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator/consumer-price-index-1913-

US corporate profits reached $3 Trillion in 2022, up from essentially zero in 1950. I’ve selected 7 peak profit years to outline this growth. Nominal profits increased from $55B in 1970 to $3.0T in 2022. In real, inflation-adjusted terms, profits have grown from $142B to $1,023B, a 7-fold increase in 52 years! Annual profit growth has been erratic, increasing by a high of 8% from 1995 to 2006 and a low of -1% from 2012 to 2018. The cumulative annual real profit growth has stayed near 4% throughout the period. 4% compounded for 52 years is a little more than 7x.

The US population grew from 200.3M to 338.3M during this period, 1.0% per year. So, corporate earnings grew by 3% per year above the rate of population growth for 52 years!!!! This kind of compound growth rate cannot continue for long periods of time without greatly impacting other sectors of the economy.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/population

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-06/stock-market-u-s-corporations-hit-record-profits-in-2021-q3-despite-covid?sref=d6fKRvkp&leadSource=uverify%20wall

Corporate profits fluctuated in the 4-6% of GDP range from 1947 through 2000. Profits jumped up to 10% of GDP by 2010 and have largely remained at this two-fold elevated level for a decade. Profits reached a new record of 12% in 2022!

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1Pik
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A466RD3Q052SBEA

This measure shows profits growing eight-fold since 1970. (I’m going to ignore the detailed differences between the various measures of profit. They are important, but not necessary to see the major growth in profits, which is broadly consistent across the various measures.)

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W273RE1A156NBEA

A tighter measure of corporate profits shows an increase from 4.5% to 7% of GDP, even before the most recent profit growth.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A445RE1A156NBEA

An alternate measure of just “domesticly earned” corporate profits shows a flatter trend.

Another way to consider profits is to view its complement, the share of national income received by labor.

https://www.epi.org/blog/the-fed-shouldnt-give-up-on-restoring-labors-share-of-income-and-measure-it-correctly/

By this measure, labor has lost 10% of its income, while capital has gained 10% since 1980.

https://www.epi.org/blog/the-fed-shouldnt-give-up-on-restoring-labors-share-of-income-and-measure-it-correctly/

6% of GDP was moved from labor to capital.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/a-new-look-at-the-declining-labor-share-of-income-in-the-united-states

Consulting firm McKinsey shows an 8% of GDP transfer and provides 5 explanations.

https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/employment-and-social-policy/The-Labour-Share-in-G20-Economies.pdf

Most analyses of the growth in profits and decline in relative wages note that labor productivity has continued to rise by 2% or more annually, but labor has received almost no portion of those gains in the last 30 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_share

Labor share of total income has dropped by 15% in the long-run by this measure.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2017/article/estimating-the-us-labor-share.htm

This author calculates a 6-8% decline for labor.

https://taxfoundation.org/labor-share-net-income-within-historical-range/#:~:text=The%20average%20labor%20share%20from,long%20decline%20in%20labor%20share.

A right-leaning think tank adjusts the data and claims that labor’s share remains constant in the long-run. The Tax Foundation does delve into the various measures of income and provides arguments for their preferred measure.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SP500

Stock prices tend to follow profits. The S&P 500 index has grown by 50% in the last 2 years (despite the recent decline), reflecting the amazing growth in corporate profits during a “once in a century” pandemic driven recession.

https://www.yardeni.com/pub/stmktbriefrevearndiv.pdf

S&P 500 company earnings (a subset of total profits earned) continued to grow strongly through and after the pandemic.

https://cdn.pficdn.com/cms/pgim-fixed-income/sites/default/files/2021-04/The%20Evolution%20of%20U.S.%20Corporate%20Profits_2.pdf

This investment advisor says that profits increased by 5% of GDP.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

Median REAL, inflation-adjusted, earnings remained flat at $330/week from 1979 through 2014, a period of 35 years! This is during periods where profits were growing at 4% per year in REAL terms. In the last 8 years, REAL wages have increased by 9%, a bit better than 1% per year on average.

The media has published many articles, especially noting the increase of profits, overall, since before the pandemic. This is a popular topic because the result is certainly counterintuitive and because President Biden and the more left-leaning national Democrats have been criticizing corporations for “price gauging” and causing the recent inflation spike.

https://fortune.com/2022/03/31/us-companies-record-profits-2021-price-hikes-inflation/

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/corporate-profit-is-at-a-level-well-beyond-what-we-have-ever-seen-and-its-expected-to-keep-growing-11649802739

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/corporate-profits-boom-may-lead-to-higher-wages/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-corporate-profits-stayed-high-through-2021-even-as-inflation-took-hold-160908829.html

A variety of sources provide compelling data and logic to indicate that corporations are “taking advantage of” the post-pandemic inflation caused by supply chain issues and expansive fiscal and monetary policies to boost prices at rates faster than their costs of inputs (suppliers, labor, capital).

https://www.epi.org/blog/corporate-profits-have-contributed-disproportionately-to-inflation-how-should-policymakers-respond/

https://www.wral.com/fact-check-are-corporate-profits-at-record-highs-because-companies-are-overcharging/20068026/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/record-corporate-profits-driving-inflation/story?id=87121327

https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2022/07/corporate-profits-are-increasing-rapidly-despite-increases-in-production-costs/

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/apr/27/inflation-corporate-america-increased-prices-profits

Most economists and analysts point to the increased concentration of firms (fewer) by industry increasing their pricing power and allowing them to raise prices during periods of change.

https://academic.oup.com/rof/article/23/4/697/5477414

https://www.uschamber.com/finance/antitrust/industrial-concentration-in-the-united-states-2002-2017

This is pretty dense and dry stuff. There is a general consensus among economists who focus on this topic that concentration and pricing power have risen very significantly. This is partly due to the simple aging of industries with fewer players left standing. The winners in a world of global competition are simply “much better” than the losers so they continue to take market share. US anti-trust enforcement in the last 40 years has been very limited, following the theory that “open competition” in the long run (Schumpeter’s creative destruction) eventually undermines leading companies with innovative products, processes and market strategies.

The US Chamber of Commerce argues that industry concentration has not increased, noting that consumer choices in broadly defined industries have increased greatly through time.

https://www.uschamber.com/finance/antitrust/industrial-concentration-in-the-united-states-2002-2017

Summary

By a dozen measures, profit has consistently grown as a share of the American economy in the last 40-50 years. This necessarily means that the share of output and income received by labor is much smaller as a percentage of the total pie. The recent surprising ability of American corporations to effectively work through the pandemic supply chain disruptions, lose more than 10% of their labor force, increase nominal wages significantly, encounter severe input price inflation and still engineer price increases to come out much further ahead on profits is a major story for our time.

It is attracting attention to what I believe is an even more important story: the ability of corporations to incrementally capture nearly all of the increased value added by the productive American economy across 40-50 years and share very little with labor. This structural advantage of a very effective corporate sector “doing its job” within the relatively low-tax and low-regulation US political context is now completely proven.

In an ideal world, we would be developing and considering serious policy options that would limit this excess power without “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs”. Unfortunately, the Republican party remains focused on tax and regulation cuts as the main economic tools and the Democratic party alternates between 1960-70’s era Biden “centrist” policies and much further-left Bernie Sanders style policies.

11 Million Open Jobs! 2 Jobs for Every Applicant

Available Positions

Industry2007 Pos2019 Pos2022 PosAdds
Govt12.212.511.8-.4
Other5.45.95.6.2
Construct7.77.57.6-.1
Manufacturing14.212.812.7-1.5
Mining.7.7.6-.1
Logistics5.06.16.91.9
Education3.03.83.7.7
Health15.320.320.45.1
Leisure13.316.515.11.8
State/Local Educn10.210.410.20
Finance8.48.78.9.5
Information3.02.82.9-.1
Profl Svcs17.820.921.84.0
Retail15.715.615.8.1
Wholesale5.95.85.8-.1
Total137.8150.3149.812.0
https://www.bls.gov/jlt/

Industry2007 Open2019 Open2022 OpenMore Open
Government.3.5.7.4
Other.2.2.4.3
Construction.2.3.4.2
Manufacturing.3.5.9.5
Mining0000
Logistics.1.3.5.4
Education.1.1.2.1
Health.71.21.91.2
Leisure.61.01.61.0
State/Local Ed.1.2.3.2
Finance.3.4.5.2
IT.1.1.2.1
Profl Svcs.91.32.01.2
Retail.5.91.10,6
Wholesale.2.2.3.1
Total3.67.111.26.6
https://www.bls.gov/jlt/

Open Positions as a Percent of Jobs Available

Industry2007 Rate2019 Rate2022 Rate
Government2.43.65.4
Other3.14.07.3
Construction2.23.84.8
Manufacturing2.33.46.4
Mining2.13.85.6
Logistics2.74.87.4
Education Svcs2.42.94.9
Health4.35.48.6
Leisure4.35.79.8
State/Local Ed1.32.03.2
Finance3.54.25.4
IT4.64.76.7
Profl Svcs4.85.78.6
Retail3.05.26.4
Wholesale2.93.55.0
Total3.34.57.0
https://www.bls.gov/jlt/

Open Positions by Industry, 2021-22

The Department of Labor’s monthly survey provides various measures by industry. I’ve broken down the data into 15 industry segments. Eight (8) of these segments account for 5/6ths of all positions and I’ll focus on these 8.

The number of open jobs in the last year, July, 2021 – July 2022, is lead by Professional Services (2.0), Health (1.9), Leisure (1.6), Retail (1.1), Manufacturing (0.9), Government (0.7), Logistics (0.5) and Finance (0.5).

Seven industries accounted for 5/6ths of the increase from 4.6M openings in 2006-7 to 11.2M open jobs today. Health (1.2), Profl Svcs (1.2), Leisure (1.0), Retail (0.6), Manufacturing (0.5), Government (0.4) and Logistics (0.4) are the open job gainers.

The pre-pandemic increase averaged 40% of the total 15-year increase for most industries. The Manufacturing industry showed job declines between 2006 and before the Pandemic, so 80% of it’s openings increase has been since the pre-Pandemic peak. The Business and Professional Services industry has also grown faster since the Pandemic, with 68% of its job growth in recent years. The Retail industry shows an opposite pattern, with 60% of it’s job growth before the Pandemic and a relatively weaker 40% post-Pandemic (on-line sales growth impact).

Total Positions Available by Industry

Total positions increased by 12M, from 138M in 2006-7 to 150M in the last year. Just 4 industries account for all of the growth, lead by Health (5.1), Profl Svcs (4.0), Logistics (1.9) and Leisure/Hospitality (1.8). The migration from ag/extraction to manufacturing to pure services is accelerating.

Open Positions Rate by Industry

The open positions rate more than doubled, from 3.3% in 2006-7 to 4.5% in 2018-19 to 7.0% in the last year. Unfortunately, the larger and growing industry sectors have above average open position rates. Leisure and hospitality shows an incredible/unsustainable 9.8% job openings rate. Professional and business services and Health Care report nearly as high 8.6% vacancy rates. The Logistics industry has a higher than usual rate of 7.4% as it adds jobs at a faster rate in the home delivery era. The Retail and Manufacturing industries show elevated 6.4% open jobs rates. The Government and Finance industries exhibit 5.4% openings rates.

Changes in the Job Openings Rate

The overall job openings rate more than doubled from 2006-7 to the last year, from 3.3% to 7.0%. Keep in mind that 2006-7 was the peak of that business cycle with job openings at a cyclical low point. The Leisure and Hospitality industry had the largest increase, from its usually relatively high 4.3% to an “other worldly” 9.8%. The pandemic drove down travel and it has slowly recovered. The Logistics industry displayed the second highest increase, from 2.7% (it’s usual Manufacturing-like rate) to 7.4% as the Pandemic drove individual shipments to consumers. The Health Care industry continued its labor intensive growth, doubling from 4.3% to 8.6% of open positions. The Manufacturing industry evolved from its usual low 2.3% all the way up to 6.4% as labor demand in other industries grew and attracted its workers. The Professional and Business Services industry kept growing, resulting in a 3.8% increase in unfilled roles, from a typically high 4.8% to a very high 8.6%. The Retail and Government sectors had lower increases at 3%. The Finance sector had a lower than average 2% increase in open jobs.

Just a “Mix” Variance?

The US economy is very dynamic. Industries with low, medium and high job openings rates in 2006-7 each employed about 45M people. The low job openings rate industries (Govt, Manufacturing, Mining, and Educn Svcs) actually LOST 1.4M positions between 2007 and 2022. The middle rate of job openings industries (Logistics, finance, trade, other) added 2.6% net new jobs (1.7M). The high job openings rate industries (Health, Leisure, IT and Profl/Bus Svcs) added an incredible 10.8M jobs (22%)! The US has moved from agriculture to extractive to manufacturing to services employment. The personal and professional services industries are both the fastest growing and the most difficult to staff today.

What Happens During a Mild Recession?

Business and Professional Services openings drop by 3% of the total or 600K people. Health industry jobs decline by a smaller 1% as they are less sensitive to the business cycle, falling by 100K. Leisure and Hospitality are very understaffed and this is harming their growth. They might trim their employment by 2% or 300K positions. The Retail industry is in a long-run decline, so a 2% decline is likely, eliminating 300K jobs. Manufacturing is more cyclical than other industries, so its labor demand will fall more sharply, 3%, removing 400K job postings. The Government sector is somewhat buffered from recession pressures, so job openings might fall just 1% or 100K. Logistics firms are struggling to deliver, so a 2% job decline is the most I see, cutting another 100K positions. The Finance sector has been less volatile, so I estimate a 1% decline and 100K dip.. The remaining industries are likely to fall in tandem, requiring an additional 400K open jobs decline to meet budgets. This total 2.4M open position trim reduces the balance to 8.8M, far above the 7.1M pre-Pandemic level in 2018-19. I don’t think that the labor market will play its usual role in transmitting/amplifying negative finance, banking, housing, international trade, energy and other disruptions through the American economy.

Summary

The US economy was at “full employment” in 2006-7 with just 4.6M unfilled positions. The extended recovery after the Great Recession delivered an even lower unemployment rate, but it also delivered a much increased 7.1M open positions. The post-Pandemic economy has returned to an amazing 3.5% unemployment rate, but the unfilled position count has climbed to a much higher 11.2M and stayed there. The current 7% vacancy rate is largely driven by 6 of the 15 industries with the highest rates: Leisure (9.8%), Health (8.6%), Profl Svcs (8.6%), Logistics (7.4%), Manufacturing (6.4%) and Retail (6.4%). American business is slowly learning to manage with a tight labor very market. Demand for labor should fall significantly in the future as firms employ greater technology, processes, capital goods and imports.

NOT.

US Labor Market: Just Like Living in Paradise

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CE16OV

US labor force employment grows and grows. 60M employed in the very glorious 1950’s. 80M by the end of the dynamic 1960’s. 100M by the end of the transforming 1970’s. 120M by the end of the conforming 1980’s. Not quite 140M by the turn of the millennium (2M shy). Just 140M at the end of the “oughts” decade. 158M before the pandemic, resuming the 20M new jobs per decade record of the sixties, seventies, eighties and nineties in the teens decade.

That is 100 million net new jobs added in my lifetime. 160M, up from 60M.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS

We have two sources, a payroll survey and a household survey. They both tell the same story.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS

A once in a century pandemic? No problem. 27 months later, total employment has been recovered, despite a 20M worker decline! Set aside politics. This is an amazing result for the US labor market, businesses and citizens.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/08/05/business/jobs-report-july-economy

US economy continues to add about 400,000 jobs each month. This is almost 5M jobs per year, more than twice as fast as the usual 2M jobs per year in recent history.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01300060

The labor force participation rate for prime aged individuals (25-54) increased from 65% to 84% between 1950 and 1990 as women were accepted into the labor force. 84% was maintained for a decade and 83% for the next decade. The teens decade saw a decline to 81%. The market has remained in the 81-82% participation rate range.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSHIL

New hires averaged 5M per month in the slower growth “oughts”. New hires dropped further to just 4M per month after the Great Recession. New hires slowly built up to a new record level of 6M per month before the pandemic arrived. The pandemic had just a minor impact on new hires, with a record 6.5M new employees being hired each month in late 2021 and 2022.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSQUR

Voluntary quits averaged 2%, 1 in 50 employees, during the first decade of the 21st century. Quits dropped sharply to just 1.4%, just 1 in 70 employees, in the 3 years afterwards. The quit rate slowly returned to “normal” by 2016 and climbed further to 2.3% as the economic recovery continued for a full decade.

By October, 2021 quits had returned to the solid pre-pandemic rate of 2.3%. The quit rate jumped up to 2.8% by April, 2021 and has remained at this historically high rate.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSJOL

Job openings averaged 4M before the Great Recession. They dropped below 3M during 2009-13. They increased to 5M in 2014 and to 6M by 2016. They remained at the 6M level during 2017, before climbing to 7M for 2018-19. By Jan, 2021 job openings had recovered to 7.2M. By October, job openings had increased to a historic 11M and have remained at this unprecedented level.

This is a greater than 50% increase in open positions since before the pandemic, just 29 months ago. This is 120% more than the peak level before the Great Recession.

Most Important Measure

Profit maximizing businesses, managers and HR departments work through internal processes to list/post a job opening only when:

  1. It’s within the annual financial and headcount budget.
  2. Hiring managers conclude that current staff are unable to serve current demands from internal and external customers.
  3. Hiring managers and financial analysts believe that the incremental hired employees will generate incremental measurable profits.
  4. Hiring managers believe that they can hire new staff using existing processes to fill well defined positions.
  5. Hiring managers believe that it is worth their time to go through the firm’s hiring process.
  6. Hiring managers cannot find an “adequate” labor source through stretching existing staff or using temporary, contract, supplier or agent work forces.

11M job openings means that firms believe that they can generate material incremental profits by hiring up to 11M new employees.

https://www.bls.gov/charts/job-openings-and-labor-turnover/unemp-per-job-opening.htm

11M open jobs is a startling number, but the ratio of unemployed persons to open positions is much more important. The Great Recession created a 6 applicants per job market. This declined to 2:1 in 2014. During the historic extended expansion it declined to just below 1:1, an unprecedented low number. The ratio fell below 1:1 in 2021 to the current 0.5 level. Two open positions for every unemployed job seeker.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE

Unemployment was quickly driven to the pre-pandemic record low of 3.5% this summer. Unemployment was below its usual minimum of 5% for 5 years just before the pandemic, leading most economists to recalibrate the “non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment” (NAIRU) down to 4% or slightly below. This is a very efficient labor market.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q#

Real (inflation-adjusted) wages have reflected this labor market situation. They remained at the $335/week level from 2000 through 2014, reflecting the slow growth of employment and GDP. Wages began to raise in real terms in 2015, reaching $360 by 2019, a 7.5% real increase. Wages were growing rapidly just before the pandemic and climbed to $390/week in the second quarter of 2020, an additional 8% increase in a few months. Real wages have since declined back to the $360 per week level as high inflation has offset higher than usual nominal wage increases. Firms have chosen to live with 11 million open positions rather than increase real wages.

Summary

Firms have 11M open positions that they believe will help them to make greater profits. Real wages are the same as they were just before the pandemic started. Firms have chosen to not increase hiring and regular wages any faster because they judge that this will cost them more profits than allowing 11M positions to remain unfilled. This is the first time in at least 50 years that firms have had to manage a labor market where employees and applicants have some market power. Despite this “standoff” in the labor market, total employment is back to the pre-pandemic level, firms are hiring record numbers of employees and labor force participation is recovering towards the pre-pandemic level, which was at a 10-year high. The overall economy has clearly slowed its growth rate to near zero, but the labor market remains in a very positive state for workers.

Trump Presidency Accomplishments

  1. Tax cuts. Corporate rates cut from 35% to 21%, closer to OECD norms. Incentives for returning profits to US. Higher income tax rate cuts.
  2. Regulation cuts. Environment, business, banking, labor.
  3. Lower environmental standards. Withdraw from Paris climate deal. Methane limits. Wetlands. Vehicle milage and emissions standards.
  4. New limits to welfare benefits: Medicare and SNAP.
  5. Antitrust investigations for telecommunications, media, internet, network advantaged firms.
  6. Increased use of Congressional Review Act (1996) to allow Congress to vote down newly implemented regulations.
  7. Economic recovery continued for 3 more years. 2.5% annual growth. 3.5% unemployment. Stock market gains. 6.5M jobs added. Tighter labor market. Increased wages. Minority and lower income gains.
  8. Bipartisan Covid relief spending for individuals and firms.
  9. Home building increased during Trump term and afterwards.
  10. More “Middle Americans” believed that they were heard and represented.
  11. NAFTA agreement renegotiated.
  12. China relations re-evaluated. Higher tariffs on both sides. Technology limits.
  13. Presidential “bully pulpit” used to maintain some US jobs.
  14. Legislation and executive orders used to support US steel, coal and manufacturing businesses and employment.
  15. Legislation passed to improve visibility to tax shelters and tax fraud enforcement.
  16. Agriculture industry subsidies offered to offset trade costs.
  17. Trade deals with South Korea, Japan and EU.
  18. Enhanced trade policy for communications, IT, technology and AI.
  19. Increased military spending.
  20. Revised defense strategy focused on China and Russia.
  21. Flexed US military muscle in limited attacks.
  22. Actions reduced Islamic State threats to low level.
  23. Supported Israel diplomatic relations with 4 Arab states.
  24. US troops withdrawn from Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq.
  25. Opposition to dictators in Cuba, Venezuela, China and Nicaragua.
  26. Reduced support for international organizations such as WHO.
  27. Built 80 miles of new wall and 300 miles of enhanced walls on Mexico border.
  28. Negotiated improved coordination with Mexico and Central American nations regarding immigration.
  29. Reduced legal immigration from all countries.
  30. Reduced opportunities for asylum seekers.
  31. Used “zero tolerance” family separation policies to disincentivize immigrants.
  32. Removed Affordable Care Act individual mandate.
  33. Streamlined FDA approval process and made financial commitments to ensure rapid COVID vaccine development.
  34. Took steps to reduce drug price inflation.
  35. Invested in opioid drug addiction prevention and correction.
  36. Enacted market friendly policies and regulations to expand domestic energy development, furthering American energy independence.
  37. Supported the bipartisan First Step Act which reduces minimum sentences and supports recovery from incarceration.
  38. Invested in historically Black colleges and universities and vocational education (Perkins).
  39. Made small steps to support “school choice”.
  40. Appointed 3 conservative Supreme Court justices and 225 federal justices.

Trump Presidential Results

Economic Policy

  1. Deficit spending is permanently entrenched. 3-5-7% annual budget deficits do not appear to have major economic downsides in investment crowding out or inflation.
  2. Tax cuts do not generate extra growth, investment, productivity or economic resiliency. They transfer dollars to the recipients.
  3. Concentrated supply chains (China) are subject to significant trade, logistics, military and emergency risks which must be managed.

Foreign Policy

  1. U.S. remains the leading superpower and can pursue its own goals with less allied cooperation and attention to “niceties”, at least in the short run. See NATO, Japan, Korea, climate.
  2. China is the number one competitor.
  3. U.S. and Russia relations are no longer based on Cold War issues. The “Hawks versus Doves” dimension competes with domestic political parties.
  4. Negotiating with nuclear states (Iran, North Korea) is very difficult, even for a superpower.
  5. Europe has its own international interests. It will pursue them. It cannot rely upon the U.S. for its defense.

Domestic Policy

  1. Bipartisan immigration policy may be impossible.
  2. Supreme Court and judicial politicization may drive structural changes/reforms.
  3. Racial relations and inequality will be a top political issue for decades.
  4. Wedge issues – abortion, guns, school content/choice, liberty, gay rights – will remain a focus of both parties.
  5. Traditional social security, Medicare and Medicaid are untouchable.
  6. Obamacare is now essentially untouchable. Lower income citizens will have health insurance.

Democracy at Risk

  1. Legitimacy of media, press, free speech threatened.
  2. Government employees, courts, justice system, law enforcement threatened.
  3. Schools, universities and teachers threatened.
  4. Legitimacy of voting processes threatened.
  5. Illiberal democracy, authoritarianism have more support.
  6. Gerrymandering, voting rules, campaign funding rules undercut public confidence.
  7. Voter participation has increased in response.

Communications Policy

  1. Media attention is priceless and can be manipulated by extreme statements and behavior.
  2. Traditional media “fairness” approach (quotes from both sides) can be manipulated to support unsupportable claims.
  3. Every media outlet or actor has some degree of bias. Consumers are more aware, but many choose to only reinforce existing beliefs.
  4. The president has the opportunity to control/influence the attention of the media.
  5. Facts and objectivity are not respected by some media voices. The pattern of communications statements and framing of subjects can be much more important than content.
  6. Political actors are not held accountable for false claims or exaggerated promises. Claims and promises are just tools to motivate the faithful.

Rules of Politics

  1. President has tremendous power. International agreements. Regulations. Executive orders. Bully pulpit. Political party discipline. Using power seems to have little downside.
  2. Only winning matters. Not popularity, broad support, bipartisanship, appearances, fairness, mud, litigation, critics, impeachment, norms, tradition or relations.
  3. Polarization strategy is more effective than building a central coalition. Motivating your team to vote is more important than persuading independent voters.
  4. Candidate character does not matter. Politicians are salesmen and saleswomen. They are lawyers. They are tools, not statesmen.
  5. Party/team winning is most important factor. 400,000 covid deaths were not enough to spark a revolution. Deaths were traded off against economic opportunity without negative political impact.
  6. Harry Truman’s “buck stops here” responsibility position is not required. No one was responsible for Covid results.
  7. Administrative competence is not required to hold office or to run the federal government (so far). Slow appointments, fast cabinet turnover, acting secretaries, department heads that oppose the role of their departments.
  8. President represents his team and interests, not the whole country.

Party Policy

  1. Philosophical conservatives have departed the Republican party and lost influence.
  2. Moderate Republicans (RINO) have mostly departed, have no political candidates and no influence in the national party.
  3. Extremist groups (race, religion, military, nationalist) are not opposed.
  4. Traditional business interests have much less influence (immigration, social issues, antitrust, trade limits, industrial policy, presidential threats, banking, bailouts).
  5. Pragmatic policies and legislation remain largely unimportant. No party platform for 2020. Everyone in the party “knows” basic positions on all issues. No budget policy debates. No health care alternative to Obamacare. No abortion policy. Statements of preference and intent and belief are more important than wonkish details.
  6. Highlighting the threats and follies of the most leftist Democrats is the most effective means to motivate true believers and maintain support of more independent minded voters.
  7. Only a few federal level policies really matter. Tax and regulation cuts. Social wedge issues. Most other topics can be “managed” with small policy victories and messaging.
  8. Party discipline is essential. Republicans are obligated to support the political winners in their party, not to represent all Republicans or all Americans or to “solve problems”.
  9. Managing the voting system (districts, rules, methods) is as important as policies, candidates, fundraising and communications strategies.

Summary

Trump has revolutionized modern American politics. The Reagan revolution consolidated conservative voters, clearly aligning them with the Republican party. The Gingrich revolution further separated the two parties, emphasizing winning and party allegiance. Republican candidates and voters engaged in a reinforcing cycle of “purist” policy aims such as no tax increases, “drill baby drill” environmentalism, banning abortions, and “bomb baby bomb” anti-terrorism. The Great Recession and the tea party further motivated populist leaning voters to demand populist policies and appeals. Trump modified many historical Main Street and Wall Street Republican policies to make the party better embrace the populist mood and “make American great again”.

Trump’s “only results matter” approach has further transformed the party and the nation. His presidency delivered some key political accomplishments. It also produced many “results” that will shape American politics, economics, society and debate for years to come.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37982000

https://www.pewresearch.org/2021/01/29/how-america-changed-during-donald-trumps-presidency/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/20/trump-promised-his-supporters-everything-he-didnt-deliver-most-it/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/01/18/trump-presidency-administration-biggest-impact-policy-analysis-451479

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/12/2/20970521/trump-administration-achievements

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-legacy-factbox/factbox-donald-trumps-legacy-six-policy-takeaways-idUSKBN27F1GK

https://www.propublica.org/article/the-government-donald-trump-left-behind

https://www.mcleancountyrepublicans.org/trump_administration_accomplishments

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-biggest-accomplishments-and-failures-heading-into-2020-2019-12#failure-covid-19-pandemic-12

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/01/20/trump-legacy/

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-donald-trump-farewell-remarks-f911b5ea84a2b69291aa6f52b9ef6318

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/trump-got-it-done-jack-t-adams/1139526046

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/14/trump-foreign-policy-wins-losses-over-four-years-china-middle-east-coronavirus-pandemic/
https://www.maciverinstitute.com/2021/01/on-policy-donald-trump-was-by-far-the-most-effective-consequential-conservative-since-reagan/

https://www.newsmax.com/bestlists/donald-j-trump-accomplishments-america-first/2021/06/14/id/1025067/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/even-liberals-have-to-admit-trump-had-real-successes-on-the-economy

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-view-historians/

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/29/a-partisan-chasm-in-views-of-trumps-legacy/

https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/trump-legacy-and-its-consequences

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/30/politics/trump-legacy-fake-news/index.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-legacy-analysis-int/analysis-trumps-legacy-a-more-divided-america-a-more-unsettled-world-idUSKBN29P0EX

https://www.cfr.org/article/donald-trumps-costly-legacy

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/20/trump-legacy-how-history-see-presidents-tumultuous-four-years/4158507001/

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-will-trumps-legacy-be-after-leaving-office

https://www.yahoo.com/video/what-is-president-trumps-legacy-203123599.html

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/531734-trumps-legacy-an-enduring-contempt-for-truth/
https://www.brookings.edu/research/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-administration/

Americans, Are You Better Off?

Presidential candidate Ronald Reagan skewered the incumbent Jimmy Carter in the 1980 presidential debate with this question and framing of economic issues.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU6PWT1rVUk

We are economically better off today than we were in 2019, 2016, 2012 or 2008. As a nation, we need to recognize the strong economy that has been built across several 4-year periods.

Let’s focus on just 2 measures: unemployment and real gross domestic product (GDP).

The US encountered its worst or “tied for worst” economic downturn in almost a century in 2008-9 with the Great Recession.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE

The economic recovery was relatively slow, but the economic expansion continued for a RECORD 10 years! This was followed by the pandemic recession which drove unemployment up to 15% in a mere 3 months!! In 2 years, with a never before encountered global pandemic raging and evolving, the US unemployment rate dropped from 15% back to 3.6%!!! It has since levelled off at 3.6%, just shy of the 3.5% rate before the pandemic. This is an AMAZING outcome for the economy and our citizens

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1

Since WWII (1947), the real, inflation adjusted, “no fooling”, GDP of the US has increased TEN-FOLD! We can honor the “greatest generation” and the country’s sacrifices to win WWII, but the economy in the 1940’s was less than 10% of the size that it is today. This is a true “order of magnitude” change. The economy has rotated from agriculture to manufacturing to services and trade.

The real economy is THREE TIMES as large as it was when Reagan was debating Carter in 1980.

It is 25% higher in 2022 than it was in 2008, despite two major recessions.

Unemployment measures the available labor capacity that is unused. The Depression saw extended periods of 20% unemployment. The post-war period enjoyed low 4% level unemployment through 1957. The next 7 years were above 5%, setting a new expectation of what the reasonable, long-term, natural, non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU) was. The next 6 years of Vietnam and social welfare spending drove a 4% average unemployment rate which most economists believed was unsustainable and which eventually drove significant increases in inflation. The 1970 recession drove unemployment above 5% where it stayed for nearly 30 years, before finally starting with a 4 in 1997. Unemployment remained below 5% for 3 years, touching a 4% low before the millennium recession. Unemployment then averaged a sustainable 5%+ for the next 6 years, reaching a low of 4.5%.

So, when unemployment rocketed up to 10% in the Great Recession, no mainstream economist expected it to return to less than 4% soon, maybe never. Unemployment eventually reached 5.0% by the end of 2015. Professional economists were sure that it had reached its bottom. But Mr. Market, Dr. Copper and Senor Economy had news for the pundits. Consistently through the next 4 years, unemployment declined another 30% from 5.0% to 3.5% without triggering increased inflation.

The subsequent reduction of unemployment from 15% to 3.6% in 2 years is an incredible result reflecting a robust economy.

Next, let’s turn to a set of global comparisons to gauge if we are “better off”.

Just 12 Countries Account for 70% of Global GDP

US, China, Japan, Germany, UK, India, France, Italy, Canada, S Korea, Russia and Brazil provide the framework for evaluating global economic results today.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=JP-DE-BR

US Unemployment Rate is Low

India, France, Italy and Brazil are saddled with 7% unemployment rates, double the US level. Canada and China encounter 5% unemployment. The UK, South Korea and Russia enjoy below 4% unemployment rates with the US. Japan and Germany glory in sub-3% rates. The 12 country average is 5.3%, almost 2 points above the US 3.6% rate.

https://www.economist.com/economic-and-financial-indicators/2022/07/28/economic-data-commodities-and-markets

US Inflation Rate is Above Average

The most recent 9.1% annualized US inflation rate is above the 7.7% average. Russia and Brazil are struggling with 10%+ inflation. Canada, Italy, India, UK and Germany face 6-7% inflation. France and South Korea encounter 5% inflation. Japan and China see just 2% inflation.

Combining the unemployment rate and inflation rates to create a “misery index”, the US scores 12.7%, just above the 12.2% average.

https://www.economist.com/economic-and-financial-indicators/2022/07/28/economic-data-commodities-and-markets

The US Remains the “Big Dog” in the Global Economy

At 24% of global GDP, it is first. China and Japan together add up to 24%. The remaining 9 large countries add up to just less than 24%. Being large provides the advantage of a larger domestic market that attracts investors, entrepreneurs, researchers, supplier, labor, traders, etc. On the other hand, continuing to grow in the same percentage terms through history or compared with smaller countries as the largest economy is a handicap. (This is a great graphic worth exploring for a few minutes)

US Leads in Per Capita Income by a Wide Margin

US reports $63,200 per year. Germany, Canada, UK, Japan and France range from $39K – $46K, roughly two-thirds of the US level. Italy and South Korea check-in at $32K, about one-half of the US level. China and Russia earn $10K annually, while Brazil ($7K) and India ($2K) lag further behind.

https://www.investopedia.com/insights/worlds-top-economies/

US Gross Domestic Product Increased 8% from 2019 to 2021

GDP figures are not widely available for the first half of 2022 for countries, so we can use the pre-pandemic 2019 compared with the late pandemic 2021 to gauge recent economic performance.

The US GDP in 2021 was 8% higher than in record breaking 2019. It increased by $1.63 trillion in 2 years. Global GDP in 2021 was $90T. US GDP grew from $21.37 to 23.0 trillion.

China (factory to the world), in a period when demand for durable goods increased by 20% and nondurable goods by more than 10%, grew even faster, from $14.3 to 17.7 trillion, an increase of $3.4 trillion. I believe this is overstated somehow, given other data that indicates 6-7% annual growth in China each year, but it’s first place two-year ranking is clear.

The other 10 major economies combined grew from $26.4 to $27.7 trillion, an increase of $1.3 trillion, totaling less than the US $1.6 trillion growth. Their 5% combined growth rate trails the US 8% growth rate.

In percentage terms, the UK, India and Canada grew by 10% or more. Germany, France and South Korea grew by 8-9%. Russia and Italy grew by 5%. Japan and Brazil endured economic declines.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=JP-DE-BR

US Leads Long-term Stock Market Gains

From the end of 2012 through July, 2022, almost 10 years, the US Standard & Poor’s stock index gained 175%. Fast growing India and previously undervalued Japan reported the same kind of amazing 10 year returns, compounding at more than 11% annually. Germany, France and Brazil grew by a decent 75%. Resource based Canadian and previously overvalued Chinese stocks gained a modest 50%. The UK, Italy and South Korea edged up by 25%, while Russia dropped by 25%.

Stock market returns reflect relative initial evaluations, changes in investor preferences, terms of trade and the underlying profitability/sustainability of each country’s economy. By this measure, the US has a very bright future.

US Leads Short-term Stock Market Returns

Comparing July, 2022 with a pre-pandemic base of December 31, 2019 shows a 25% gain for the US, Japan and India, even with the 20%ish stock market declines in the first half of 2022. Canada and South Korean markets are up a respectable 10%. China and France report a modest 5% gain. Germany and the UK show no gain. Italy, Russia and Brazil are in the 10% loss range. Even with strong gains from 2012 through 2019, the US stock market lead the world through the pandemic recovery period.

Summary: Very Solid US Economy

US inflation has returned to threatening levels and consumer confidence has fallen sharply while confidence in the incumbent president has continued to decline. The current “mood” is negative despite many positive economic factors such as the labor market and growth in GDP, housing and stock values. We are having journalistic, academic and partisan debates about hanging the “recession” label on the economy.

Big picture, the US economy is in great shape. It continues to grow, employ labor, increase wages, export, generate profits and build asset values. The economy worked through a “once in 100 years” global pandemic, with limited long-term economic damage.

There is a risk of a recession, even a moderately painful 3-5% downturn. There is a risk that inflation will remain elevated for more than 1 year, reducing the value of wages and assets. But these are normal business cycle issues, not the “end of the world”. The responses of consumers, investors, suppliers, businesses, bankers, central bankers, regulators and … politicians to the last two recessions were constructive and helpful. We have the ability to work through our current economic headwinds if we choose to do so.