Good News: Traffic Fatalities Decline

Year Deaths/100M miles B Miles M Population Miles/Person

1940 11 300 132 2,200

1950 7 460 152 3,000

1960 5 720 181 4,000

1970 5 1,100 205 5,400

1980 3 1,530 227 6,700

1990 2 2,140 249 8,600

2000 1.5 2,750 282 9,700

2010 1.1 2,970 309 9,600

2019 1.1 3,220 327 9,900

Motor vehicle fatality rate in U.S. by year – Wikipedia

Between 1940 and 2010, traffic fatalities per mile travelled declined by 90%!!! This is an amazing story that received/receives limited media coverage. Year by year the death rate declined. Not as sensational as a single fatal crash; all of which were covered.

At the human level, this is great news. 90% fewer deaths. Less loss of humanity. Less loss of human potential. Fewer children without parents. Fewer funerals.

This reflects several positive drivers. Better cars. Auto manufacturers investing in safety. Fewer older/unsafe cars on the road. Better government regulations. Better driving. Better drivers training. Better policing. Better maintenance. Better roads. Better expectations. Better media coverage. Limited access highways. More roundabouts. Better signage. Better maps. Americans believe in “continuous improvement” and make it happen.

Unsafe at Any Speed – Wikipedia

It also shows the greater mobility/freedom of American citizens. The miles travelled per person increased 5-fold in 60 years. Greater freedom of choice. More options for work, goods, services and leisure. More travel baseball. More vacations. More weekend trips. More visits with relatives.

2019 Fatality Data Show Continued Annual Decline in Traffic Deaths | NHTSA

In 2020, we have had a temporary reversal of the long-term trend, driven by bad driving on empty roads. This WAS covered by the media.

Pandemic travel: Traffic deaths up 8% in 2020 despite driving less (usatoday.com)

Driving Was Down In 2020, But Traffic Fatality Rates Surged : NPR

The rapid growth of safe travel in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s was captured in popular media.

Top 25 Car Songs of All Time as Voted by the HOT ROD Readers

My boomer favorites (enjoy):

BEEP BEEP ~ THE LITTLE NASH RAMBLER ~ The PLAYMATES ~ ANIMATION – YouTube

Golden Earring – Radar Love (1973) – YouTube

409-the Beach Boys – YouTube

william devaughn – Diamond In the Back – YouTube

Deep Purple – Highway Star 1972 Video HQ – YouTube

hot rod lincoln – YouTube

Ronnie & The Daytonas – ‘Little GTO’ – YouTube

Indiana: Red State

In presidential elections since 1960, Republicans have won 14/16 races. LBJ won 56% of the vote in 1964. Obama won 50% of the vote in 2012. Democrats earned just 33-38% of the vote in 6 of those elections, including 2016. Democrats earned only 40-42% of the vote in 4 elections, including in 2020. The median Democratic result is 41%.

United States presidential elections in Indiana – Wikipedia

Indiana leans Republican in surveys of party affiliation. Voters do not permanently register for a party. They declare a party only when they vote in each election. According to one survey, Indiana voters are tied for 18th most Republican leaning. Indiana has just 42% of voters reporting as strong or “leaning” Democratic.

Party affiliation by state – Religion in America: U.S. Religious Data, Demographics and Statistics | Pew Research Center (pewforum.org)

In the last 6 presidential elections, 15 states have always voted for Democrats and 20 states have always voted for Republicans. Indiana is part of the 15 in the mixed middle due to the Obama result. Indiana has not been highlighted as a “swing state” in recent years.

Blue and Red States (270towin.com)

Indiana has elected 10 different governors since 1960, with Republicans serving 10 of the 16 terms (63%), including each of the last 5.

List of governors of Indiana – Wikipedia

Since 1984, the results have been similarly divided, with 6 Republican and 4 Democratic terms. From 1988-2000, Evan Bayh and Joe Kernan won 71/92 counties (77%), on average. In 2002, Mitch Daniels won his first term with 53% of the vote, but carried 73 (79%) of the counties. This broad geographical Republican dominance has continued, with Democrats winning just 13, 19, 13 and 3 counties in the last 4 elections. When Mike Pence won with 50% of the vote in 2012, he carried 73 counties. When Eric Holcomb won with 51% in 2016, he carried 80 counties.

1984 Indiana gubernatorial election – Wikipedia

At the U.S. Senate level, Indiana has elected 10 different senators, with Republicans serving 13 of the 22 terms (59%). Democrat Joe Donnelly was replaced by Republican Mike Braun in 2019.

List of United States senators from Indiana – Wikipedia

Since 1960, Republicans have won 42 of the 68 congressional races (62%). Since 2000, the median party split has been 7 Republicans and 2 Democrats. This balance has been consistent in each of the last 5 terms. Democrats did hold a small 5-4 advantage in 2006 and 2008.

List of United States representatives from Indiana – Wikipedia

2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Indiana – Wikipedia

The Indiana Senate has been controlled by Republicans since 2009, with Democrats holding an average of only 22% of the seats.

Indiana Senate – Wikipedia

The Indiana House is closer to the overall 40% +/- Democratic population, with Dems holding an average of 31% of the seats in recent years. The concentration of Democrats in a relatively small number of counties drives some of this situation.

Indiana House of Representatives – Wikipedia

Since 1970, Marion County and Indianapolis have been combined into a common City-County Council and Mayor system, usually termed unigov. Since Mayor Lugar’s first term in 1968, Republicans have held the mayor’s office for 16 of 26 terms (62%). Democrats have held office for 10 of the last 14 terms (71%).

List of mayors of Indianapolis – Wikipedia

The City-County Council has been a competitive body. Democrats held a 15-14 majority in 2003. Republicans lead 16-12 in 2007. Democrats resumed the majority by 16-12 in 2011, and more narrowly by 13-12 in 2015 when the “at large” districts were removed. Democrats won a large victory in 2019 of 20-5. It is unclear if this lopsided result will continue in the future.

Since Obama’s surprising presidential win in 2012, metropolitan Indianapolis area Democrats have become more active, with more candidates running for suburban offices, more financial and volunteer support and a few of them winning. This has been newsworthy, because many suburban counties and cities had zero or only nominal Democratic candidates historically. Joe Biden narrowly won some precincts in the 2020 presidential election, generating more news coverage.

2020 Election: How Trump, Biden performed in Hamilton County, Indiana (indystar.com)

However, Biden’s relative progress in the Indianapolis suburbs, like his results in other U.S. suburbs, did not translate into Democratic gains in the state and local races, where Republicans consistently outperformed Trump and won races by margins significantly higher than pollsters forecast.

Indiana elections: Dems see few wins as still sign for optimism (indystar.com)

Indiana election results: Democrats look for answers after losses (indystar.com)

The 19 counties that voted for John Gregg (D) against Mike Pence (R) in the close 2012 race account for 43% of the state’s 2019 population. That is consistent with 43% in 2010 and down a little from the 44% share in 2000. The Democratic leaning counties are not growing faster than the Republican leaning counties.

Indiana Democrats like Evan Bayh, Joe Kernan and Joe Donnelly appear to be unable to re-assemble a winning “blue dog” coalition of voters at the state level. Barrack Obama’s narrow 1% point victory over John McCain and Sarah Palin looks like an “outlier” result. Indianapolis seems to be an increasingly solid base for the party and its suburbs may fall from 70% to 55% Republican through time. However, for the foreseeable future, Indiana will be a solid Republican (Red) state.

Indiana: How Much Political Power?

Indiana is the 17th largest U.S. state ranked by population, with 6.7 million residents.

Indiana’s GDP is the 18th largest. Its GDP per capita is only 32nd.

List of states and territories of the United States by GDP – Wikipedia

Indiana has 11 electoral college votes, tied for 13th most of all states. Indiana did not lose an electoral college vote in the latest census, although 3 neighboring states did. With 538 total votes, the average state has almost 11 votes, so Indiana is average by this measure. From 1872-1926, Indiana had 15 electoral votes. From 1932-40 it had 14. From 1944-88 it had 13. From 1984-2000 it had 12, so the trend is clearly downward.

Indiana Presidential Election Voting History (270towin.com)

Indiana has not been a “swing” state with disproportionate clout in our lifetime.

Party affiliation by state – Religion in America: U.S. Religious Data, Demographics and Statistics | Pew Research Center (pewforum.org)

Indiana can claim its fair share of U.S. presidents. 1 out of 46, with the 23rd president, Benjamin Harrison (1889-93). Indiana can partly claim Harrison’s grandfather William Henry Harrison who briefly served as the 9th president and who served as governor of the Indiana Territory from 1801-12, although he was not born there. Indiana also claims to be Lincoln’s boyhood home (1816-30).

Indiana also has its fair share of losing presidential candidates with Wendell Wilkie (1940) and Socialist Party stalwart Eugene Debs (1900-20).

Indiana Presidents: Learn About the 3 Hoosiers Who Became President (visitindiana.com)

Indiana truly stands out at the VP level, with 4 serving in this office: Charles Fairbanks (1905-9), Thomas Marshall (1913-21), Dan Quayle (1989-93) and Mike Pence (2017-21). It has provided 12 VP candidates.

Witnessing History: Hoosiers for President (indianahistory.org)

At the Supreme Court, Indiana claims more than its fair share of the 120 justices with 4: Willis Van Devanter (1911), Sherman Minter (1949), current Chief Justice John Roberts (2005) and recently appointed Amy Coney Barrett (2021).

A quick look at U.S. Supreme Court Justices from Indiana « Capitol & Washington (capitolandwashington.com)

Since WWII there have been 35 individuals serving in the top political appointment office, the White House Chief of Staff. Ron Klain currently holds that role, as the only Hoosier to do so.

White House Chief of Staff – Wikipedia

Historically and recently, Indiana has shown above average political influence at the national level in the U.S.

Indy, Throw Me the Whip!

We moved to Indy in 1988 from Cleveland by way of Dallas. My wife was transferred to Indy by her employer and I was able to transfer with my employer. We visited for one weekend, noted the quietness and bought a house. We expected to stay for 3 years. We’ve stayed for 30 years.

Once we moved, we saw that Indy presented a “can do” atmosphere that was more like Dallas than like Cleveland. What does the population data say?

From 1970 to 2019, the Indy 9 county area grew from 1.2M to 2.0M people. The growth from 1970 to 1990 was negligible, a little more than 100K in 20 years. But each of the next 3 decades added 200,000 people, more than 10% growth each decade.

On a ranking of metro areas, Indy started in 29th place and has fallen 4 notches to 33rd place, so on that measure it has lost some ground.

Comparing cities across time is complicated, as the census bureau definitions change, but the data tells some stories. I restricted the comparison to the 64 cities that were “top 50” for at least one of the last 7 decades. 5 dropped out by 1970: Scranton, Youngstown, Syracuse, New Haven and Knoxville. 9 dropped out more recently: Dayton, Akron, Albany, Toledo, Rochester, Omaha, Bridgeport, Tucson and Honolulu. No big surprises. Tucson and Honolulu remain close to 50th place. 8 cities grew into the top 50: Virginia Beach/Norfolk, Tampa/St. Pete, Charlotte, Orlando, Raleigh, Austin, Riverside and Las Vegas.

For the US as a whole, 14 cities dropped 8 or more places, 6 dropped 4-7 places, 10 gained 4 or more places and 12 had small changes in rank (+/-3). By this measure across nearly 50 years, the median city dropped 4 places, the same as Indy, so it can claim an average growth rate during this time.

Looking at just the Midwest, Indy looks much better. 6 cities dropped out of the top 50. 6 dropped 8 or more places: Cleveland, Milwaukee, St. Louis, Kansas City, Cincinnati and Detroit. Minneapolis joins Indy at -4 near the top of this group. Columbus, OH nearly maintained its 31st place rating, slipping to 32nd. Chicago kept its 3rd place ranking.

Other “comparable” central U.S. cities include Buffalo (-26), Pittsburgh (-16), Louisville (-13), Memphis (-8) and Nashville (+11).

The bottom line is that Indy is holding its own at the national level and overperforming in the heartland.

List of metropolitan statistical areas – Wikipedia

From Naptown to Super City – Aaron M. Renn (aaronrenn.com)

Good News: Measured Intelligence Increases Through Time

One of the most depressing books was written in 1998. It argues that we are not genetically equipped to face the abstract thinking challenges of modern life. We have to make individual choices in all areas of life (parenting, religion , mates, ethics, groups, politics). We cannot simply rely upon our parents or culture. I think there is some relevant content in this work.

In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life: Kegan, Robert: 9780674445888: Amazon.com: Books

Robert Putnam’s works on “Bowling Alone” and “Our Kids” tell a similarly frightening story. We used to have a broad based commitment to community and ethical behavior, but we have lost our way, especially in the bottom half of the social structure.

Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis: Putnam, Robert D.: 9781476769905: Amazon.com: Books

Other research indicates that general intelligence (IQ) as measured by standardized testing has increased decade by decade in statistically significant amounts. Better diet, better schooling, better media, better home life, better chemical environments. The improvements are mainly in the bottom half of the scores. We’re not seeing twice as many 800 SAT scores. This is great news for these individuals and for society. IQ measures are imperfect. Intelligence is not closely correlated with ethics. Intelligence is only one part of problem solving. There are clearly multiple intelligences and talents that are useful. All people take shortcuts and make irrational decisions. But … an increase in basic intelligence scores and reasoning abilities is something to celebrate.

Intelligence – Our World in Data

Smarter than ever? (apa.org)

Has humanity reached ‘peak intelligence’? – BBC Future

Flynn effect – Wikipedia

Hamilton County Growth, 1970 – 2020

 County Populations, 1970-2020, US, Indiana and Hamilton 
 The US population has increased by 64% in the last 50 years, from 202 to 330 million. 
 Indiana has grown by half as much (30%), while Hamilton County has increased five-fold (527%). 
 US growth was in the 10% range for the first 4 decades, but has slowed to just 7%. 
 Indiana has grown by only 5% per decade, with a strong 1990’s offsetting a weak 1980’s. 
 The US has added roughly 25 million net residents in each decade. 
 Indiana has grown by 300,000 residents per decade, on average. 
 Hamilton County added 25,000 people in each of the first 2 decades and 75,000 in each of the last 3. 
 Indiana has declined from 2.6% to 2.0% of the country’s population, from 1 of 39 people to 1 of 49.’ 
 Hamilton County’s % of the US population has nearly quadrupled, reaching 0.1%, or 1 in 1,000 of US residents. 
 Half of the U.S.  lives in just 144 of 3,143 counties. 
 The US has a staggering 3,143 counties.  
 An ABC (pareto) analysis shows relative stability of the population distribution across the decades. 
 Just 60 counties (2%) account for one-third of the population in each decade. 
 One-half (50%) of the population lives in just 144 total counties (5%). 
 70% of the people live in just under 400 counties (12.5% or 1 in 8). 
 80% live in 22% of the counties (the classic Pareto 80/20 rule).  680 counties, on average. 
 The 70% and 80% groups have seen a somewhat tighter clustering of counties through time. 
 90% of the people live in 40% of the counties. 
 The last 10% of people live in the complementary 1,900 counties (on average). 
 The number of counties in the last 10% has grown from 1,820 to 2,011 in 2020 and an estimated 2,071 in 2030. 
 So, in general, the top half of population remains grouped in just 144 counties. 
 The 50th-90th percentile is more concentrated in 1,100 versus 1,300 counties. 
 The final 10% is more spread out across an extra 200-300 counties worth of space. 
 7 largest counties contain as many people as the bottom 2,021 (33 million). 
 As the country’s population has grown by 64%, the minimum county population size required to belong to  
 each tier (33%, 50%) has grown similarly.   The smallest county in those comprising 33% of the population 
 has increased by 46% from 626K to 914K in 2020. 
 The 70th percent group minimum has more than doubled from 89K to 182K. 
 The 80th and 90th percentile groups have similarly increased, from 48K to 99K and 23K to 42K, respectively. 
 This is another way to show that smaller counties with populations of 50K or less are even further 
 removed from the relatively small number of counties (610, 22%) that hold 80% of the total population, 
 with a minimum 99K population in 2020. 
 The 2,011 smallest counties in 2020 have a total population of 33M, averaging 16,000 residents. 
 The 143 counties that account for half of the population (5X), average 1.15M people each, or 70X as dense. 
 The 7 largest counties hold 33M people, the same as the 2,021 lowest population ones. 
 Twice as many counties with 1 million people since 1970. 
 This increased population density can be seen in actual population figures as well. 
 The country had 22 counties with 1M people in 1970.  24 cities have reached this milestone in the last 50 years. 
 These are mainly the primary counties of metropolitan areas, but some are large suburbs (Oakland, MI;  
 Collin, TX; Fairfax and Montgomery, DC; San Bernardino and Riverside, CA). 
 The growth can be seen at the 250K and 500K levels, with a total of 277 counties now holding 250K+ residents. 
 There are a few more counties in the 25K and 50K tiers, but the sub-25K group has 361 fewer counties in 2020. 
 Indiana county populations have been relatively static. 
 With it’s relatively slower population growth, Indiana has seen only moderate growth in its county profile. 
 Indiana had 23 counties with 50K+ residents in 1970, and a few more (27) in 2020. 
 Marion County is the largest, above 500K since 1970, reaching 970K in 2020. 
 Lake County exceeded 500K in 1970, but slipped below that level in 1983. 
 Allen County has exceeded 250K residents throughout this time, reaching 485K in 2020. 
 St. Joseph County reached 250K in 1992 and 272K in 2020. 
 7 Indiana counties exceeded 100K in 1970 and remain at that tier: Elkhart, Tippecanoe, Vanderburgh, 
 Madison, Delaware, LaPorte and Vigo. 
 5 counties reached the 100K level after 1970: Porter (76), Monroe (81), Johnson (95), Hendricks (00), Clark (04). 
 Hamilton County passed 100K in 1988 and 250K in 2006, holding 345K residents in 2020. 
 Indiana added 1.6M residents, but 30% growth is only half the national average. 
 Indiana grew by 1.6M residents across these 50 years; 30%.  Less than one-half of the national growth rate. 
 The growth is very different across the 92 counties. 
 5 counties gained 99,000 residents or more.  This totaled 788K.  The 63% matches the country’s growth. 
 9 counties gained 30-98K residents, adding 511K residents.  The 82% growth rate exceeds the nations. 
 These 14 counties combined added 1.3M residents, with a growth rate of 69%. 
 Unfortunately, these counties were responsible for 83% of the total Indiana population growth in 50 years. 
 The other 78 counties, with 3.3M residents in 1970, recorded 3.6M people in 2020, for just 8% growth. 
 Hamilton County is the fastest growing Indiana county, adding 290,000 residents since 1970. 
 Hamilton County has been the fastest growing county in Indiana across the last 50 years. 
 It added 290,000 residents from a base of just 54,000; barely in the top one-fourth of Indiana counties in 1970. 
 During these 5 decades, Marion, Hendricks, Allen and Johnson counties added 178, 119, 102 and 99K residents. 
 Hamilton County added 25,000 residents in both of the first 2 decades and 75,000 in each of the last 3 decades. 
 Hamilton was the 21st largest of 92 Indiana counties in 1970. 
 It quickly passed 5 of its counterparts in each of the next 3 decades, reaching 6th place in 1999. 
 Passing Floyd, Bartholomew, Johnson, Wayne and Grant counties as it reached 82K by 1980. 
 Passing Howard, Clark, Vigo, LaPorte and Monroe counties as it reached 110K by 1990. 
 Passing Delaware, Madison, Tippecanoe, Porter and Vanderburgh counties as it reached 172K by 1999. 
 Hamilton County passed Elkhart County in 2000 and St. Joseph County in 2008. 
 Hamilton County will pass Allen County for 3rd place in 2026-2029 at 400K. 
 Hamilton County will pass Lake County for 2nd place in 2037-39 at 463K. 
 Hamilton County is in the top 300 U.S. counties by population. 
 Hamilton County has quickly risen in the overall US county rankings, from 621st in 1970 (20th percent) 
 to 296th in 2000 (10th percent) to 209th in 2020 (7th percent).   
 The competition is greater at the top, but 7K annual population growth is likely to continue for the next 20 years 
 leading to 415K in 2030 and 486K in 2040, and ranks of 195th and 174th. 
 From 1990 to 2020, Hamilton County grew from 110K to 345K; 213%. 
 It was the 69th fastest growing county in these 30 years, in the top 2% of all 3,100 counties. 
 79 counties grew by 2/3rds (156K) to 3/halfs (352K) of this 235K (213%) in this 30 year period. 
 These were mostly high performing counties, averaging 100% growth during the period. 

Organizational Structure

If you deeply believe in the primacy of the process paradigm, work to overhaul your organization’s structure.

Following the input-processing-output structure, oranizations should be organized to maximize cross-functional results. Five direct reports to the president.  Perhaps a sixth direct report managing the functional specialist areas of design engineering, marketing, sales, process engineering, HR, finance, accounting, operations, quality, customer service, purchasing, IT, etc as support functions.

1. Organizational strategy (I, P and O): planning, analysis and control.  Finance/accounting, quality and strategy folks build the superstructre of long-term strategic plans, business unit reporting, value added, How does the overall system work effectively?

2. Supply chain management (I).  Purchasing, scheduling, materials control, distribution, logistics team adopts a strategic view incorporating the needs of product development, engineering design, manufacturing, purchasing, marketing, sales, and operations.

3. Customer Management (O).  Sales, marketing, customer service and technical service in every market.

4. Product management (P).  Product managers supported by marketing and engineering.

5. Operations (P).  Manufacturing, distribution, reverse logistics, HR, IT, quality, process engineering, transacrion accounting.

Note that each of these 5 areas requires cross-functional experience and understanding.  We are 236 years past Adam Smith’s writings about functional  specialization and 175 years past David Ricardo’s deep insights regarding comparative advantage.  Darwin posited the process paradigm for natural events 150 years ago.  Dr. Deming promoted this view 60 years ago for manufacturing.  

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two_Cultures

CP Snow outlined the different worldviews of scientists and humanities majors in 1959, but he could have been describing the different worldviews of all professions.  Breaking through to see the bigger or contrasting picture is the most important insight.

http://www.peacecorps.gov/wws/educators/lessonplans/lesson.cfm?lpid=295

The Blind Men and the Elephant story provides the same insight.  A single perspective is inherently limited and flawed.  A comprehensive view is beter.

 

Lean Six Sigma Resources

Out of the Crisis, W. Edwards Deming, 1982

Chapters 1-2, 6-9, 11 and 16 provide a good introduction to the science of variability and quality.  The author’s unique personality makes this a memorable work, even though some content is repeated and some of the author’s personal views must be ignored or discounted.

 

The Goal, Eli Goldratt and Jeff Cox, 1984

This 300 page novel illustrates how a sequence of variable events operates and how it can be managed effectively.

 

The Toyota Way, Jeffrey K. Liker, 2004

Chapters 1-4, 7-20 describe the power, principles and components of the Toyota Way.

 

The Six Sigma Way, Peter S. Pande, Robert P. Neuman and Roland R. Cavanaugh, 2000

Chapters 1-5 provide an executive overview of Six Sigma and why a firm might invest in this approach to operations excellence.  Chapters 6-11 outline a common approach to staffing and organization.  Chapters 12-18 provide a high level overview of the major tools and processes used in Six Sigma.

 

The Six Sigma Handbook, Thomas Pyzdek and Paul Keller, 3rd ed., 2010

Chapters 1-4 outline the management of a Six Sigma organization and projects.  Chapters 5-12 provide a comprehensive explanation of Six Sigma tools and techniques.  A modest amount of technical statistics is included.  Often used as a textbook for Six Sigma black belt courses.

 

Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbox, George, Rowlands, Price and Maxey, 2005

Quick reference guide to 100 commonly used tools.  Best used by individuals with lean six sigma training and experience or significant statistics background.

Lean Six Sigma Components

Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a term which describes a complementary set of tools and insights used to improve business processes.  It is based upon the statistical understanding of variation and the sequence of steps in a process.  It provides a comprehensive approach to setting business goals, improving processes and delivering results.  It builds upon the modern quality movement and the Japanese manufacturing emphasis on process flows.  It includes ISO 9000 standards for quality assurance within an overall management system.  It takes a long-term view of processes, investing in measurements, staff skills, feedback systems and the pursuit of near perfect goals reflecting customer needs.  The insights and tools originated in manufacturing firms, but are successfully applied to many business processes, functions and industries.

A mature Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation commonly has six distinct components: a comprehensive quality management system, operations measures and goals integrated into an overall planning and control system, a supplier management program, a supply chain management system which integrates suppliers, internal processes and customer processes, process improvement projects and a product development process.

The comprehensive quality management system is designed to meet the ISO 9000 standards.  At all levels and functions, processes are defined, measured and improved.  The “Plan, Do, Check, Act” improvement cycle is used.  “Say what you do, do what you say, be able to tell the difference” forms the basis for decentralized continuous improvement.  Quality control, quality assurance and quality cost programs are implemented.  Senior and functional managers understand and support the role of quality, measurement and improvement.  Front-line employees learn quality concepts and tools and begin to apply them effectively.

Standalone quality management systems have a history of becoming technical functional silos or disappearing due to lack of support.  Successful LSS initiatives proactively define company level operations measures to meet perceived customer needs.  These measures are integrated into some version of a balanced scorecard that includes financial, customer, operations and asset measures.  Operations measures cover the customer goals of quality, speed, flexibility, value, information and personal service (QSFVIP).  The limitations of purely financial measurement systems are overcome.  Process improvement projects are prioritized together with other capital investments and strategic initiatives.

Organizations soon discover that they are constrained by the limitations of their suppliers and undertake supplier management programs.  They translate their customer goals into supplier goals.  Formal supplier qualification, scorecard and preferred supplier programs are implemented.  Supplier management coordination is centralized.  Individual supplier goals and improvement programs are defined.  Overall company goals and improvement programs are defined.  The quality supplier management program is enhanced.  Organizations adopt the supplier perspective as a complement to the product and financial perspective.  The supplier base is consolidated.  Supplier assets and risks become strategic management factors.

Purchasing, sourcing, freight, distribution and customer service functions are aligned, combined and upgraded within a formal supply chain management process.  Internal processes are revised to more directly and effectively meet core and exceptional customer needs for products and services.  Organization level delivery goals are defined for product availability, on-time shipping and recovery.  Future goals are defined and investments are made to reach these goals.  Internal capacity and cycle times are elevated in importance.  Customer requirements are translated into supplier requirements.  Lead-time, capacity, on-time shipping and minimum order quantity improvements are requested of suppliers.  Forecasting and MRP systems are modified to deliver what they can.  Investments are made in creating “just-in-time” supply systems.

Process improvement projects are formalized.  Quality, industrial engineering, purchasing, accounting, IT and project management professionals learn Lean Six Sigma skills and work with functional staff to define process improvement opportunities.  Projects are divided into continuous process improvement, Kaizen quick-fixes and total process re-engineering projects.  Typically, physical processes are addressed first, followed by transaction and support processes. 

Finally, product development is formalized as a well-defined and consistent process.  Standard development stages, approval gates and documents are defined.   Cross-functional teams, roles and participation are emphasized.  Business justifications support business requirements which are translated into technical requirements.  The clear project scope allows for a project task plan and timeline to be defined.  Templates, forms and guidelines are used to systematize the collection, review and sharing of key information.   The statistical principles of variability and queuing theory are used to effectively manage various functional resources in the portfolio of active development projects.

In summary, Lean Six Sigma takes a probability and statistics approach to managing and improving repetitive tasks and sequences of events.   It does not diminish the importance or value of the individual tasks which are often the province of functional experts.  It does not discount the importance of staff management, but highlights the limits of motivational approaches.  It does not ignore the need to handle exceptions or the value of exceeding customer expectations, but emphasizes the value of consistently meeting negotiated customer requirements.   It does not dispute the need to set and achieve short-term financial goals, but focuses on long-term improvements to meet escalating customer expectations.  It does not challenge the value of improving individual operations steps, but notes that only final product delivery earns customer value.

 Lean Six Sigma directly challenges the common sense view that the whole is the sum of the parts.  It emphasizes processes that span suppliers, all internal functions and customers.  The process view (including quality and customer perspectives) often differs from the functional, financial or product views.  Effective managers learn to integrate these perspectives to make superior business decisions.

Lean Six Sigma Benefits

A Lean Six Sigma (LSS) approach to operations management delivers many benefits:

  1. A comprehensive operations management system, processes and staff aligned with organizational priorities through a balanced scorecard.
  2. Engaged staff who understand what actions deliver customer satisfaction and increase long-term profits.
  3. An improved root cause oriented decision-making process that includes all functional perspectives.
  4. A system which naturally identifies potential process improvement projects.
  5. Improved supplier loyalty and willingness to invest in customer success.
  6. Satisfied customers, sales growth, pricing power and a more effective sales force.
  7. Less fire fighting.  Exceptions are managed effectively with less negative impact.
  8. Increased ROI from the existing ISO 9000 infrastructure.
  9. Finished goods defects below 1%.  Defect rates cut in half.
  10. Total cost of quality cut in half, especially scrap, waste and rework.
  11. Individual process quality levels are measured so that risks are understood and managed.
  12. Customer expectations are made explicit, holding operations accountable for delivery and limiting the power of individual staff or customers to lobby for exceptional (unprofitable) results.
  13. Delivery cycle times are reduced by 33-80%, with clear understanding of process capabilities to avoid overpromising.
  14. Consistent on-time delivery improves from 98% to near 100%.
  15. In-stock product availability increases from 95-97% to 99%.
  16. Peak period delivery capacity doubles.
  17. Real conversion cost per unit improves by 2-3% per year.
  18. Product costing better reflects the real cost of low volume products.
  19. Buying and selling transaction costs are reduced by 50%.
  20. Risks are reduced through process definition, staff engagement, cross-training and supplier experience.
  21. A constructive culture is built which engages staff in continuous improvement towards near perfection goals in quality, delivery time, capacity, cost, product variety, transaction costs, risk management and customer engagement.