Tag: trade-offs

Negotiating Work-Life Balance

tomkapostasyLeave a comment

During the Great Recession the balance of influence has shifted markedly towards employers.  Labor productivity increased throughout the two years, in contrast to prior recessions when it declined.  Productivity increased because employers were unwilling to replace departed staff and found ways to motivate the remaining staff to redistribute the work load.  Unless firms were already over-staffed by 5% or suddenly found new ways to identify and eliminate activities, this delegation of work is unsustainable in the long-run.  Far-seeing firms and their best employees have a common interest in helping staff to improve their ability to negotiate a healthy and realistic work-life balance.  Firms which push too hard will eventually experience costly turnover.

Many firms tend to push too hard and then back off as needed.  Determining the breaking point for staff is more art than science.  Employees at every level – hourly, salary, manager, director and VP – have an important obligation to push back constructively.  Especially in the United States, where we have embraced the long-term benefits of free market capitalism without the need for balancing social values or government regulation, every employee has a responsibility to attain the work-life balance that optimizes their happiness.   Wise managers will coach staff in this direction while at the same time asking for more!

Employees need to deliver and focus on long-term value, establish personal goals, delegate, prioritize, evaluate options, negotiate and employ proper tactics.  

Employees need to actively participate in identifying ways to deliver 3-5% productivity improvements each year.  This is the price of admission to the modern labor market.  These short-term and long-term actions deliver the value required for organizational survival.  They outline a program of activities that allows managers and staff to minimize the number of reactive initiatives undertaken.

Employees need to establish their own values, mission and goals.  Without countervailing forces, the need to earn an increasing income will always prevail.  A personal life plan is required to provide a counterbalance to the unlimited requests of firms today.  Staff members need to accept that everyone is replaceable and that some day they will be gone and the firm will move on without them.  They also need to observe that most senior managers have found ways to balance their own personal objectives.  

Staff members need to become world-class delegators, moving work down the hierarchy and to supplier partners.  Individuals who constantly attract and retain new responsibilities will become overwhelmed.

Staff members need to deeply understand that there are an infinite number of goals and an infinite degree of performance that can be requested.  This applies to employees at all levels.  It is an inherent component of the employment relationship.  Employee goals need to be prioritized.  Modern firms understand that they must emphasize product innovation, customer intimacy or operations excellence.  They also know that customers desire varying levels of quality, speed, flexibility, value, information, risk and personal relations.  They know that income statement and balance sheet goals, short-term and long-term measures, financial and operational goals, accrual and cash-flow results all matter but with different priorities.  They understand the trade-offs between risk and reward.  Employees must work with their managers to explicitly prioritize what matters most and to set goals based upon achievable results.

Employees need to negotiate their annual and immediate goals.  The quality revolution has highlighted the need to base goals upon defined capabilities, instead of top-down requirements.  Employees need to master prioritization in setting annual, monthly and daily goals.  Employees, managers and the finance department need to understand that there is an optimal degree of stretch in targets and budgets.  Employees and managers need to understand that there ARE short-term trade-offs between cost, quality, speed, flexibility, risk, relations and brand perceptions.

Employees need to be effective tacticians.  Annual SMART goals need to be realistic.  Staff members need to flex their schedules to meet peak demands and address unexpected events.  They need to recoup this time in slow periods. 

In a challenging environment, every employee needs to understand their role and negotiate achievable objectives that help their firm to thrive.

Banking in Bedford Falls

tomkapostasy1 Comment

As the Great Recession moves along into its third calendar year, the focus in Washington is on “Financial Reform”.   The backlash at Democrats and Republicans alike over the “bank bailout” continues to grow.  The politicians are posturing to allocate credit for the so-called reforms, but seem destined to “give the people what they want”.  It might help the politicians and the people if there was a shared understanding of the inherent factors universally at play in the home lending market.

I propose that everyone take an evening off and watch the classic 1946 film “It’s a Wonderful Life”, starring James Stewart as George Bailey, the initially reluctant but eventually heroic, manager of the Bailey Building & Loan Association in Bedford Falls.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It’s_a_Wonderful_Life

The essentials of banking are exhibited in this film.  Bedford Falls is the whole universe.  All of the actors know one another.  The cast is composed of depositors, owners, board members, bankers, borrowers, regulators and landlords. 

There are inherent conflicts between the roles.  Depositors don’t really trust the bank as shown by the bank run.  Landlords would like to see lending restricted to boost rents.  The owners are motivated by self-interest (enlightened or not) and set policy accordingly.  The board seeks a trustworthy banker to be its agent, and provides incentives to attract and retain him.  The banker has fiduciary and personal motives.  The regulators enforce the laws, unaware of all key facts.  The borrowers want loans, even if they can not afford them, in order to escape the costs of the landlords.  People act out of self-interest.  They respond to incentives.  There are trade-offs to be evaluated and decisions to be made.

A bank fills a valuable social role, attracting deposits in order to lend money.  A bank profits by the spread.  A bank is in business to lend money whenever it sees a profitable opportunity, irrespective of the moral concerns of owners, depositors or borrowers.  Banking is subject to real risks such as bank runs.  Banks are subject to poor decisions by bankers, mistakes by employees and fraud by anyone involved in any transaction. 

Historically, banks have operated by the 4 C’s of credit: capacity/cash flow, capital/collateral, conditions and character.  This is especially effective in a small town such as Bedford Falls.  Although George and the audience might hope that every citizen should qualify for a loan, some may not have the earnings to cover the principle, interest, insurance and maintenance of a home.  Some may not be able to save for a down payment to create adequate collateral.  As business conditions change, the income of the citizens is at risk and the ability of the bank to manage its affairs fluctuates.  A banker with a long-term perspective and proper incentives adjusts lending accordingly.  Finally, character counts.  Past financial and personal performance are good predictors of future performance.  Character is part objective and part subjective.

Even in this simplified setting, risks abound.  Public pressure for universal home ownership can result in too many loans.  Regulators can enforce laws mechanically while missing larger problems.  Institutional knowledge can be lost through staff turnover.  A single fraudulent act can threaten a bank.  Changing external business conditions can disrupt the bank.  Lending policies can be too loose or too tight.  Business judgments can be wrong.

The film delivers an escapist, idealist, overly simplistic view of life.  Mr. Potter is the evil bank owner and plotting, fraudulent landlord.  George Bailey is the selfless hero.  Yet, behind the scenes, we have a social institution performing a social function.  We need banks to provide the social function of collecting deposits, allocating credit and collecting from borrowers.  In spite of the vastly more complex institutional structures today, the role of a “building & loan association” is essentially the same.  As a society, we allow these institutions to connect savers and borrowers across varied time frames because this is a necessary function.  Our laws and regulations should be based on this real-world understanding, not upon the simplistic dualism of “good and evil”.