Civility: I Will Survive

Sagrada Familia, Barcelona.

Civility faces many challenges to survive and thrive. It possesses many advantages.

Conceptually

They say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.
The umbrella terms liberal and conservative are inadequate to political dimensions and individuals.
Despite DEI politics, most Americans support diversity, equal opportunity and acceptance.
Thought leaders realize there is no alternative to Civility for a modern society to function.
We define “certainty” for science and religion. We have post-Newton insights in the last 100 years.
We understand “victim” language. We can help ourselves and our friends to reject this burden.

Logically

Civility encourages us to accurately diagnose the current situation.
Despite political extremism, instrumental logic and facts rule the scientific and business worlds.
Civility is designed to be nonpartisan, allowing political parties to embrace this approach to effectiveness.
The 7 Civility values are equally attractive to liberals and conservatives.
Civility is able to promote public-spiritedness without leaning left.

Morally

The Civility behaviors are mostly consistent with human nature. The rest can be taught.
In a time of advanced technologies and artificial intelligence, focusing first on human dignity is wise.
While Civility focuses on behaviors and a few values, it can be driven by more emotional values.
We better understand the benefits and limits of tolerance and its role as a social value.
Most people see the costs of extreme individualism to themselves, family, neighbors and coworkers.
By highlighting the habit of skepticism, we can greatly reduce its poisonous impact.

Progressively

The track record of modern society solving problems is very strong.
Our world has an increasing experience base of finding both/and descriptions and solutions.
We do have a long track record of reducing our perceptions of “the other” as a threat.
We have more experience outsourcing government functions to reduce the sense of intrusion.
The change is based on incremental improvements rather than heroic efforts and projects.
Modern communications capabilities can effectively promote moderate, complex, less emotional positions.
As Robert Putnam documents in The Upswing, we have revised our social institutions before.

Powerfully

Civility is supported by a super majority of independents, Republicans and Democrats.
Corporations need Civility to operate complex organizations. They will recruit, train and reward Civility.
Civility embraces a wide diversity or political and religious beliefs.
Civility is supported by many churches, businesses, professions, universities and governments.
Leaders of Europe’s more secular democracies strongly embrace Civility.
There is no fundamental opposition to Civility by China’s leaders.
Civility is strongly supported by the major religions.
The 7 Civility values are supported by all major religions and philosophies.
Unquestioned religion or scientism are dead. Better insights and communication are possible.
The Catholic church can strongly support Civility.
Protestant churches can support Civility without overemphasizing “social justice”.

Politically

Societies have always had political differences. Our differences are no greater than in history.
In the American 2-party system, the center normally has extra political weight.
Political parties, groupings, ideologies and polarization naturally change through time.
We have 50 years of post-60’s social policy debates. We know that we will always disagree on some things.
The diversity of states allows the benefits of federalism to accrue with better policies emerging.
The reliance of the classical liberal political model on shared values is better recognized.
The unintended consequences of politically extreme policies become obvious in time.

The impossibility of extreme political parties/factions delivering on their promises becomes apparent.
Ironically, liberals have become “cultural conservatives”, promoting a 250-year-old approach.
Liberals increasingly see the value of allowing states to determine social and economic policies.
Some liberals see that 100% enforcement of social policies drives strong opposition for little benefit.
Broadly defined insecurity has become a political priority that will generate nonpartisan solutions.

Educationally


Modern cognitive science, counselling and organizational behavior are highly effective.
By defining Civility as a set of behaviors, we make it teachable, actionable and leverageable.

The Civility lessons are straightforward, allowing many to lead workshops.
Solid Civility lesson plans can be developed in many places and used everywhere.
We can fine-tune and package hundreds of Civility training exercises to serve everyone.
Organizations and individuals can rely upon counselling, groups and training.
We can greatly improve our school curriculums to teach Civility as a solution to real differences.
Civility is practiced and improved in all arenas of life. Improvements are leveraged.

Virally

In a highly specialized world, there are more opportunities to apply Civility “win-win” principles.
Civility is not an “all or nothing” set of behaviors. Incremental progress is normal.
The more challenging Civility behaviors can be practiced in safer, local environments.
Local expectations of Civility allow all individuals to apply and grow these behaviors.
Civility can be practiced in any environment without permission from anyone.
Civility skills, values, beliefs can be developed and applied without any approvals.
The virtuous cycle of Civility applies at levels. Good behavior or feedback drives more good behavior.
The practice of Civility generates “positive externalities” for others. The state should support it.
The practice of Civility provides a role model for others to emulate.
Social norms are very powerful. Most people learn them implicitly.
Civility behaviors can become habits which then apply without thought or effort.

Beneficially

Every person can serve as a Civility ambassador, champion or “civiliteer”.
High-level Civility skills are personally and professionally highly valuable.
The Civility emphasis on self-awareness and values clarification can improve quality of life.
Humans have much in common and can learn this.
Americans have much in common.
We understand “human nature” deeply, so can adjust to leverage strengths and patch weaknesses.
Americans are proud of their political system and will invest in Civility to preserve it.
Civility’s focus on human dignity supports the modern high importance of personal identity.
As individuals seek validation of their identities, Civility can help to facilitate good conversations.
Our greatly improved understanding of behavioral economics provides new policy opportunities.

Summary

The modern approach to improving and installing Civility as a major social norm is audacious, yet it has great support.

Support for Civility as a Social Norm

Civility acts as a social norm by functioning as an unwritten contract of voluntary restraint, respect, and mutual recognition that governs interpersonal behavior, fostering trust and social cohesion. It serves as a navigational tool for social interaction, prioritizing the common good over self-interest.

  • Foundation of Mutual Respect: Civility is the recognition of the humanity and equality of others, demanding respect regardless of differences.
  • Behavioral Guidelines: Unlike polite etiquette, it is a deeper disposition involving empathy, patience, and honesty.
  • Social Cohesion: It reduces friction and prevents conflict, acting as the “glue” that allows diverse people to live peacefully.
  • Voluntary Constraint: Civility serves as a form of self-discipline and self-control, curbing harmful impulses without the need for legal force.
  • Function in Public Life: It enables productive, respectful disagreement and dialogue in communities and democratic life.

Several organizations and initiatives aim to establish civility as a social norm to reduce polarization and foster respectful discourse. Key groups include the National Institute for Civil Discourse, Braver Angels, the Institute for Civility, and the Civility Project, which focus on promoting respectful dialogue in political, public, and private spheres.

  • National Institute for Civil Discourse (NICD): Focuses on bridging political divides and promoting polite, constructive discourse in politics.
  • Braver Angels: A major organization working to reduce political polarization by fostering constructive dialogue between citizens with opposing views.
  • Institute for Civility: A non-profit dedicated to promoting civility in government, workplaces, and schools, aiming to build a more respectful society.
  • The Civility Project: Founded by journalists to help people with stark differences maintain healthy, respectful relationships.
  • National Civility Network (NCN): A collaboration of centers and institutes working on civic engagement and addressing political dysfunction.
  • Millennial Action Project: Engages young lawmakers to build bipartisan coalitions and promote a more collaborative political culture.
  • The Center on Civility and Democracy (CCD): Part of the Ronald Reagan Foundation, it promotes civil discourse and common ground.
  • SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management): Promotes workplace civility as a strategic imperative to create productive, positive cultures.

These groups often focus on transforming polarization into engagement, enhancing interpersonal relationships, and strengthening democracy through “internal constraints” of respectful communication.

[1] https://www.ncsl.org/state-legislatures-news/details/groups-help-lawmakers-pursue-civility-and-bipartisanship-the-unicorns-of-politics

[2] https://www.instituteforcivility.org/who-we-are/mission-and-vision/

[3] https://www.pbs.org/wnet/preserving-democracy/video/remain-civil-from-political-opposites-to-friends-the-civility-project-was-born/

[4] https://www.publicbooks.org/civility-and-or-social-change/

[5] https://www.reaganfoundation.org/civility-and-democracy

[6] https://www.instituteforcivility.org/

[7] https://nicdresearch.org/national-civility-network/

[8] https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/topics/civility

[9] https://www.shrm.org/content/dam/en/shrm/topics-tools/topics/civility/shrm-workplace-civility-handbook.pdf

[10] https://modernagejournal.com/why-civility-precedes-the-social-contract/235645/

A broad spectrum of Christian denominations, including Catholics, Lutherans (ELCA), Presbyterians (PCUSA), and many Evangelicals, support making civility a social norm, often framing it as “Christian civility”. These efforts focus on applying the Golden Rule and neighborly love to public discourse, emphasizing dignity, respect, and constructive engagement over political polarization.

Key groups and campaigns promoting this include:

  • [United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB)]: Launched the “Civilize It: Dignity Beyond the Debate” campaign, urging respectful dialogue in politics and community.
  • [Evangelical Leaders (NAE)]: The National Association of Evangelicals and leaders like Richard Mouw emphasize “uncommon decency” and treating others—including opponents—with dignity, believing this is a core Christian conviction rather than just good manners.
  • [Mainline Protestant Denominations (ELCA, PCUSA, Episcopal Church (USA))]: The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and Presbyterian Church (USA) have supported initiatives like “Golden Rule 2020: A Call for Dignity and Respect in Politics”.
  • [Interfaith & Ecumenical Coalitions]: Various leaders, including those involved in “[A Covenant for Civility],” span across political lines to promote civil, safe spaces for public discourse.
  • Quakers
  • Black Church Traditions
  • Mennonite Church USA

[3] https://tomkapostasy.com/2026/02/03/christianity-supports-the-7-civility-values/

[5] https://sojo.net/articles/covenant-civility

[6] https://blogs.elca.org/advocacy/the-paradox-of-civility/

[7] https://www.nae.org/civility-starts-in-church/

[8] https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/10/04/christians-return-to-core-convictions-make-america-more-civil-column/3845002002/

[9] https://www.nae.org/love-civility/

[10] https://njcatholic.org/civilize-it

Several states, through their legal, governmental, and bar associations, are actively working to mak civility a social and professional norm. Illinois, California, Texas, Colorado and Utah are noteworthy. Half of state legal associations include civility oaths.

The Council of State Governments is promoting “Service with Civility”.

2025 Civility – The Council of State Governments

Several state municipal associations have launched formal campaigns, pledges, and initiatives aimed at making civility a social norm in local government and public discourse. These efforts, often in response to rising polarization, focus on restoring respectful dialogue in council meetings and community interactions.

Key state municipal associations leading this effort include:

  • Georgia Municipal Association (GMA): In 2023, the GMA launched the “EMBRACE Civility” program in partnership with Georgia City Solutions to equip cities with resources, including a civility pledge and the “9 Pillars of Civility,” to combat incivility in local government. Numerous Georgia cities have been recognized as “Cities of Civility” through this program.
  • Municipal Association of South Carolina (MASC): MASC formally rolled out its civility initiative in 2022, naming the restoration of civility in local government a top priority. Their initiative urges local leaders to adopt civility pledges and resolutions in their council chambers, focusing on collaboration and consideration.
  • Illinois Municipal League (IML): The IML promotes a formal “Civility Pledge” to ensure communication between local elected and appointed officials remains open, honest, and transparent to build trust.
  • Pennsylvania Municipal League (PML): The PML has a dedicated “Civility Campaign” that encourages officials to sign a pledge to foster civility in the delivery of public services.
  • North Carolina League of Municipalities (NCLM): NCLM operates a “Commit to Civility” program that certifies municipal boards that complete training and commit to fostering respectful discourse in their communities.
  • Colorado Municipal League (CML): CML promotes “Civility Starts Here” principles, encouraging local leaders to focus on issues rather than individuals, listen actively, and manage emotions during public meetings.
  • Florida League of Cities (FLC): FLC offers training and resources for local governments to adopt civility pledges and meet ethics standards to foster better communication between officials and the public.

Note: The National League of Cities (NLC) also provides a national framework supporting these state-level actions, with many of its leaders hailing from the associations listed above.

Several professional associations, particularly in law, psychology, and management, actively promote civility as a social norm to improve discourse, workplace culture, and public health. Key organizations include the American Bar Association (ABA), American Psychological Association (APA), SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management), and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA).

Key Professional Associations and Initiatives

  • American Bar Association (ABA): Promotes civility as a core pillar of legal professionalism, issuing guidelines and training for attorneys to maintain respect, dignity, and courtesy in legal practice.
  • American Psychological Association (APA): Emphasizes civility, inclusion, and respect for dignity to foster better communication and professional environments.
  • SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management): Advocates for civility in the workplace, emphasizing empathy and respect to improve organizational health, performance, and employee engagement.
  • International City/County Management Association (ICMA): Partners in efforts to address the decline of civility in public discourse and governance.
  • Community Associations Institute (CAI): Implements a “Civility Pledge” for community associations to foster respectful interactions and responsible leadership.
  • National Civility Network (NCN): A coalition of academic centers dedicated to promoting civil discourse in public life.

Numerous universities actively promote civility as a core social norm, incorporating it into campus culture through specialized initiatives, codes of conduct, and dedicated community standards. Key institutions focusing on this include Carnegie Mellon University, Old Dominion University, Arcadia University, Stony Brook University, and Winston-Salem State University.

Key University Civility Initiatives & Policies:

  • Carnegie Mellon University (CMU): The Civility Initiatives strive to foster a community of dignity, conflict resolution, and mutual respect.
  • Old Dominion University (ODU): Civility: The Monarch Way focuses on building a safe, respectful environment, prohibiting bullying and harassment.
  • Stony Brook University: Emphasizes civility and civil discourse alongside diversity, caring, and respect.
  • Arcadia University: The Statement on Civility
    highlights respect, empathy, and responsible behavior.
  • Winston-Salem State University (WSSU): The Office of Community Standards & Civility promotes integrity, accountability, and respect.
  • Johns Hopkins University: Features the Civility Initiative, established to promote dialogue during polarized times.
  • Florida State University (FSU): Highlights a civility statement stressing the “dignity and worth of each person” and encouraging respectful disagreement.
  • Colby Community College: Includes specific conduct guidelines to curb toxic behaviors such as public hostility, ridicule, and name-calling.
  • Jamestown Community College: Implements classroom civility
    guidelines focused on fostering a safe environment.
  • University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC): Incorporates a Code of Civility in its student handbook.

[2] https://www.odu.edu/equity/civility

[3] https://www.arcadia.edu/about-arcadia/offices-facilities-services/student-affairs/civility-campus/

[4] https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/civility/

[5] https://www.wssu.edu/student-life/community-standards-civility/index.html

[6] https://www.colbycc.edu/policies/general-employment-workplace/civility.html

[7] https://www.sunyjcc.edu/employees/classroom-civility-faculty-guide

[8] https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-health-equity/2024/civility-in-times-of-social-polarization

[9] https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/student-life-and-support/student-handbook/civility-code

[10] https://sccs.fsu.edu/about-us/civility-statement

[11] https://ncrconline.com/galinson-campus-civility-program/

Some Republicans support civility as a social norm to maintain democratic stability, foster productive governance, and encourage respectful dialogue over political hostility. It is seen as a way to promote traditional values, enable compromise, and, for some, shift focus away from personal attacks toward policy, enhancing both social cohesion and political accountability.

Key reasons for supporting civility include:

  • Democratic Order and Stability: Civility is seen as essential for upholding democratic decorum and stabilizing the boundaries of conflict.
  • Effective Governance: Many believe that civility is crucial for bringing lawmakers together, reducing political hostility, and finding solutions through, rather than in spite of, differing viewpoints.
  • Encouraging Respectful Discourse: Supporters argue that civility promotes listening, understanding, and respectful treatment of others.
  • Reinforcing Traditional Values: Civility often aligns with the promotion of respect, personal responsibility, and traditional social conduct.
  • Political Strategy: Some studies suggest that advocating for civility can be a strategic move to focus on policy differences rather than identity politics, which can be beneficial in certain political environments. [

While a large majority of Republicans (85%) have regarded civility as very important, there is nuance in how it is interpreted, with some emphasizing it as a necessary reduction in political toxicity, while others may view the push for it as a distraction from deeper policy debates, or as a way to control the political narrative.

Some Republicans support making civility a social norm because they view it as a practical tool for effective governance, a protector of democratic stability, and a reflection of core conservative values like respect for authority and human dignity. They argue that without a baseline of mutual respect, the “American experiment” is threatened by hyper-polarization and potential political violence.

Some Democrats and institutionalists support elevating civility to a social norm to preserve democratic institutions, promote constructive political discourse, and counter rising polarization. Proponents argue that civility fosters trust, enables compromise, and protects democratic processes from authoritarian threats by emphasizing shared common purpose over confrontational, hyper-partisan politics. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Key reasons for supporting civility as a social norm include:

  • Protecting Democratic Institutions: Supporters believe adherence to decorum and norms keeps government functional and resists democratic backsliding.
  • Encouraging Compromise: Civil discourse is seen as essential for managing deep societal disagreements and achieving bipartisan solutions.
  • Recognizing Mutual Dignity: Civility requires recognizing the dignity of opponents, which helps reduce hostility and fosters a more collaborative political environment.
  • Promoting Respectful Dialogue: It provides a framework for addressing conflicts, particularly in diverse environments, by encouraging active listening and reducing conflict-driven “drama”.

Some Democrats advocate for civility as a social norm primarily to protect the stability of democratic institutions and to rebuild public trust in a polarized political climate. By promoting respectful discourse, these supporters aim to move away from personal attacks and toward a governing culture that can effectively address societal issues through compromise and mutual understanding. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Core Reasons for Supporting Civility

  • Stability of Democracy: Proponents argue that democracy requires a baseline level of respect to function. Without civility, institutions suffer from increased hostility and a “declining faith in democracy”.
  • Enabling Compromise: Meaningful policy solutions often require reaching across the aisle. Supporters believe that treating opponents as “political equals” rather than enemies allows for the negotiation of “reasonable compromises”.
  • Restoring Public Trust: High levels of political vitriol can weaken trust in government. Modeling civility is seen as a way for leaders to signal ethics, honesty, and a commitment to “good governance”.
  • Social Harmony and Diversity: In a diverse society, civility is viewed as a “moral glue” that prevents different viewpoints from devolving into aggression. It encourages “bridging capital”—trust between strangers—which makes both democratic governance and economic exchange easier.
  • Voter Preference: Many Democratic voters value institutional norms and professional behavior. Polls indicate a strong majority of voters believe respect is the first step toward a working government.

Summary

There is broad support in the US for Civility as a social norm. Grass-roots efforts to improve understanding, application and encouragement of Civility have good prospects for success.

The 8 Older Men and Civility

The blind men and the elephant: Is perception reality?

In recent times, eight older men lived in an Indiana community. Each was successfully retired and quite confident. Their neighbors loved the older men and encouraged their breakfast group meetings. Since the older men were no longer actively engaged at work, they had to imagine how things really operated. They listened carefully to stories about the active world of business, government, politics, health care, science, and leadership told to them by others.

The men were curious about many of the stories they heard, but they were most curious about Civility as a super solution to social challenges. They were told that Civility could fix politics, solve tough problems, promote personal growth, reinsert facts and logic into debate, revive trust, social relationships and institutions, and restore the balance between individuals and community. 

They remembered Indiana as a very special place with great leaders. They recognized Birch and Evan Bayh, VP’s Quayle and Pence, representatives Lee Hamilton and Julia Carson, Indianapolis mayors Hudnut, Goldsmith, Petersen, Ballard and Hogsett, mayor and senator Lugar, but especially Governor Mitch Daniels.  They knew that Daniels had been effective for Indiana, America and Purdue.  Did Daniels believe in this Civility miracle solution?

The older men argued day and night about Civility. “Civility must be too simple,” claimed the first man. He had heard stories that it ignores real differences and big solutions.

“No, you must be wrong,” argued the second man. “Civility is complicated, combining values and habits in search of perfection.  That is why people struggle to follow it.”

“You’re wrong! Civility seeks compromise, the middle ground and the golden mean.  It combines the best that participants can offer,” said the third man.

“Please,” said the fourth man. “You are all mistaken. Civility grandly guarantees that it can solve all problems and conflicts! You know how people exaggerate.”

“How can you be so naïve,” exclaimed the fifth man.  “Civility simply rationalizes weak, overly sensitive behaviors that avoid conflict and deny human nature.”

“Civility ignores passion and the emotions,” cried the sixth man.  “It eliminates feelings, values, and intuitions by emphasizing cold rationality alone.”

“I am sure that Civility is a leftist plot,” said the seventh man. “That would explain why it emphasizes the importance and legitimacy of government.”

“On the contrary,” declared the eighth man. “Civility is a Republican scheme to return to the 1950’s with its mindless emphasis on a single culture, morality, character and values.”

Finally, the neighbors grew tired of all the arguments, and arranged for the curious men to visit the home office of Mr. Daniels to learn the truth about Civility.

When the men reached the home a half-hour ahead of schedule, they were greeted by an old friend who managed the governor’s visitors. Their friend led them to a waiting room where they watched a 10-minute video on Civility. The retired men quickly began to argue.

The first man stood up and exclaimed. “Civility is just common sense, nothing special.”

The second man misquoted the video. “Civility claims that all people can get along and all problems can be solved,” he announced.

The third man disagreed. “I was right,” he decided. “Civility is a tool of the powerful to maintain the status quo.”

The fourth man criticized Civility’s idealism. “What we have here,” he said, “is a sort of cult, invoking magical practices to reach utopian ends.”

The fifth man responded, “Civility is hopelessly weak because it asserts that strong emotions, interpersonal relations, sensitivity and hospitality can mend all fences.”

The sixth man stated, “Civility is very powerful.  It allows groups and individuals to acquire and use power for their own ends, while dismissing the needs and desires of others.”

The seventh man considered the actors in the presentation. “Civility elevates individuals and personal growth above church and community, so it must favor Democrats,” he said.

The eighth man was shocked. “Why, Civility is nothing more than a way for the powerful to reassert social control through norms, taboos and shunning,” he scoffed.

The governor’s aide led his friends to the kitchen. “Sit here and rest,” he said. “I will bring you something to drink.”

While they waited, the eight men talked about Civility.

“Civility is just politeness, rules and etiquette.  It is a surface level approach,” said the first man. “Surely we can finally agree on that.”

“Just politeness? Civility aims to transform men, institutions and society” answered the second man.

“Transformation?  Civility focuses just on process, promotes elite values and prevents real arguments and solutions” insisted the third man.

“It’s impossible for everyone to develop such powerful skills that effectively bridge real human differences,” said the fourth man.

“Civility merely assumes that better skills, processes and values can manage differences, conflicts and human nature through the forces of goodwill,” noted the fifth man.

“Civility provides a socially approved way for individuals to emphasize form over substance.  They can perform in a civil manner without really addressing the needs of others,” cautioned the sixth man.

“Socialist subjectivity and radical tolerance. There’s no doubt,” said the seventh man.

“Don’t you see?” pleaded the eighth man. “Civility is intended to keep us occupied and distracted by small issues and away from the larger issues of systematic injustice.  Someone is using Civility to trick us.”

Their argument continued and their shouts grew louder and louder.

“Too simple!” “Too complex!” “Too moderate!” “Too extreme!” “Too soft!” “Too hard!” “Too liberal!” “Too conservative!”

“Stop shouting!” called a very angry voice.

It was Purdue President emeritus Daniels, disturbed by the noisy argument.

“How can each of you be so certain you are right?” asked the former governor.

The eight men considered the question. And then, knowing the budget director to be a very wise man, they decided to say nothing at all.

“Civility combines values, skills and behaviors to solve problems and build relations,” said Mr. Daniels. “Each of you exaggerates the importance of only one part. Perhaps if you put the parts together, you will see the truth. Now, let me finish my morning in peace.”

When their friend returned with drinks, the eight men rested quietly, thinking about their leader’s advice.

“He is right,” said the first man. “To learn the truth, we must put all the parts together. Let’s discuss this on the journey home.”

The first man found his seat on the senior bus. The second man found his seat, and so on until all eight men were ready to travel together.

References (and apologies …)

Peace Corps – The Blind Men and the Elephant

Civility is Nonpartisan – Good News

Civility is Not Simple or Easy – Good News

Opposition to Civility is Unconvincing – Good News

Opposition to Civility is Unconvincing (2) – Good News

Civility is for Everyone! – Good News

Civility: Can’t We All Just Get Along? – Good News

Civility Resources (1): Context of Good News

Optimism – Global Wellness Institute

Overview

Our current challenging social and political situation is driven by the root causes of individualism, skepticism secularism, inadequate myths, human nature and insecurity. In a word: negativity. Civility embraces constructiveness, intentionality and public-spiritedness as clearly “positive” values. It is also based upon the “positive” values of human dignity, respect and acceptance. Is it reasonable to be so positive in a time of negativity driven by politicians, the media and our fellow citizens? The answer is “yes”. We have chosen to emphasize our challenges rather than our accomplishments. Those who pursue Civility need to be aware of the reality of modern progress, conditions in all areas of life and realistic opportunities for change.

Overall Good News

Improvements in all areas of life since the 1976 bicentennial are amazing!

We’re MUCH Better Off in 2026 – Good News

100 improvements in all areas.

Index of 100 Good News Posts – Good News

A safer world.

Modern History: International – Good News

Unimaginable communications and computer tools.

Modern History: Communications and Computers – Good News

Social progress and social choices.

Modern History: Society and Religion – Good News

32 Fiction Works Set in the 1950’s – Good News

Philosophy and politics. We have succeeded many times.

Modern History: Philosophy and Politics – Good News

WW II, the Fifties and early Sixties: 24 Great Biographies – Good News

American Presidents – 36 Great Biographies – Good News

Science and Technology

Modern History: Communications and Computers – Good News

Human Progress: Accumulate and Innovate – Good News

Modern History: Math (and Physics) – Good News

Modern History: Biology and Life – Good News

Modern History: Technology – Good News

Good News: 100 Recent Technical Innovations for You! – Good News

Business and Economics

Modern History: Business & Economics – Good News

80 Years of Global Economic Success – Good News

The US Economy Leads the World – Good News

The US Economy is Already Great: No Tariffs Required – Good News

Good News: The Business Cycle is Done – Good News

Management Effectiveness Has More Than Doubled in the Last 50 Years!!!! – Good News

Mostly Good News Since the 2008 Great Recession – Good News

Civility Resources (6): Solutions

Overview

Civility is a popular subject to talk about and bemoaning the loss of Civility has become a national pastime. But the trick is to “do something about it”. We have personal, political, strategic, educational, policy and structural solutions to consider.

Politics

Once citizens see that they are treated like victims and encouraged to adopt a victim position by politicians, they can “turn the table” and demand to be treated as powerful voters given real answers.

Don’t Be a Political Victim (Left) – Good News

Don’t Be a Political Victim (Right) – Good News

Civilization and daily life are guided by unspoken norms and beliefs. We have experienced significant changes in the past century that undermined the consensus view and now requires individuals to consciously consider a greater share of their daily lives. We have not reached a new consensus and may not do so anytime soon. As we work through these differences we need to reinvest in Civility skills, habits and understanding. Civility helps us individually, in groups and as a society to interact effectively despite our differences. We don’t need perfection or infinite improvement, but we need to invest in Civility and use its power as a self-reinforcing system or virtuous cycle to guide us into the future.

The Power of Civility – Good News

In order to solve our political problems, we need to face and solve the 6 underlying root causes. They are interconnected. They can be addressed mostly outside of the political process. This is cause for great hope and optimism.

Facing Our Political Situation: How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria? – Good News

Education

We live in a complex, interdependent world and must make many choices.  We need a greatly enhanced educational program.

Modern Curriculum for Citizens – Good News

Policies

Many Americans today cry out for “respect”. They see a social, economic and political system that does not work for them. A political party that really understands this situation would take strong action, IMHO. Some thoughts …

R-E-S-P-E-C-T – Good News

I’ve outlined other policy steps below that might convince the two-thirds of the electorate that are working and middle class that they are the priority.

R-E-S-P-E-C-T-2 – Good News

This 2017 bestseller was applauded by the WSJ, The Economist, Harvard sociologist Robert Putnam, JD Vance (as a complement to Hillbilly Elegy) and Barrack Obama. It tells the story of Janesville, Wisconsin as a General Motors assembly plant with 3,000 workers was permanently closed in the turmoil of the Great Recession. It focuses on the impact on real people and the community’s response. The author concludes that neither the liberal response of job training nor the conservative response of economic redevelopment incentives was adequate to meet the community’s needs. What could work?

The Janesville Plan: Economic Opportunity for All – Good News

Wealthy individuals and families have great wealth to protect. As a nation and society, we have an obligation to eliminate this concern from being a primary role in our political decisions. We can set reasonable limits on the maximum contributions required from prosperous individuals in our society. 

The Paradox of Great Wealth in a Democracy – Good News

Structures

Draft citizen and candidate Civility pledges to consider.

A Civility Pledge – Good News

Civility Pledges – Good News

The people and leaders can choose to create new structures that provide pressure on politicians to act with Civility.

Taking Back Our Government: Candidate Appraisal Boards (CAB) – Good News

Promoting the General Good: A Council of Advisors, Elders, Guardians or Wisdom – Good News

Voters don’t have to accept non-Civil candidates.

We Always Have a Choice – Good News

Talk with others.

The 8 Older Men and Civility – Good News

Opposition to Civility is Unconvincing (2)

Mirror Images of Extremism

I reviewed and dismissed the “far left” challenges to the Civility movement today. The populist Republican opposition is similarly “surface level”.

Google AI Summary of Republican Party Opposition to Civility

Based on the provided search results, opposition from some members or factions of the Republican Party toward certain “civility movements” often stems from the view that such movements are used to silence legitimate political opposition, stifle aggressive accountability, or protect a “woke agenda”. The Conversation

The arguments and perspectives from the search results suggest several reasons for this opposition:

View of Civility as Political Suppression: Some conservatives argue that calls for “civility” are a tool used by the left to de-legitimize passionate, tough, and direct opposition to their policies.

“Us-Versus-Them” Mentality: There is a belief among some, reflected in remarks by leaders like Mike Pence, that political rivals are not just wrong, but actively advancing an immoral or dangerous agenda, making compromise or polite discourse feel counterproductive to them.

Belief in Confrontational Politics: Many, particularly in the populist wing of the party, believe in aggressive, combative tactics that grab attention and stir up the base, rather than polite, quiet debate.

Perception of Double Standards: Some conservatives feel that the mainstream media and cultural institutions enforce a double standard, demanding civility from the right while overlooking harsh rhetoric or actions from the left.

Focus on Radical Change: Some Republicans view the current political climate as existential, where they are fighting to protect traditional values against rapid, fundamental societal changes, making “polite disagreement” feel inadequate.

Distrust of Elite Narratives: There is a strong feeling that the “civility movement” is promoted by the same “educated elite” that they believe has rigged the system, and that this movement is a way to stop conservatives from challenging that system.

These factors suggest that opposition to the “civility movement” is often not an opposition to polite behavior itself, but a rejection of what they perceive as a strategic tool to weaken their political power and silence their opposition. 

https://theconversation.com/democratic-and-republican-voters-both-love-civility-but-the-bipartisan-appeal-is-partly-because-nobody-can-agree-on-what-civility-is-193061#:~:text=They%20value%20civility%2C%20but%20hold,important%20matters%20to%20get%20heated.

https://www.ohiosenate.gov/news/the-democratic-standard/what-do-republicans-really-want-civility-or-civil-war#:~:text=The%20most%20glaring%20omission%20from,not%20the%20fault%20of%20Democrats.

https://www.legion.org/information-center/news/magazine/2013/january/a-case-for-civility#:~:text=Lugar’s%20loss%20in%20the%202012,media%2C%20particularly%20on%20the%20Internet.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10396794/#:~:text=Abstract,political%20incivility%20than%20previously%20thought.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/06/28/heres-how-political-science-explains-the-gops-obsession-with-civility/

Response

  1. Civility promotes communications as the only means to recognize existing or potential common ground. Civility does not prefer moderate political positions or the “conventional wisdom” of a time or political party. Civility does not oppose radically different positions on political issues, only the expression of positions which demonize the opposite position or its supporters. Robust debate is an essential part of what was once quaintly called “civil discourse”. Republicans are mistakenly merging Civility with the alleged restriction of “free speech” by some universities, organizations and media outlets. Civility requires partisans to clearly express their values, interests and policies in order to identify potential shared interests and evaluate differences.
  2. Civility is based upon the values of human dignity, respect and constructiveness. Participants are encouraged to set aside political differences and respect their common interests and humanity. The effective techniques of Civility separate the person from the policy. The Civility movement accepts and embraces differences as natural and unavoidable. https://tomkapostasy.com/2025/03/02/our-political-differences-are-not-going-away-and-thats-ok/
  3. The Civility approach emphasizes rational conversation, interaction, evaluation and compromise. It does not discourage passionate expression of interests. It recognizes people as thinking, feeling and doing creatures. It argues that lasting resolution of policy disagreements requires better understanding and full participation of all interested parties. Short-term tactical victories are unlikely to be sustained without some “meeting of the minds”. This warning is especially relevant at the state and local level of politics and in daily life.
  4. There certainly are cultural and media institutions with left-wing or right-wing biases. They are often blinded by their biases and use all of the tools of modern communications and social media to slant their messages and unfairly consider their opponents. Civility attempts to hold them to account. It promotes self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship management. It is based upon the values of respect, responsibility and constructiveness. https://tomkapostasy.com/2026/01/25/the-7-civility-values-are-supported-by-world-religions/ https://tomkapostasy.com/2025/12/09/civility-is-really-about-7-behaviors/
  5. Civility is based upon the traditional values of human dignity, respect, acceptance, responsibility, constructiveness, intentionality and public-spiritedness. It is firmly grounded in the traditions of Western civilization and liberal democracy. Civility is not biased towards a far-left, postmodernist, secular society free of social norms and community. It recognizes the tension between the individual and the community, traditional and modern (WEIRD) and postmodern values but remains agnostic regarding the best solution other than the preservation of a communications and problem-solving framework. https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/7heEBq7oZnMvbSbJa/weird-morality#:~:text=purview%20of%20morality.-,Moral%20Foundations%20Theory,sanctity/degradation
  6. Civility is based upon 7 widely held values and 7 commonly taught behaviors. It does not prioritize any social, political, economic or educational elite. It outlines a set of specific behaviors that lead to effective communications and problem solving in all dimensions of life. Practitioners at any social level can benefit directly or indirectly. https://tomkapostasy.com/2025/10/25/civility-whats-in-it-for-me/ https://tomkapostasy.com/2025/11/30/inspiring-civility/

Summary

The populist wing of the Republican party sounds like the far-left wing of the Democratic party. Civility is a tool of the other guys, unfair, biased, inadequate, ineffective, unreliable, soft, emotional and too slow. The Civility approach doesn’t support the simple polarizing approach of modern politics. It emphasizes facts, logic, values clarification, optimal means, compromises, discovery, short and long run trade-offs, all of the tools of the modern negotiator’s kitbag. It accepts that profound differences may remain in our political, economic and social realms. It is fundamentally a “glass half-full” approach. Civility argues that its approach is much more effective in the long run in finding reasonable solutions, minimizing deep pain for those who disagree and maintaining relationships that promote future solutions.

Tom Kapostasy’s Home Plate: 500 Posts, A Dozen Categories

Civility, root causes of our problems, community, good news, the economy, Trump, history, religion, popular culture, Indiana, Hamilton County.

Scroll down to the bottom to subscribe.

https://tomkapostasy.com/

The Trump Economy: 2025

Overall, at the same core 2.5% growth rate seen for the last decade.

Labor productivity growth down a bit from the pandemic recovery bump.

Median wage growth remains at 2%, down a bit from pre-pandemic 2.5%.

Job growth is very weak. Typically, this indicates a coming recession, but the reduction of the immigration labor supply makes historical comparisons difficult.

Unemployment rate remains at historically low 4.5% but it has been increasing for more than 2 years.

The “underemployed” rate shows the same relative level and trend.

Labor force participation hit record levels after the pandemic and has remained there.

The personal savings rate is low, a bit below the pandemic and trending slightly downward.

Mortgage rates remain elevated, around 6.5%.

New home sales are pretty stable, at pre-pandemic level.

Housing prices jumped from $320,000 to $440,000 after the pandemic. They have fallen back by 5% in 4 years.

The US stock market continues to climb.

Corporate profits have roughly doubled since before the pandemic.

Manufacturing employment continues to decline.

Exports are up 50% and still growing slowly.

Imports also increased by 50%.

Businesses continue to invest.

Business confidence remains weak.

Businesses have maintained their target inventory to sales ratios.

Consumer confidence is down and weak.

Federal debt % of GDP remains at 120%, up from 105%.

Value of the US dollar increased by 10-12% after the pandemic, but has retreated by 6%.

The Federal Reserve Board has reduced interest rates by 1.5%.

Core inflation rate has levelled off near 3%.

The GDP Price deflator measure of inflation is a little better, approaching 2.5%, but also level or growing.

Misery index is up a bit at 7.5%.

Summary

Stock market is solidly up together with corporate profits and business investment.

Inflation and unemployment are up. Budget deficits and debt remain high. Dollar value is down. Manufacturing employment is down. Business and consumer confidence is down.

Other measures are comparable to the 2023-2024 Biden economy base; not improving as often claimed.

The US economy is increasingly resilient and not easily changed by small policy choices or “jawboning”.

Addressing the “Threat” of Immigration

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ties-mexico-tariff-threats-to-hefty-immigration-demands-11559332126

Immigration has become a strong winning issue for right-wing parties around the world and an organizing issue for extreme right-wing parties. Why? What should centrist and left-wing parties do?

Accelerants

There are more immigrants. Economic, religious, social and political immigrants. More international conflicts, civil wars and gang violence. Continued huge gaps in living standards between countries. Global communications and transportation networks that make migration possible. The demand for in-migration to developed countries is very high.

In a world of rapid change, slowing growth and religious doubt, citizens of advanced nations are insecure.

Politicians have learned that a simplistic polarization of left versus right is much easier to manage than “solving problems” and have increasingly framed all politics as “us versus them”.

In a world of skepticism and loss of certainty caused by the undermining of religion, progress, science, socialism, fascism, or nationalism as a definite answer we increasingly turn to “identity” as our rock. Blame Rene Descartes’ “I think, therefore I am” insight or Martin Luther’s religious individualism or libertarian economic individualism or countercultural social individualism or the “therapeutic society” triggered by Sigmund Freud.

We all need a basis for our cognitive consistency. Today, our personal identity is raised as a mini-God of great importance. We merge political, cultural and personal identities. We look to national, cultural, racial, class, professional, fraternal, social, alumni or corporate identities for meaning. Identity is MUCH more important today. It is subject to political and media influence and manipulation.

Moral Foundations Framework

Jonathan Haidt and his colleagues sought to define the core, inherent, inherited moral, political and religious frameworks that we all have. They contrasted traditional and modern moral beliefs. They noted that “modern” beliefs are extraordinary and WEIRD: Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic. They combined social science testing, statistics and evolutionary psychology to determine 5-8 widely held moral beliefs that “make sense” based on their interpretation of human and cultural evolution. They noted that liberals emphasize just the two values of care and fairness, while conservatives add the values of loyalty, authority, purity/sanctity, proportionality, ownership and liberty.

Immigration is a Huge Threat to Many

I’m insecure, framing politics in simple left versus right, “us versus them” terms and insecure in my identity. I’m sensitive to all of the moral flavors, including loyalty, authority and purity. Immigration is increasing. Illegal immigration is uncontrolled.

What do I see?

Economic threats to jobs, assets and privilege.

Unfair claims on public welfare programs.

Risk of increased crime, disease, drugs and social dysfunction.

Further dilution of and threats against traditional culture by unfamiliar “others”. Different birthplace, nationality, race, religion, class, language and expectations.

Opposition to the “rule of law”, unfairly proposing amnesty for illegal immigrants.

A feeling of personal and social violation or invasion by “others”. A loss of control.

A threat to the symbolic nation and national security.

Reasonable people take this perspective. They look at “liberals” who emphasize “immigrant rights” above this reality as insane.

Academic research generally supports the “Moral Foundations Theory” view.

https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1864-9335/a000447

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176724001251

https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/7/3/65

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506231162161

Centrist Political Response

  1. Acknowledge those who feel this threat. Don’t dismiss, discount, demonize or rationalize them or the politicians that support them. Recognize their legitimate concerns.
  2. Focus on the issue of illegal immigration. Solve it. Invest in border controls.
  3. Implement a national ID system that prevents illegal employment.
  4. Enhance the agricultural guest worker program.
  5. Focus on the issue of unlimited asylum seekers. Solve it. Revise standards to be reasonable. Resolve cases within a year. Set a limit. Find ways to “share the love” with other countries.
  6. Support a “points system” that prioritizes “value added” immigrants.
  7. Propose a way like Reagan’s “path to citizenship” for existing illegal immigrants.
  8. Support expulsion of all convicted felony criminals.
  9. Ignore the extremist rhetoric about illegal immigrants.
  10. Highlight Trump’s unwillingness to even discuss a bipartisan solution.
  1. Highlight the much greater importance of national economic success, affordable prices, the rule of law, sustainable democracy and American global interests.
  2. Highlight a political platform of personal and economic opportunity rather than individual “rights”.
  3. Promote immigrant success stories at the working, middle, professional and upper-class levels. Leverage visible sports, arts, media and political figures.
  4. Highlight diverse successful assimilation communities across the United States.
  5. Fine-tune welfare programs to clearly exclude illegal immigrants.

Summary

Leftists often believe that their views are obvious, logical and historically “true”. Caring and Fairness are clearly the ultimate values in modern times. The other values are seen as remnants of the unenlightened past. I believe that the moral values of loyalty, authority and purity are also valid. Principled conservatism is a valid perspective.

It is easy to take an enlightened, universal, abstract, economically disinterested view when someone has the assets and talents valued by our society (standing “privilege” on its head). When an individual is unsure of his prospects (standing John Rawls on his head) in the real world, he is rooted in the familiar world of family, caste, class, neighborhood, culture, social groups and self-interest. Insecurity and threats matter. Politicians in a democratic system should listen and respond.

Immigration is a real threat to a majority of our citizens. We should manage it accordingly.

Only by managing the threat can we invest in the proper care for immigrants as a society.

I addressed this topic 4 years ago. I was less willing to fully accept the right-wing perspective.

The Decadent Society: Too Dark

New York Times columnist Ross Douthat says he began crafting this 2020/2021 book in 2014. He argues that we are stuck in a stagnant society that has lost its ability to reach for the future. Technological, space, business, economics, politics, ideologies, and cultural achievements in the arts, film and music have lost their dynamism. We are pictured as a weak shadow of 1945, 1965 or 1975.

He argues that stagnation eventually leads to decline or disaster. His preferred future contains “growth, innovation, aesthetic reinvention and religious ferment”. Any solution must contain “zeal, coherence, mysticism and futurism”. He outlines several possible paths to decline and further stagnation.

He also describes some potential routes to a renaissance. Modified Islam. African Christianity. Expanded Chinese influence. Massive African migration and impact on Europe. Illiberal democracies like Russia gain favor. Populism governs pragmatically. Local communities flourish in the communitarian model promoted by Patrick Deneen. Nationalism recovers its power. A revised global socialism. Pure scientism. Updated paganism or polytheism. A paradigm shift that makes religion a real option for educated elites, displacing the “materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature”. A religious “great awakening” or new delivery mechanism. A merger of scientific and religious sensibilities that recognize our unique position as self-aware humans on planet earth.

Our columnist and critic evaluates the modern world much too negatively in my view. Despite challenges, the US and global economy is doing very well. It overcame the Great Recession and the Covid Pandemic. It is adjusting to Trump’s “tariff wars”. Growth is solid, trade is growing, employment is up. The business cycle is effectively managed. Productivity growth continues. These economies are resilient, reflected in stock market values. There are greater inequality and rent-seeking, which can be addressed politically.

Europe and other US allies are adjusting to Trump’s “America first” approach. They are adjusting to Russia’s threats and invasion of Ukraine.

Science progresses. Covid solutions. Weight control. Driverless cars. Smart phone capabilities. Artificial intelligence. Robotics. Modern satellite communications. Medicines. Fracking. Nanotechnologies. Green power. Electric cars. Blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

The ongoing integration of race, class, region and immigrants in the US continues. It’s not perfect but a solid majority embraces the multicultural US. Young Americans only know this positive world.

Many critics agree with Mr. Douthat that the arts and culture have stagnated. I’m not sure that marks “the end of civilization”. Today I have quick access to everything that has been offered for 100 years. We are culturally blessed.

https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/why-has-american-pop-culture-stagnated

https://www.honest-broker.com/p/are-we-living-in-a-time-of-cultural

The author invests several pages in analyzing Francis Fukuyama’s 1992 “end of history” claim. He agrees that the Western liberal democracies have fended off the BIG challenges of fascism and communism but notes that new and old critics have returned. He gives Fukuyama a fair treatment and notes his more recent focus on the role of “identity” in shaping political views.

Unfortunately, Mr. Douthat is not interested in refining “liberal democracy” as a solution to our alleged stagnation. He is critical of managerialism, technocracy and modern meritocracy. He sees it as inherently self-interested and narrow. I think that we have no choice but to invest in improving our historical “liberal democracy” framework.

I think the gap between science and the humanities remains even wider than it was in 1959 when CP Snow called out his educated colleagues. We need a way to connect science and religion, politics and people. The “structural” advantages of strong political, social and economic systems are not inherently opposed to human values. We should invest in closing this gap in our universities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two_Cultures

My followers know that I have become a “true believer” in the potential of “civility” to become formally defined and promoted as a shared cultural norm to support our political, social and economic institutions.

Solutions

I wholeheartedly agree with his two real religious solutions. The default paradigm today is “science versus religion” and “science alone is real”. There is significant scientific and philosophical evidence to overturn this current worldview.

Many of our current challenges exist because we have not revised our laws and political structures to adapt to modern wealth, amoral political actors and media capabilities.

We could choose to invest in economic and breakthrough scientific progress by making political choices.

We could choose to support the modern “therapeutic society” approach of encouraging every child to “live a great life today” in pursuit of their self-actualizing possibilities.

We could invest in improving the productivity of our lagging economic sectors: government, education, health care and not for profits.

We could revise our goals to emphasize quality as equal to quantity.

We could invest in promoting communities of all kinds, not just those local, total communities suggested by Patrick Deneen.

We could do a better job of outlining. defining and communicating to everyone our 5-part political spectrum of left, center-left, independent, center-right and right. Individuals rarely change. We are stuck with each other. How do we effectively structure our political, social and economic systems to accommodate these different views?

Summary

Douthat argues that we have stagnated on all dimensions. We need to find a way forward. I agree with 2 of his options and offer a few more possibilities.