
Introduction
I was born in northeast Ohio in 1956, left for Dallas from 1984-87, returned and then moved to Indianapolis in 1988. I pulled the data on median family incomes to try to explain the impact of the shutdown of factories between 1960 and 1990 on the Ohio economy at the county level.
88 Ohio Counties








Context and Analysis
I was born in “the best location in the nation” according to the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI). Cleveland was the source of the oil-based energy revolution and home of John D. Rockefeller. It was a major steel-making hub ideally situated to combine coal, iron ore and limestone. It had translated this advantage into providing metal machining services for all industries. The Cleveland metro area had been in the top 10 by population nationally and home to great sports teams. It was an innovator in paints, chemicals, electricity, science and broadcasting. It was home to a Federal Reserve Bank, a “Big 8” accounting firm and many Fortune 500 headquarters. It was a distribution hub within 500 miles of a large share of the US population and GDP. Its cultural assets were world class. It was situated on the Lake Shore rail line between New York City and Chicago. It was served by many interstate highways, 2 airports, the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway. It leaned Republican but had strong Democratic cities. It was a powerful state, deemed the “mother of presidents” with 8 serving the nation. I attended McKinley ES and Harding HS. Cleveland leaned towards New England culturally as descendants of the Connecticut New Western Reserve for Revolutionary War soldiers.
Cleveland’s manufacturing prowess was repurposed during WWII to support the “arsenal of democracy”. It expanded in the post-war boom period to support the US and European recoveries. Unfortunately, Cleveland firms, owners and banks generally missed the transition to value added services and modern manufacturing between 1960 and 1990. The same story played out throughout the Midwest. The very best manufacturing firms improved their processes, developed new products and outsourced routine production in order to survive.
Ohio incomes were 10% above the national average in 1959 but below the average by 1989. The state was loaded with 18 large manufacturing counties that provided world class output and incomes above the 90th percentile for the 3,100 American counties. Cleveland, Akron/Canton/Youngstown, Columbus and Cincinnati/Dayton were global manufacturing leaders in 1959.
Real incomes grew by 59% between 1959 and 1989 for the nation as a whole. Ohio incomes grew by just 42% as the manufacturing economy faced global competition. The 18 major manufacturing counties grew by the same $11,000 as the state, 10% less than the national $13,000. These proud counties fell from the 95th to the 86th percentile of incomes in these 3 decades.
Ohio had some offsetting growth during this period. 14 northwestern counties were able to leverage their globally competitive agricultural assets to boost incomes by 70%, raising their percentile level from 74% to 81%. 6 very low-income southern counties experienced 74% income growth as they maintained their 40th percentile income level. 8 suburban counties booked 76% income growth, moving from 83rd to 91st percentile incomes.
The remaining 42 countries celebrated $9,000 worth of improved income compared with the national average of $13,000. They declined from the 72nd to the 56th income percentile.
Overall, proud Ohio could only claim 23 income percentile gains amongst its 88 counties across these 3 decades (1/4th). 15 in the rich Maumee River valley farmlands and 6 in suburban counties.
Summary
Ohio did not keep up with the global competition from 1959 to 1989. It managed to retain a disproportionate 25 Fortune 500 firms and their benefits to the local economy. Schumpeter’s theory of competitive destruction applies here. Prior success is a possible base for future success (industry and talent clusters) but not a guarantee. Ohio has experienced falling real incomes in both its metro and rural counties in the subsequent decades leading to a populist political environment.













































