Trump is Not Mr. Affordable

I wrote many posts during the Biden administration to counteract the recurring false claims about “runaway inflation”. Biden was certainly guilty of spending too much taxpayers’ money for economic recovery, infrastructure, green projects and student loan forgiveness. This aggravated the inflation rate, made it slower to fall and established expectations of higher long-term inflation. However, the primary drivers of inflation were the pandemic driven demand for physical goods after factories closed, loose monetary policy and bipartisan government spending to offset the pandemic. We all enjoyed 20 years of price stability before this. A little bumpiness after a pandemic driven global shutdown was not surprising.

Current Inflation Rate

The climbing inflation rate broke in June, 2022 more than 3 years ago. It has not slowed under Trump’s stewardship.

The inflation rate has been in the 3% +/- range for the last 2 years. That means that prices, on average, continue to increase each year. 2% inflation was the normal rate for the prior 20 years. It (3%) seems to be a rate that is “non-accelerating”. Economic agents, including consumers, are able to ignore 2% inflation. It is immaterial, too small to really notice. 3% inflation is on the border of being “concerning”. Inflation can more easily accelerate from 3% to a concerning 5% or higher. President Trump can claim that he has maintained the Biden inflation reduction from 9% to 3% but he cannot claim that he has reduced prices, reduced inflation or made the cost of living more affordable.

The core inflation rate, excluding the more volatile food and energy prices, has shown the same pattern. It peaked at 6.5% and declined to “about 3%” by June, 2024. It has moved down by one-quarter percent since then. Unfortunately, it seems to be flat. Trump has not moved it down.

Smaller Policy Options

President Trump has pursued 2 of these 12 areas but worked in the opposite way to increase inflation on most. He has pressured drug prices down. He has encouraged increased supply of traditional fossil fuels energy.

Fiscal Policy

Federal budget deficit remains at an unsustainable $1.7T per year. Too much demand, not enough supply.

Monetary Policy

President Trump has been harassing Fed Chair Jerome Powell (who he appointed) to cut interest rates. The real, inflation adjusted, interest rate is currently 1%. Monetary policy is neutral or a little tight. President Trump encourages looser monetary policy which increases inflation. Not an inflation fighter.

US Dollar

The US dollar has declined in value since Trump took office, making foreign purchases more expensive.

Housing Costs

Housing prices peaked in 2022, drifted down by 5% in 2022 and have remained flat for the last two and a half years. Trump policies have no impact here.

Health Care

3% medical inflation continues despite efforts to reduce drug prices.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/11/business/prescription-drug-prices-trump

Food

Food prices are more volatile than most. Inflation reached 11% in 2022. It approached 2% in 2024 but has since increased to 3% annually.

Energy

Energy prices jumped in the first 2 years of recovery from the pandemic. They have been flat since then. Trump has cancelled $8B worth of previously authorized energy projects.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/white-house-cancels-nearly-8b-in-clean-energy-projects-in-blue-states

Gas prices averaged $2.50/gallon before the pandemic, spiked up to $4.50/gallon during the recovery and settled back to $3.00/gallon for the last 3 years.

Tariffs

US consumers enjoyed immaterial average import tariff rates for the last 50 years. Trump has levied an 18% tax on imports, increasing costs for American consumers of the 14% of their consumption that is imported. The inflationary impact of the Trump tariffs has not yet been passed along to consumers. The frequent changes in tariff rates have led businesses to absorb costs in the short run. This will not continue.

Tax Collections

https://www.nysscpa.org/news/publications/the-trusted-professional/article/irs-budget-to-decrease-37-in-2026-from-2025-proposes-a-decrease-in-employees-061125#:~:text=The%20last%20time%20the%20number,filing%20season%2C%20the%20Treasury%20stated.

Trump invests fewer resources in collecting taxes, reducing budget deficits and reducing inflation.

Labor Unions as a Force to Increase Wages

https://www.epi.org/blog/trump-is-the-biggest-union-buster-in-u-s-history-more-than-1-million-federal-workers-collective-bargaining-rights-are-at-risk/

No support from Trump for increased labor union power.

Improve Government Efficiency

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Government_Efficiency

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-firings-watchdogs-inspectors-general-60-minutes/

Marginal results from the highly publicized DOGE efforts, despite very large opportunities for improvement.

Government Shutdown Waste

A $10 billion-dollar permanent loss of output.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/oct/31/federal-shutdown-cost-economy-trump/

No Tax on Tips

This recent tax change benefits individuals with enough income to pay federal income taxes, so improves affordability for an estimated 4 million people.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/how-does-no-tax-on-tips-work-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/

No Tax on Overtime [Premium Pay]

This recent tax change exempts the overtime premium from federal taxation, so promotes affordability for hourly wage earners.

Extra Senior Federal Tax Deduction

This provision of OBBA benefits low to moderate income households aged 65 and older. Many experts criticize its structure, but it clearly makes life more affordable for those who benefit from the change.

.https://taxfoundation.org/blog/obbba-senior-deduction-tax-relief/

Higher Limit for State and Local Tax (SALT) Deductions

Higher income taxpayers who itemize deductions received a significant federal tax reduction. This change does not benefit most low to moderate income households.

https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/SALT-deduction-increase

Increased Cost and Reduced Availability of Child Care

The OBBBA increased tax credits to partially offset childcare costs. Critics considered these changes to be inadequate, noting that a “pro-family” political party should do better.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/10/25/5-facts-about-child-care-costs-in-the-us/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/07/12/trump-child-care-tax-credit-changes-details/84505810007/

https://tcf.org/content/commentary/the-top-five-trump-attacks-exacerbating-the-child-care-crisis/

Real Dollar Hourly Compensation

Real, inflation adjusted, compensation is slowly recovering towards its pre-pandemic level.

Tight Immigration Policies

Greatly reduced net immigration will tighten the labor supply in some industries, leading to higher compensation for some workers and higher prices for consumers. Economists have not reached a consensus on the net impact to the typical American.

Fires Bureau of Labor Statistics Chief

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-firings-watchdogs-inspectors-general-60-minutes/

Summary

Inflation continues at 3% annually. Real wages are keeping up with inflation. The memory of large price increases in 2022 that were never reversed seems to have reset inflation expectations from 1-2% to 3-4% per year. Some tax law changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill meaningfully cut taxes. Fiscal policy remains very loose and drives inflation. Monetary policy is considered neutral by most economists, but Trump is trying to loosen it, which risks further inflation. Trump’s “on/off” tariff negotiations have not yet driven large consumer price increases but have slowed business investments. Trump’s claims to have improved “affordability” rest on his specific actions that point in that direction, not on the economy wide statistics or large-scale policies that might significantly improve affordability for the “average” family.

The Trade War is Just Another Distraction

The “orange one” does not “hold all of the cards”. He is critically threatened by his foreign handlers and the US justice system. He was not elected to promote a trade war. No one expected a trade war. He merely “shadow boxed” during his first term on trade. He has made the “trade war” his first priority because it is a “sure win” politically, in the short-run. He first bluffed exaggerated 50% and 100% tariffs, and the media duly reported these crazy claims that anchor or outline the story. He now claims HUGE victories with 15% tariffs. The self-described GOAT negotiator thereby proves his standing. He claims victory. He uses this temporary bump in support to take over the government.

Citizens need to recognize that this is clearly not a “win” for the country. Import tariffs are simply taxes. They get split between the foreign exporter, the importer and the retail customer. At 15%, the typical payment split is 25%, 25% and 50%. Exporters still want to sell goods and maintain market share. They have fixed costs. They have profits. They can reduce prices in the short-term. Importers still want to sell goods and maintain market share. They can limit price increases in the short-term. Most markets are “sticky”. Brands, supply chains, habits, marketing and convenience matter. Import costs are half to three-quarters of retail prices. The consumer price increase is 5-8%. Some consumers switch to lower priced options, some don’t. The “next best” low price option for an imported good is probably another imported good. The “Trump tariffs” distort markets. They don’t deliver a “victory” for American consumers, producers, labor, finance or government. They merely “gum up the works”.

The “orange one” understands leverage, populism and persuasion. He really doesn’t understand markets, as demonstrated by his dozens of business failures. A 15% import tariff will cause pain for foreign exporters, US importers and consumers. It’s not large enough to cause a domestic firm to invest in expanded capacity. They will use all of their existing capacity and even cut prices a little to win market share. Manufacturing investments require 20-30-40 year timeframes to be viable. They require confidence in government policies on trade, regulations, antitrust, labor, environment, intellectual property, lobbying, property taxes, inventory taxes, corporate income taxes, international taxes, international finance, transportation, supply chains, labor costs, etc. Trump’s policies strongly work against such investments.

US industries don’t import goods to save just 10%. They import goods because the total cost of imports is at least 20% lower and trending in the right direction. Importing always has extra costs for transportation, communications, delays, coordination, property risks, quality control, product development, supplier management, flexibility, tariff risks on both ends, legal risks, capital controls, financial transactions, inventory, obsolescence, etc. There is a “step function” involved here. US firms from 1970-2000 only relinquished their domestic manufacturing because when they completely ignored all fixed costs and only looked at short-term variable costs, they had to outsource production. There will be no overall manufacturing renaissance. There will be some very low labor cost manufacturing that returns to the states. That is, only where labor costs are a small percentage of the total production cost. Hence the “job creation” impact will be tiny, impossible to measure.

So … if they won’t build new factories, what will be the leading responses of domestic importers? They will find ways to import/reroute goods from lowest tariff countries. They will find ways to reclassify goods and avoid tariffs. They will lobby for exemptions. They will import only key components and do “final assembly” locally in highly automated factories. They will hold imported goods in a Free Trade Zone. They will split physical products from services and intellectual property to minimize tariffs. They will lobby for domestic government subsidies. They will offer “service hour models” to customers as in aircraft engines and never sell the physical goods and incur the tariffs.

Will the import tariffs reduce the federal budget deficit? Yes. The US imports 15% of GDP. Tariffs will be applied to about half of the imports. Imports will be reduced and replaced by domestic production, a little. 15% of 5% is about 0.75% of GDP. The federal budget deficit is 6.5% and climbing. This will help a little. Consumers will pay for half of this as in a sales tax.

What are the secondary impacts of the tariffs? Domestic firms will invest management time and money in managing the system instead of developing better goods and services. Lower import competition often leads to higher prices overall. Domestic producers experience higher input costs and attempt to pass them along to consumers. Foreign countries will increase their tariff and non-tariff barriers to US exporters. The US loses its moral advantage as a promoter of “free trade”. The US loses opportunities to reduce trade barriers through global and regional “free trade” agreements. The US loses the opportunity to drive global labor and environmental standards. The US loses the opportunity to expand free trade in services, the industries of the future. The US’s “unfair advantage” as the manager of the US dollar as the global currency will be challenged. The US’s soft power in language, arts, education, language, culture, and global leadership will be questioned. The US’s role as a stalwart ally will be undermined, leading to merely costlier and unreliable transactional relations with former allies. Foreign citizens will choose to not consume US goods and services. The US will have to pay directly for its global military bases. The US will have to pay for allies’ support on the “war on terror”. The US will have to pay for all global initiatives. The US will have to directly control “rogue states”. The indirect costs are HUGE and unappreciated.

Why did the US pursue the post WW II new world order? Ending imperialism and colonies. Forming the United Nations and trying to use it to manage some conflicts. Principles of political self-determination and human rights. Global bodies for better health. Investments in Germany, Italy, Japan and Europe instead of reparations. International Monetary Foundation and World Bank to support developing nations and manage currencies. GATT and WTO to promote lower trade barriers and multilateral deals. NATO and other alliances rather than colonies and protectorates. The win/lose approach of the 1800’s, WWI and WWII had failed. The world was ready to try a win/win approach. The US, with its history of isolationism, exceptionalism and national independence, chose to not pursue “world dominance”. The post- WWII institutions were not perfect, but they demonstrated that they were much better than those that had governed international relations for the prior 500 years.

Again, put everything in perspective. The US imports 15% of GDP. 15% import tariffs on half of goods. Consumers adjust and substitute domestic and lower total price imports. US consumers pay a 1% sales tax on imported goods. US military and influence costs rise by much more than 1% of GDP. Consumers pay higher prices. The US has less global influence. Where is the win? Marginal manufacturing plants and jobs are not returning to the US, no matter what the “orange one” says unless they are subsidized by the local, state or national government.

This is just another “con” by the “orange one”. We want to believe that American jobs have been unfairly stolen by government subsidized factories and low-cost labor without environmental protections in foreign countries. There is a grain of truth in each claim. Foreign governments do subsidize export firms. They try to maintain low currency values to support exports. They accept low total labor costs and environmental damages. Every country tries to be globally competitive.

No “magic wand” exists to force or entice everyone into embracing win/win institutions or deals naively. There is always an incentive to be a “free rider”, taking advantage of the global deals and quietly not really complying, just like some oil producers in OPEC. There is always an advantage for a single country with enough power to “hold out” or bluff or play “chicken” to extract a better deal for that country than for the others. This is the real world of bargaining, negotiations and deal-making. No system, philosophy, institutions, social pressure, or trump card easily delivers win/win results without overcoming the win/lose incentives of the game’s players.

There was a time when “Republicans” were supposedly the party of realism, pragmatism, common sense, business, efficiency, logic, finance, trade, capitalism, science, industry, proof, objectivity, best practices, and elite opinion. “Democrats” allegedly appealed to emotions, wishes, utopias, fairness, justice, perspectives, hopes, possibilities, oppression, victimhood, persuasion, popular opinion, populism, and ideals. The post-WWII institutions were supported on a bipartisan basis for more than 50 years. In 1992, President Clinton and the Democratic party embraced the “third way”, fully supporting these policies, capitalism and limited government, despite criticisms from the progressive, new, far left. The post – WWII system of international institutions has been criticized as “globalism” and “neo-liberalism” by the left wing of the Democratic party.

The post-WWII institutions were not perfect for Democrats, Republicans, the USA or the global community. But they worked incredibly well. Real global GDP has increased by 40 times since 1945, from $2.5 trillion to $100 trillion!!!!! That is 4.72% real growth compounded year after year after year for 80 years, coming out of a world war, encompassing a cold war, the Vietnam War, the Korean War, a global pandemic, the collapse of birth rates, business cycles, financial panics, energy crises, Middle East wars, and terrorism.

The US real GDP increased by more than 11X in the same period, growing by 3.1% annually.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1

A comparable 80-year period before the Great Depression shows just 4-fold global real GDP growth, not 40-fold. Of course, much of this difference is due to differences other than the post-WWII institutions. This was a time of 1.75% annual growth rather than the modern 4.72%. The 3% annual difference compounded across 80 years delivers 10 times greater growth. This is not a marginal advantage. This is an UNBELIEVABLE advantage. This is difficult to communicate. Small percentage differences across a lifetime.

Summary

The “bottom line” is that the “orange one” only believes in “win/lose” and rejects any form of “win/win”. The post-WWII institutions are win/win, so they must be rejected. Capitalism, alliances, partnerships, joint ventures, corporations, modern supplier relations, families, communities, nations, treaties, fraternities, sororities, ecosystems, clubs, cooperatives, unions, study partners, mentors/mentees, credit unions, mutual insurance companies, social enterprises, not-for-profits, churches, service organizations and many others are win/win. The “win/lose” framework supports the “orange one’s” desired position as a great leader needed to save the people.

Free trade has provided truly amazing benefits for the US and the world. The post-WWII cooperative institutions have reduced wars and conflicts. The “Trump tariffs” will slow global economic growth. They will not provide any material benefits for the US.

The US has enough economic, social, political and military power to force country by country “deals” that appear to benefit the US, when considered in a short-term win/lose framework. These deals will harm the US and the global economy.

From 1945-2000 “free trade” was Republican economic orthodoxy. “Free trade” benefitted US multi-national corporations which had the ability to take advantage of global markets. The US economy and labor markets were flexible enough to manage the changes. Capitalism was supported as the best economic system versus communism, fascism, socialism, protectionism, imperialism, colonialism or mercantilism. US financial institutions were well positioned to facilitate trade. US universities were ready to educate the world. Imported goods and immigrant labor drove lower US wages.

Trump is appealing to his populist base to oppose the “others” of immigrants, non-whites, non-fundamentalist Christians, criminals, thieves, rapists, sweat shops, subsidized factories, polluters, underpaid workers, etc. “We should produce everything we need in America. We have the factory capacity, finances and skills to do so.” He appeals to nationalism while ignoring the critical principle of comparative advantage. Countries export only what they are very best at growing, producing or serving. They do not produce everything themselves just like states, firms and individuals that are not fully self-sufficient.

Modern History Index

257 items pulled from all arenas of life. Technology dominates, especially in the last century.

Grouping events into 40-year blocks shows 1940-79 as twice as dynamic as other eras.

1450 – 1779 20

1780 – 1819 12

1820 – 1859 16

1860 – 1899 31

1900 – 1939 47

1940 – 1979 99

1980 – 2025 32

Modern History: Business & Economics

1602 – Dutch East India Company, limited liability corporation, global trade

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_East_India_Company

1776 – The Wealth of Nations from markets, specialization and trade

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

1817 – Comparative advantage drives international trade

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ricardo

1865 – Gilded age economic expansion and inequality in the US, laissez faire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilded_Age

1867 – Trade unions legalized in the United Kingdom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_unions_in_the_United_Kingdom

1910 – Scientific management, Frederick Taylor, Taylor method

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_management

1911 – Breakup of the Standard Oil Company – anti-monopoly power

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil_Company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_History_of_the_Standard_Oil_Company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil_Co._of_New_Jersey_v._United_States

1913 – Federal Reserve Bank created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act

1913 – Industrial assembly line- Ford

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_line

1929 – Great Depression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_cycle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression

1933 – Securities and Exchange Commission regulates financial markets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securities_Act_of_1933

1936 – Modern macroeconomics is outlined

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes

1939 – Silicon Valley begins with Hewlett-Packard, product and financing innovation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Valley

1942 – Creative Destruction is an essential part of effective capitalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Schumpeter

1947 – Military industrial sector, defense complex created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_World_War_II

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States

1948 – Japanese companies start modern manufacturing based upon statistical insights.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Production_System

1950 – The study of “sequence of events” leads to modern project management.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_project_management

1952 – Henry Markowitz formalizes modern portfolio theory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_portfolio_theory

1955 – Destination theme park travel begins – Walt Disney

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disneyland

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_Experiences

1955 – Enclosed Shopping Mall

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shopping_center

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shopping_mall

1956 – Intermodal shipping container and freight transport

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermodal_freight_transport

1958 – General purpose credit cards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_card

1958 – A meritocratic work environment was dominating, and critics objected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_of_the_Meritocracy

1962 – Product and process standardization, franchising take off

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_McDonald%27s

1962 – Discount retailing, big box stores, category killers arise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Walmart

1968 – For profit health care.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCA_Healthcare

1970 – Income inequality begins to grow again in the US

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States

1971 – Discount air travel, standardized routes and aircraft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Southwest_Airlines

1973 – How much is a financial option worth?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes_model

1973 – Reliable express delivery is founded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FedEx

1974 – Tax-advantaged individual retirement accounts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_retirement_account

1975 – Index funds and mutual funds simplify and lower transaction costs of investing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vanguard_Group

1978 – Executive stock options provide high levels of tax-advantaged compensation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_stock_option

1979 – Monetary policy can stop inflation, at a cost.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Volcker

1980 – Junk bonds provide financing for riskier companies and tools for investors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-yield_debt

1980 – Michael Porter clarifies the effective use of business strategy to compete in markets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competitive_advantage

1984 – Eli Goldratt offers a “theory of constraints” as a way to understand and manage complex systems effectively, leading to true “lean manufacturing” and “lean operations”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_constraints

1994 – On-line retailing, everything is in stock, and available soon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Amazon

2007 – Great Recession highlights the ongoing risks of financial deregulation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession

Summary

Process standardization. Financial innovation. Highly focused strategies. New business forms. Markets and international trade deliver desired products, lower prices and competition. A role for government regulation remains. The macroeconomy can be managed to reduce the impact of business cycles and shocks.

Good News: The Business Cycle is Done

https://www.yourobserver.com/news/2023/dec/01/construction-begins-legacy-trail-overpasses/

From 1945 through 1985 the US economy regularly accelerated its growth, reached a peak, fell back and then recovered. Businesses, economists, politicians and the public expected that this 3-5 year business cycle would continue forever.

Looking back, it seems like the business cycle was broken by 1985. All of the subsequent downturns have been prompted by extraneous, outside of the system, shocks. In 1990 a second global oil shortage shock.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_1990s_recession_in_the_United_States

In 2000-2001, a stock market bubble popped.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_2000s_recession#:~:text=A%20combination%20of%20the%20Dot,Inverted%20yields%20in%20early%202001.

In 2007, a mortgage lending bubble popped.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession

In 2020, a pandemic driven recession, followed by a very unexpected rapid recovery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_recession

40 years without a classic business cycle recession is long enough to claim victory.

How could this happen? The independent Federal Reserve Bank has maintained a neutral monetary policy. We have not “shot ourselves in the foot” and we have implemented reasonable policies to offset external shocks. The federal government budget deficit has generally returned towards zero following depression periods. Automatic stabilizers and congressional action have addressed recessionary periods with enough stimulus to stop economic decline and restart recovery.

More importantly, the structure of the US economy has changed. The share of high fixed cost manufacturing has declined as “services” has increased as a share of the total economy. The share of international trade (imports and exports) less directly connected to the domestic economy alone, has increased. The power of labor (unionized or not) has fallen, allowing firms to reduce hours and real wages during a downturn. In most recent times, firms better recognize the cost of attracting and developing highly skilled labor in a complex production world, so they retain key staff even during downturns. Vertical integration has been reduced, allowing firms to respond to minor demand changes more effectively. Based upon the quality revolution, major firms have reset their capacity utilization targets to 80% rather than 95%, providing firms with greater flexibility in managing variable demand and not reaching the point where internal costs increase and the need to increase prices occurs.

Financial leverage has also decreased. US firms have access to deep bond markets so are they able to incur only necessary levels of indebtedness.

Even with a much greater level of imported goods, retailers hold lower levels of inventory, allowing them to not overreact to changes in demand. Firms have more effective supply chain management processes.

The unemployment rate also shows this structural change. When it was pushed below 5% in the 1960’s, inflation increased and was not permanently checked for 20 years. By 2000 the economy was able to expand and keep unemployment below 5% for extended periods of time without triggering “cost-push” inflation. Unemployment still increases during an economic downturn, but low unemployment does not seem to trigger a recession.

From the 1950’s through the 1980’s inflation tended to increase as the economy overheated before a reduction in credit availability would slow the overall economy. Aside from the Covid pandemic shortages, we no longer see major inflation increases.

Impact

The business cycle caused firms to underinvest because the best available forecast was always that the boom period would be interrupted in 1-5 years. Sales, margins and profits could not be assumed to increase forever.

The business cycle caused firms to follow a stop-start pattern for capital investment projects, process improvement, research & development, new product introduction, new markets, new channels and mergers & acquisitions. Seeing a downturn, firms would cancel existing initiatives, even at a significant cost, in order to conserve cash and signal to stakeholders that management was actively managing the business. Projects would slowly resume after it was clear that the business cycle recovery was under way 2 years later.

For individuals, the “last hired, first fired” cycle applied. Firms froze open position hiring. They released interns and summer workers. They prohibited overtime. They cancel contracts with temporary labor firms. Less experienced workers and minority groups suffered. Labor intensive industries, especially construction, were hard hit. Smaller firms closed. The hiring cycle would resume 2 years later.

Historically, stock market values also followed the pattern of the business cycle closely. Stock market declines were seen as an “early warning” indicator by forecasters. Since stock market values are theoretically determined by a risk-adjusted discount rate, the reduction of business cycle variability allows investors to use a lower interest/discount rate and value future earnings at a higher net present value.

Summary

The business cycle appears to be gone. The modern economy does not have the same high fixed costs it once had. Firms are able to increase their sales, profits and capacities in tandem without greatly overshooting the mark. Our national institutions help to keep growth at a sustainable level. Workers, firms, investors and society all benefit from this great advance, even if it is not publicly celebrated.

What’s the Root Cause of Our Problems?: Human Nature

We have lost control of our political system and confidence in our institutions. I offer some root cause reasons for this situation in a series of posts. Second post in the series.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/647303/confidence-institutions-mostly-flat-police.aspx

Non-stop Growth of Economic Prosperity

Real, inflation adjusted, gross domestic product (GDP) is up 4 and 1/2 times since WWII when the American economy was the savior of Western Civilization and about to invest in the recovery of Europe and Japan. In this long-term perspective, growth is very constant. Critics can point to the capture of a greater share by the wealthy. Optimists can point to the radical improvement in quality not captured by GDP, increased consumer choices available and a larger share of retirees in the population.

Economic Satisfaction Stagnates

Consumer confidence rises with the economy and declines with recessions and polarized politics, but it has no upward trend to match real incomes!

Unlimited Wants, Limited Satisfactions

Economists assume that people have unlimited wants. Most research and common-sense experience show that this is true.

http://www2.harpercollege.edu/mhealy/eco211/lectures/microch1-17.htm

Post-war economists have persistently claimed that Americans “now” have everything they need materially to be happy, but they have been persistently wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Affluent_Society

Other research shows that beyond a certain level of income, more money doesn’t make people happier.

https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/does-more-money-correlate-greater-happiness-Penn-Princeton-research

Real people, at all levels of income, report that they would be happy, satisfied and secure if they only earned 50% more.

Behavioral Economists Say That Human Nature is at Fault

Our happiness often is based on our perceptions of comparative social and economic status. There is always someone with more.

https://www.neuroscienceof.com/human-nature-blog/social-comparison-social-media-status-wealth-happiness-psychology

We focus on our most recent experience rather than seeing the big picture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recency_bias

Once we have an idea in mind, we tend to consume information that confirms the idea and avoid or deny challenges. Positive, constructive people will be optimists. Others will be pessimists and follow the bad news media.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

When we do try to rationally assess our current situation, we compare it with something obvious. It’s usually something prominent, recent, large, and shiny. We compare today with our best ever experience or situation. We reset our expectations to compare with something prominent in our experience. We don’t plot graphs of our real annual earnings, wealth and leisure. Our expectations are anchored in our best experiences. Current expectations tend to move back to a neutral evaluation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring_effect

Summary

Humans want more. We are rarely satisfied. That means we are easily distracted in the modern world by marketers, influencers, journalists, bloggers and politicians. Human nature has not changed. Our true economic condition has improved with little impact. Our access to information, education, knowledge and wisdom has increased with minor impact. The ability of communicators to influence our perceptions of the world has greatly increased and we have generally not improved our defenses. “We have much, much work to do today” – Mr. Thoburn Dunlap, 1970, Fairport Harbor, Ohio high school teacher.

P.S. Focus on how the media works.

P.S.S. Positive view of economic and social progress.

The Janesville Plan: Economic Opportunity for All

https://www.amazon.com/Janesville-American-Story-Amy-Goldstein/dp/1501102265

This 2017 bestseller was applauded by the WSJ, The Economist, Harvard sociologist Robert Putnam, JD Vance (as a complement to Hillbilly Elegy) and Barrack Obama. It tells the story of Janesville, Wisconsin as a General Motors assembly plant with 3,000 workers was permanently closed in the turmoil of the Great Recession. It focuses on the impact on real people and the community’s response. The author concludes that neither the liberal response of job training nor the conservative response of economic redevelopment incentives was adequate to meet the community’s needs. What could work?

The Core Issue

The US economic and legal system protects the property rights of investors, corporations, and banks. It doesn’t protect or promote the property rights of the other actors in society quite so well: workers, suppliers, local governments, charities, retirees, and children. It is the fundamental discrepancy between different groups that is highlighted in this book, catalyzing the last 15 year’s populist reaction against our system, and begging for a practical solution.

The Core Challenge

Financial interests are flexible. They can be bought, sold and mortgaged. They are geographically mobile. Money and financial instruments are fungible. They can be exchanged with zero to small loss of value.

Other interests are much less flexible and mobile. Labor assets are tied to an individual. Individual labor assets may be tied to a specific situation OR broadly applicable. Real property is tied to a local and regional location. Local governments and charities are tied to a geography. Families are emotionally tied to a location.

The historical political conflict was between the wealthy and the non-wealthy. Landed aristocracy and peasants. Capitalists and workers.

Wealth still matters. The advantages of financial wealth have multiplied in the modern world. Financial rates of return are higher. International opportunities exist. Financial markets are effective and efficient. Risk can be managed through portfolios and derivatives. The shear amount of wealth, and wealth per person, is large enough to be scientifically managed. Generational wealth is preserved. Wealthy interests have effectively “captured” the political system to ensure they are not over-taxed or over-regulated. Network effects from neighborhoods and elite colleges accumulate. The network effects from large metropolitan areas accumulate.

As the advantages of financial wealth have compounded in our society, the distribution of income and wealth has become more and more unequal. For the good of our whole society, it’s time to take some steps to “level the playing field”. This is not strictly about protecting the poor or “fairly” taxing the rich. It is about providing “roughly” equal protection to the various property interests in our society.

The Pinches

In a meritocratic, capitalist society, there will be an unequal distribution of income and wealth. It is difficult to find an obvious “rule of thumb” to limit this dispersion. The higher income and wealth individuals are sure that they have “earned” their returns. Many libertarians and conservatives believe that the “job creators” and “value creators” in society are under rewarded, even before progressive taxation claims a greater share. Most working, middle and professional class earners are sure that they are underpaid compared to their value-added and that the tax system is designed to benefit “others”. Many vote for the conservative political party because they accept this as unavoidable, see disincentives and unintended consequences from attempts to change this, or aspire to become one of the winners. Economists and psychologists report that individuals are much more motivated by economic losses, taxes, risks or takeaways than gains. Hence, any kind of straightforward income or wealth redistribution system is difficult to achieve or maintain. The incentives to pull towards one end or the other are very strong. The philosopher John Rawls’ argument that everyone can, should, will agree to a set of reasonable policies pointing towards limiting income and wealth inequality has been applauded by the left, criticized by the right and ignored by most everyone. We need to find a different framework aside from the “tug of war”.

A dynamic capitalist economic system will include Schumpeterian “creative destruction”. There is enough new wealth to be made and captured that competitors will disrupt and compete with existing leaders in all markets. Firms will grow and die. New firms will be founded. Some will succeed. The real and financial capital within some firms at some times will be destroyed. For some firms this will be part of the portfolio of growing, stable and dying components. For some firms, this will be death. Capitalists will focus on the core goals of value creation, value capture and value preservation. They will do whatever is required to meet these goals. As Milton Friedman argued, at the extreme times they will not look out for the interests of other stakeholders. In good times, perhaps, a little. Based on social pressures, in good times, perhaps, a little. We need to clearly separate “what is” from “what should be”.

Financial investors do not have geographical responsibilities. They have financial responsibilities to owners and lenders. They have secondary interests in maintaining positive relations with suppliers, customers, key employees, key executives and regulators. Large organizations will close low performing assets as required, be they small stores or 3,000 employee factories. New and existing businesses locate plants, offices and distribution centers based on expected costs and benefits, risks and rewards. They are also guided by the convenience and views of their senior executives who generally prefer to live in cosmopolitan surroundings. Firms will decentralize and decentralize to meet various needs. For most firms, local economic incentives are a very minor factor.

Employees, suppliers, governments and charities are fundamentally local. They live real lives with a small number of interactions. They stay in place and appreciate the familiarity of their home, church, school and community. They might move when they finish college or before they have children in school or to meet an extreme need. The move from the east coast to the Midwest to the west took centuries. The move from the farms to the cities has continued for more than a century. The consolidation of the population into less than 100 metro areas has accelerated in the last 75 years. The move from the Midwest, northeast and Middle-Atlantic states to the sunbelt has continued for 75 years. Individuals move based on circumstances and incentives. A fair society provides support for individuals who do not wish to move because economic situations have changed.

The Solution: Protected Assets for All

Individuals who honestly review the growth of incomes, wealth and standards of living in the US for the last 75 years must celebrate the amazing 6-fold increase in real per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Labor productivity and overall productivity have improved similarly. Median incomes rose with GDP and productivity until 1975, stalled for 25 years and have since slowly resumed their climb. Quality of life, including health, economic choices, economic security, leisure, safety, product quality, entertainment, and product choices has continued to improve, even when income growth lagged behind output growth. The US economic system produces great wealth and benefits. There is an inherent tendency for the owners of financial wealth to capture an increasing share. We need to find a balanced solution, not undermine the economic system through misguided taxation or regulation.

Health Assets

The US is an outlier in the developed world in not managing health care as a public good. Liberals see health care as a human right. A majority of Americans disagree. We will not soon adopt “socialized health care”. We can work together to adopt policies that reduce the total cost of health care, and which prevent health care costs from bankrupting our fellow citizens.

  1. Provide catastrophic health care coverage for all, covering single event expenses exceeding $25,000.
  2. Provide payroll contribution funded ($200,000 max) annual income catastrophic family medical insurance (>$100,000/year) to all citizens. (alternative to $25K government provided fund)
  3. Invest in nominal co-pay front-line mental health screening, intervention, listening, training, group sessions and counseling services for less critical conditions. 
  4. Allow any group of 10 states to create a “medicare for all” health care program as a substitute for the Affordable Care Act.
  5. Allow any group of 10 states to create a private insurance-based (qualify in 2 states, qualifies for all states to ensure competition) health care program as a substitute for the Affordable Care Act.
  6. Pay-off all student loan debt for professional degree medical professionals serving 5 years in non-metropolitan county or metropolitan county with less than 300,000 population.
  7. Require states to provide tuition free medical care and residency spots for one doctor per 10,000 citizens each year.
  8. Reduce medical school preparation requirement to 3 years.
  9. Offer reciprocal medical licensing arrangements with 30 leading countries and expedited review and specific qualifications training and experience requirement defined for all others within 90 days of application.

Family Assets

  1. Provide an annual $10,000 childcare funding source for up to 4 children aged 0-6.
  2. Provide home childcare volunteer refundable tax credit up to $100 per week.
  3. Offer a supplemental 5% Earned Income Tax Credit for two-income families with combined family income below $60,000, phased out to zero at $90,000.
  4. Exclude the first $100K of owned homestead property from taxation and prohibit property taxes on first $250,000 for those aged 70 or above.

Community Assets

We live in a society that prefers to support communities locally and not rely upon government support. We can fine-tune our laws to encourage local support.

  1. Provide a $15/hour volunteer hour tax credit for up to 200 hours annually, including service with religious organizations.
  2. Remove the limits on charitable donation tax deductions for gifts made to public charities and local governments (not private foundations).
  3. Allow large employers to setup new employees with default 1% contribution to local United Way/Community Chest umbrella funding services.
  4. Determine paternity for all births, set and enforce child support agreements, provide basic level support from the state as required.
  5. Subsidize high-speed internet for rural counties.
  6. Offer 10 year T-bill interest rate financing for qualified “low cost” retailers to build stores more than 15 miles away from any existing qualified store.
  7. Levy a $500 per employee annual “closing costs” fee on large employers (250+) for a maximum 20 years to fund local redevelopment programs starting with $5,000 per discontinued employee.
  8. Levy a 0.5% of annual rentals fee on landlords to fund local redevelopment of abandoned properties and areas.
  9. Limit state and local economic development incentives to no more than $10 million per project or location.
  10. Offer a 50% federal tax credit for first $10,000 of cross-state moving expenses.
  11. Offer workers up to $5,000 for relocation or temporary housing as an alternative to up to 2 years of unemployment benefits. (alternative to tax credit for moving expenses)
  12. Restrict issuance of new building permits in counties that do not have one-third of affordable housing permits proposed for units below the existing median unit property value.
  13. Greatly expand availability of 1-2 year National Service programs for young adults and senior citizens.
  14. Invest in prison to work transition programs.
  15. Increase the minimum foundation endowment spending from 5% to 6% to provide more current social benefits and limit the accumulation of assets by universities and other not for profits with $100 million plus of invested assets. Provide an option to pay a 0.5% of assets annual fee to keep 5% or a 1% fee to only spend 4%.

Financial Assets

In our modern world we have to ensure that all individuals are financially prepared for 30 years of retirement. Early and constant savings. Wise investments. Good advisors. For everyone.

  1. Provide a 50% federal 401(k) match on the first $5,000 of savings. Offer a federally backed guaranteed return fund for 401(k) accounts with an after-inflation return of 3%.
  2. Make social security employee tax payments optional after age 62.
  3. Remove social security payment offsets from earned income after age 65.
  4. Auction to private firms the right to offer standard 401(k) financial advisory services for 0.5% of asset value with 100% federal match below $50,000 and 50% federal match below $100,000.
  5. Create voluntary 5% of income home down payment savings program that accumulates to $50,000 after 10 years of full-time employment contributions.

Financial Security

Lifetime employment is gone. Fixed benefits pensions are gone. We live 20 years longer. We need a more robust unemployment insurance system. Individuals may secure a position that pays 25% – 33% – 50% more than their “second best” alternatives. When individuals lose their jobs, we need to buffer their losses and nudge them towards their “next best” options in a timely manner.

  1. Reform unemployment insurance to provide 75% of historical income for 6 months and 50% of income for 12 months. Limit coverage to $60,000 of base income.
  2. Provide a 50% “bridging subsidy” for individuals whose income has dropped by more than 25% for up to 3 years. This would handle the effects of international trade and firm bankruptcies.
  3. Overhaul the “welfare system” to combine various programs into a single program combining a universal basic income (UBI) and the earned income tax credit (EITC).
  4. Create a self-funded unemployment lump-sum payment system based on prior 5 years earnings. 4 months award available after 10 years. 6 months after 15 years. 8 months after 20 years. (Alternative to higher benefits and bridging option)
  5. Maintain a present value of future social security benefits asset balance for each participant. After age 35, allow once per decade 10-year term loan at 10-year T-bill plus 2% for up to 20% of balance, maximum of $50,000 loan balance. Repayment through social security system earnings.
  6. Set a $15/hour adult minimum wage, indexed to 70% of the median income.

Consumer Assets

In the modern world, consumers face sophisticated marketers and professional services firms. They can benefit from centralized support.

  1. Set all import tariffs at zero percent, eliminating the effective tax on purchases.
  2. Eliminate all specific import tariffs but levy a 3% tariff on all goods to “protect” domestic producers and help fund government programs. (alternative to 0%)
  3. Set maximum prices per service and per hour for home and auto repair firms.
  4. States contract for metro and area multiple listing services and limit total real estate commissions to 4% of transaction value.
  5. Require financial advisors to meet the fiduciary standard of professional care, putting the client’s interests first.
  6. Certify public advisors to provide general advice on consumer economics, budgeting, banking, investing, real estate, insurance and health insurance for $100/hour to citizens, with a $50/hour, 8-hour maximum annual refundable tax credit.
  7. Staff state professional licensing boards with a minority of regulated active professionals. Reduce licensing requirements to meet public safety standards.
  8. Set a national cap on individual and class-action lawsuits at $2 million per person, adjusted for inflation.
  9. Auction regional licenses for private firms or states to offer low annual milage limit used car leases to low to medium credit score individuals using federal funding for the inventory.

Education/Human Capital Assets

It looks like our economic system is going to require one-thirds college educated and two-thirds less than college degreed adults. Economically and socially, we need to support all individuals to serve in their roles and for all of us to support the various roles. Think “essential workers” during the pandemic.

  1. Offer $10,000 for 2 years for high school graduates for their education and training, including “career and technical” training.
  2. Create German-style public-private partnerships for broad range of vocational training opportunities.
  3. Offer career and technical training grants for up to 2 years equal to state subsidy of college education.
  4. Provide alternate sets of courses and experience to meet minimum requirements for standard level high school diploma, rather than requiring gateway courses like Algebra II.
  5. Offer an all-industries state administered “career skills” certification program that can be earned in 3 years of employment and classes, including some classes for academic credit in high school.
  6. Require governments and large employers to justify any strict “BA needed” job requirements versus “education and experience” options.
  7. Tax university tuition income above $15,000 at 25% rate to fund public colleges.
  8. Expand veterans hiring preferences to state and local governments, government suppliers and large employers.
  9. Increase the minimum foundation endowment spending from 5% to 6% to provide more current social benefits and limit the accumulation of assets by universities and other not for profits with $100 million plus of invested assets. Provide an option to pay a 0.5% of assets annual fee to keep 5% or a 1% fee to only spend 4%.

Government Services Assets

The corporate world reduces costs and improves valued results by 1-2% year after year after year. We need to set the same expectations for local, state and federal governments.

  1. Sunset laws requiring reapproval of substantive changes after the first 10 years.
  2. Bipartisan staff recommended simplification and clean-up laws, one functional area per year, package approval, no amendments.
  3. Independent staff recommendation of lowest 10% benefit/cost ratios for regulations by agency every 10 years, package approval, no amendments.
  4. Implement balanced budget across the business cycle law that considers unemployment rate and debt to GDP levels.
  5. Require offsetting spending cuts or funding sources for new spending programs.
  6. Require federal programs to have a minimum 20-year payback from investments.
  7. Migrate to minimum 80% federal funding of all federal programs assigned to states.
  8. Outsource the USPS by region, maintaining 3 day per week delivery minimums.

Tax Fairness

  1. Set a separate 10% income tax rate on hourly earned overtime income, excluding it from regular “adjusted gross income”.
  2. Limit corporate type taxation to 10% for revenues below $1 million and 20% for revenues below $5 million.
  3. Limit combined state and local sales taxes to 5% of purchase values.
  4. Revise the “independent contractors” social security law to require the 12.4% self-employed contribution to be identified and deposited for all income.
  5. Eliminate the “carried interest” loophole benefit for investors.
  6. Limit the reduction of “capital gains” taxes versus labor income to a maximum of 20%. Increase the minimum period for long-term capital gains to 3 years. Provide a 50% of annual inflation above 4% credit in the detailed calculation.
  7. Require income earners to pay social security taxes on $1 million annually.
  8. Eliminate the mortgage interest deduction on second homes.
  9. Increase the IRS audit budget by 50%.
  10. Levy a 20% tax on inherited assets above $5 million, allowing a 10-year tax payment plan.

Funding Sources for “Everyone Has Assets”

  1. Levy an annual 0.25% of assets tax on banks and financial institutions.
  2. Levy a 0.25% financial transactions tax on stock and bond investors and traders.
  3. Set a 10% “luxury tax” on all transportation asset transactions worth $1 million or more.
  4. Set a 0.25% annual federal “luxury” real estate tax on all residences worth more than $2 million.
  5. Levy a 0.25% of deal value fee on all “mergers and acquisitions” transactions of $100 million or more.
  6. Levy a 0.25% excess profits tax on earnings above a 5% real, inflation adjusted return on assets (ROA) for firms with revenues of $100 million or more.
  7. Reduce the depletion allowance base on mineral assets by 10% of the acquisition cost.
  8. Starting with the 35% tax bracket ($462,501 married filing jointly), reduce allowable itemized tax deductions to 0 at $2 million of income.
  9. Add a 40% tax bracket at $2 million of income.
  10. Levy a 5% of excess price paid on personal vehicles sold for more than $50,000, boats for more than $100,000 and recreational vehicles for more than $100,000. (alternative to 10% above $1M)
  11. Add a 10% surcharge to property tax rates for residential properties larger than 5,000 square feet. (alternative to surtax above $2 million)

Setting Firm Limits on Taxes

I have separately proposed a set of constitutional amendments that limit taxation of the wealthy, allowing them to support steps like those above without fear of being fleeced.

Summary

Our society hasn’t found a clear organizing principle to guide it between the claims of the people and its leaders. We tend to lean towards the individual, liberty and freedom. This has led to a large number of modest initiatives. We have an opportunity to help our community embrace and support the political steps required to achieve our goals.

Dedications/Provocations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/amy-goldstein/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ryan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

Bernie Staller – National FFA leader (my supervisor from 2000-2004) Janesville leader.

https://www.agrimarketing.com/show_story.php?id=25007

https://www.nationalbeefwire.com/bernie-staller-tim-heiller-inducted-into-alpha-gamma-rho-s-hall-of-fame

https://wisconsinagconnection.com/news/staller-inducted-into-alpha-gamma-rho-hall-of-fame

https://www.agrimarketing.com/show_story.php?id=25005

https://www.newswise.com/articles/bernie-staller-to-retire-from-the-national-ffa-organization

The Painesville Plan (t) !!!

https://case.edu/ech/articles/d/diamond-shamrock-corp

https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0504696

On a personal note, I grew up in Fairport Harbor, Ohio, a small village of 3-4,000 people. The Diamond Alkali chemical plant once employed 5,000 people. It shut down in 1976. My dad was a pipefitter and union leader. My uncle Joe was also an employee and a union and political leader. The negative community impact was very large. The negative impacts described by Amy Goldstein in Janesville were exactly the same in Painesville 40 years earlier.

The US Economy is Already Great: No Tariffs Required

https://www.wkar.org/arts-culture/2014-05-12/oh-say-can-you-see-we-stand-on-guard-for-thee-exploring-a-hypothetical-us-canada-merger

The president-elect’s tariff threats are rejected by all professional economists and almost all business leaders. They are mistakenly intended to provide international relations negotiating leverage, force firms to build US factories, and increase domestic manufacturing employment employment. They are based upon the misguided belief that the US economy is broken. It is ironic that Democrats and liberal have trumpet the amazing condition of the US economy.

2 Million Obsolete Jobs Eliminated

45 Million Highly Skilled Jobs Added

13 Million Health Care Jobs Added

Labor Productivity More than Doubled

Real GDP Up 7X, As Manufacturing Share Cut in Half

Manufacturing Output Up by One-Third in Last Decade

US Still Produces 10 Million Vehicles Per Year

25 Million Jobs Added Since Great Recession

1 Million Available Manufacturing Jobs

US Economy Creates 2 Million Net New Jobs Year after Year

New Business Creation At 25 Year High

Biden versus Trump Economies

The US economy continues its evolution from agriculture to manufacturing to services to information. President Trump was responsible for the US economy from February, 2017 through January, 2020. President Biden assumed responsibility in February, 2020. In order to compare the two presidents, let’s look at Trump for the 3 years of sustained growth deep in the business cycle before the pandemic. For Biden, let’s look at a comparable 3-year period from June 2021 through June 2024, after the post-Covid rebound. Trump benefitted from an 8-year long business cycle expansion. Biden had to deal with a once in a century pandemic driven economic depression.

Inflation: Advantage Trump

The independent Federal Reserve Board responded to the pandemic by greatly increasing the money supply to ensure that profitable, well-run financial institutions would be able to survive the temporary disruptions in the real economy. The Fed increased the money supply by 4-5 times its prior level to ensure the economy did not collapse! The extra money supply had to end up somewhere. It drove up consumer prices and increased asset values in the stock market and for home prices.

Inflation grew by 2% per year with Trump. It grew by 5% per year, on average, with Biden. Overall prices are 9% higher with Biden. Trump’s economic policies extended the Obama recovery for 3 years without triggering an increase in inflation, despite a low unemployment labor market.

The largest cause of higher than usual inflation in Biden’s term was the 20% spike in US and global demand for durable goods. Factories shut down during the pandemic. Demand rebounded within 6 months as consumers chose to spend money on goods rather than in-person services. Consumer demand at the end of the Biden period is 50% higher than at the start of Trump’s term in office.

Corporations were able to capture and maintain a 50% profit increases due to market disruptions of the pandemic. Experts mostly reject Biden’s claims that corporate profits were the main driver of inflation, but they clearly aggravated the impact of the supply chain disruptions.

Obama was able to reduce federal budget deficits by two-thirds by the end of his presidency. Deficits doubled on Trump’s watch before the pandemic arrived. Biden cut deficits from their record highs during the pandemic, but they have been 50% higher than the pre-pandemic Trump era. Most economists consider the budget deficits to be the main cause of the continued higher than typical rates of inflation, accounting for 3%, 2% and 1% extra inflation in the 3-year Biden time we’re considering.

High profile gas prices remined flat during Trump’s period. Global supply and demand caused prices to increase from $2.50 per gallon to $3.50/gallon where they have remained for the last 3 years.

Trump enjoyed historically low 4% mortgage interest rates, a thin 2% above the inflation rate. The expansion of the money supply drive rates down to 3% during 2020 and 2021. They rose to 7% as inflation rose sharply and has stayed there. Inflation has fallen but markets typically require years of data to reset expectations of long-term inflation which drive mortgage rates. The Federal Reserve Bank has hesitated to cut its benchmark interest rates until inflation is clearly approaching its 2% target.

Labor Market: Advantage Biden

Trump reduced unemployment by 1%. Biden reduced it by 2%. Both presided over best in 50 years overall labor markets.

Layoffs have remained at historic lows, with Biden enjoying slightly lower rates.

Job openings in the Biden market have been 50% higher than the Trump market, reflecting a strong economy with growing labor demand, despite the impact of the pandemic.

The Biden economy recovered all 20 million jobs lost in the pandemic within 2 years, much faster than expected. Total employment has continued to grow at the trend rate to a record 159 million.

Core labor force participation is 1% higher with Biden than Trump. The current participation rate was last achieved in 2001.

Median real wages have been slightly higher during Biden’s tenure.

Asset Values: Advantage Biden

Despite the pandemic disruptions and losses, US firms are worth 70% more today than before the pandemic. This reflects the 50% profits increase and continued positive future prospects.

Home prices have nearly doubled since before the pandemic, reflecting the post Great Recession decline in home building, construction issues during the pandemic and general asset inflation caused by the rapid expansion of the money supply.

The US enjoyed a solid 7% savings rate before the pandemic, an extraordinary high 10% after the pandemic, falling to just 4% for the last 3 years.

https://educationdata.org/number-of-college-graduates

Human assets increased during Trump’s presidency and resumed growth after the pandemic. As college graduation rates have increased throughout the post WWII years, the cumulative number of college educated individuals continues to rise each year. The growth in masters and professional degrees is noteworthy.

The Economy – Advantage Biden

Population growth has resumed after the pandemic.

The healthy US economy is able to support 3 million more retirees after the pandemic.

Real dollar GDP is 2 trillion dollars larger than before the pandemic disruption. That increase is the same size as the total GDP of Russia, Canada or Mexico. We added the Canada economy during Trump’s time and the Mexican economy during Biden’s time.

Real personal income grew a little bit faster during Trump’s time and more smoothly. Personal incomes jumped up during the pandemic but have been flat since that time with corporations capturing a greater share of the economy’s returns.

Workers have been 8-10% more productive in the Biden economy.

Farm income has doubled in the Biden economy.

Manufacturing employment grew by a surprising 3% in Trump’s term. It is slightly higher in the Biden era.

Real dollar exports increased during the Trump presidency and then again during Biden’s time despite a greatly stronger US dollar which hampers exports.

The world is willing to pay 10% more to hold US dollars in the Biden period, reflecting strong economic realities and prospects despite the risks of higher US inflation and budget deficits.

Summary

The US economy is very strong. Trump was able to extend the Obama recovery for longer than most expected, keeping inflation, interest rates and unemployment at low levels. Biden managed the recovery from the pandemic induced recession better than expected. The economy, asset prices and labor market have recovered very nicely. Inflation has remained the weak part of the Biden economy. It is lower than in comparable global economies and trending towards the 2% target in 2025. Critics point to excess government spending as an avoidable source of high inflation.

The Trump economy built upon the success of his predecessor. The Biden economy overcame the disruption of the pandemic to produce equal or greater results. Both presidents delivered solid results.

Index of Recent Inflation and General Economy Articles

Inflation is dropping nicely but won’t reach 2% this year. Technical issues in calculation of housing costs which drives inflation a year later than reality. Government spending / budget deficit in a full-employment economy pushes inflation. Physical goods prices are declining. Services prices are stickier, with a smaller wage-price spiral effect. Global economy is weaker than the US, which is helping. Independent Federal Reserve is holding interest rates high longer than required, making up for its prior slow increase in interest rates.

Fiscal and monetary policy matter. Other industry level policies can greatly reduce inflation. The president and congress have not responded to my early 2022 advice!

Goods prices are well controlled. Services prices, especially education and health care, have increased faster.

February, 2022. Loose fiscal and monetary policies. Supply chain disruption due to the pandemic.

July, 2023. 2% is possible in 2024. I was overly optimistic.

January, 2023. Chicken little, the sky is falling. No, inflation has already peaked.

November, 2022. Inflation fears are high. The data is positive, but mixed and not enduring enough to be confident that inflation is falling, not accelerating.

Corporations took advantage of supply chain disruptions and shortages to increase prices quite dramatically. Prices had been smooth for a decade. Firms increased them quickly. Prices have NOT continued to increase. They have dropped a bit, especially for goods.

Political parties “frame” the most important issues to provide political advantages. Inflation had not been “highly important” for 40 years.

November, 2022. Measures of economic recovery are clear.

October, 2022. A soft landing was not expected. It has occurred.

December, 2023. US is bouncing back faster than other countries.

Longer term view. A decade long recovery. Covid. Recovery continues.

November, 2022. The critics were looking for economic disaster. It was not coming.
May, 2024. The US exceeds expectations again.

January, 2023. Recovery is uncertain. The data is positive.